Liberal Forum

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 5:05 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 5:05 am

All I ask is that when you make a claim,  if you are NOT clueless, you'll be happy to substantiate that claim. 

The claim you made was that I'm clueless. 

Evidence, please.  

No problem. Here ya go.

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 5:05 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 5:05 am

Ah hah!  You don't have it.  

"he who slings mud loses ground" ---some ancient asian dude,  didn't you get the memo?

Nuff?

 

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 6:22 am

  I will concede to more compelling arguments than my own, that is all that matters

Oh, goody. 

If all that matters is the argument, argue about something worth arguing about. 

Another cheap-**** "we got him this time" in a seven year hysterical screech ain't it, bub. Nobody **** cares.
 
 

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 6:28 am

Part 2, continued: 

But I didn't ask anyone on this forum if they 'cared'. I'm not that much interested in sentiment but of course it's okay to slip them in here and there.  I'm glad you and I agree on that sentiment that you approve of Trump going to jail, however.  I don't think it would be a low, I think it would be America coming to her senses and doing the right thing and having the courage to do it. 

LMAO. We have a pResident in office who "won" under the dirtiest ever election conditions, who is ON TAPE admitting to bribing foreign official and interfering in their internal issues against longstanding law.

He is the creepiest freak we've ever had in orifice. His own daughter's diary speaks of molestation. His drug addict son calls him pedo in the laptop he lost track of due to a drug-addled brain.

And you want to argue about minutia regarding whether you've got him this time. You're a fruitcake and other ad homs, turdling.

As to why I contributed in the first place, it was to bump a new turd's thread. As to why I continue, I am responding to your swill.

Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm

LMAO. We have a pResident in office who "won" under the dirtiest ever election conditions, who is ON TAPE admitting to bribing foreign official and interfering in their internal issues against longstanding law.

He is the creepiest freak we've ever had in orifice. His own daughter's diary speaks of molestation. His drug addict son calls him pedo in the laptop he lost track of due to a drug-addled brain.

And you want to argue about minutia regarding whether you've got him this time. You're a fruitcake and other ad homs, turdling.

As to why I contributed in the first place, it was to bump a new turd's thread. As to why I continue, I am responding to your swill.

I think you've been chatGPT'd 

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 03 Jun 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:25 pm

I think you've been chatGPT'd 

Inorite?

N I'm posta handle it without ad homs.

Well - according to THAT dick sucker.
 

Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:05 pm

All that you have said about tRump is fake news. You cannot prove a word of it.

"Fake News" = Thought-Terminating Cliché.  TTCs, via repetition, are  implanted in to the minds of the followers of a demagogue (such as Trump) in order to curb critical thinking and kill dissent. Demagogues do not like their members to think, let alone dissent, so, via repetition, they inculcate thought-terminating clichés into the minds of followers so that when they are challenged, they just dish them up in an effort to kill dissent.  This helps forward the demagogue's right wing agenda. Very typical of fascists and Fascists. Your example is a text book example.  

Take a xanax,

Your father, Luke.

Whatever
 
 

Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:06 pm

No problem. Here ya go.

Nuff?

Clearly, I can't take you seriously.  
Why?  All you have offered thus far, are....

1. tired tropes
2.  arguments riddled with weasel words.
3.  Failure to back up your claims. 

Etc.  Overall, you're a piss poor debater.  

It's quite possible you are stupid, but I won't go that far, yet.  

Now, of course, no doubt you'll call me the same or something similar, because you are predictable. 

Which, of course, is a cop out.  

You really do not want to debate me.  I know this when  debaters settle for snarky short quips.  I have a habit of causing people to actually think, and those that cannot, often just give up and descend into pettiness.  It happens a lot on forums such as this one. You are no exception. 

In fact, mediocrity has so overcome you, you cannot escape it, no matter how hard you try. 

But, I invite you to prove me wrong.  But, to do that, you'll have to put on your thinking cap and work a little harder.  

And try not to sling mud, it lessens you.  It makes me think you are stupid, and you aren't stupid, are you?   

Say it isn't so.   

Cheers,
Prospero. 

 
 

Yep... that's Marge.

 

FJB » 03 Jun 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 11:31 am

I DON'T GIVE A FLYING **** WHAT SOME LIBTARD ASSWIPE LIKE YOU THINKS OR SAYS

So, you are not here to debate, then, right? 

You are only interested in impressing your mentally incompetent friends, getting brownie points or whatever the **** they call them on this forum. 

Right?  

Clearly, I can't take you seriously.   

Cute, off to ignore land you go.  Now you can pester someone else.  

Cheers,

Prospero

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm

Clearly, I can't take you seriously.  
Why?  All you have offered thus far, are....

1. tired tropes
2.  arguments riddled with weasel words.
3.  Failure to back up your claims. 

Etc.  Overall, you're a piss poor debater.

Okay.

You're a *** dicker.

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm

It's quite possible you are stupid, but I won't go that far, yet.  

Now, of course, no doubt you'll call me the same or something similar, because you are predictable.

Spicey haired Norwegians eat falafel. Peanutbutter makes an excellent super conductor.

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm

Which, of course, is a cop out.  

You really do not want to debate me.

That's true - I use Gayaway Spray for a reason.

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm

I know this when  debaters settle for snarky short quips.  I have a habit of causing people to actually think, and those that cannot, often just give up and descend into pettiness.  It happens a lot on forums such as this one. You are no exception.

Happy to hear that - look forward to you causing me to think, you tedious ****-mouth.

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm

In fact, mediocrity has so overcome you, you cannot escape it, no matter how hard you try.

That is in fact my complaint, midwit.

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm

But, I invite you to prove me wrong.  But, to do that, you'll have to put on your thinking cap and work a little harder.

Thank you for the opportunity. The underlying premise that I give a **** what you think is off base, though.

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:40 pm

And try not to sling mud, it lessens you.  It makes me think you are stupid, and you aren't stupid, are you?   

Say it isn't so.   

Cheers,
Prospero.

I am all things to all men, prospero.

Cheer wine,

Your father, Luke.
 

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:47 pm

So, you are not here to debate, then, right? 

You are only interested in impressing your mentally incompetent friends, getting brownie points or whatever the **** they call them on this forum. 

Right?  

Clearly, I can't take you seriously.   

Cute, off to ignore land you go.  Now you can pester someone else.  

Cheers,

Prospero

I love beating down assholes like you

Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm

LMAO. We have a pResident in office who "won" under the dirtiest ever election conditions,

Every election has irregularities, and given the pandemic, it was to be expected. 

who is ON TAPE admitting to bribing foreign official and interfering in their internal issues against longstanding law.

Clear evidence you are clueless.  This is an old, tired, right wing trope that has been debunked so many times, up one side and down the other..  

He is the creepiest freak we've ever had in orifice. His own daughter's diary speaks of molestation.

We get it, you hate Joe Biden,  But what you are referring to is an entry in to her diary, which is a fleeting memory reference as a child, noting that there is no indication of trauma from her father in her diary, and we have many instances of her adoring her father.  Clearly, right wingers are jackals frothing at the mouth over an innocent example of a parent bathing a child, and a teenager's fleeting memory of it noted in a diary, noting there is no indication of trauma over the incident in the diary.  You people should be ashamed.  And it's rich, considering we have quotes by Trump stating that he'd date his daughter if she weren't his daughter, we have him on tape saying he likes to barge in on teens while they are dressing at his pageants, so why do you even care, when Trump, who is accused by 25 women of sex abuse, one rape, noting he was ruled as liable for sex abuse and must pay $5 million restitution, and thus he is clearly a pervert, so your fake outrage is noted.  

His drug addict son calls him pedo in the laptop he lost track of due to a drug-addled brain.

There is no credible evidence that Hunter Biden called his father Joe Biden a ‘pedophile’. The claim  originated on 4chan, an anonymous online forum known for spreading false information and conspiracy theories. The claim was then picked up by some conservative media outlets and social media users
PolitiFact | Fact-checking the pedophilia attacks against Joe Biden
In fact, Joe Biden has been the target of baseless accusations of pedophilia by Republicans for years. These accusations have been debunked by fact-checkers.

And you want to argue about minutia regarding whether you've got him this time. You're a fruitcake and other ad homs, turdling.

As to why I contributed in the first place, it was to bump a new turd's thread. As to why I continue, I am responding to your swill.

Clearly, you are stupid, and traffic in cheap innuendo floating around the right wing echo chambers.

Unfortunately  there is no cure.  You shall remain ignorant the rest of your life. 
 
 
 

If anybody's going to jail for espionage it's going to be Xiden. That cocksucker has been stealing classified documents out of the SCHIFF's since he was a low level senator.

He had top secret classified nuclear codes at his UPenn-CCP office down the street from the Chinese embassy and scattered all over the floor in his dirty garage.

What did the Xiden crime family receive in return for allowing the Chinese spy satellite to fly all over our nuclear ICBM military sites gathering Intel?


 

Warcok » 03 Jun 2023, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 4:06 pm

If anybody's going to jail for espionage it's going to be Xiden. That cocksucker has been stealing classified documents out of the SCHIFF's since he was a low level senator.

He had top secret classified nuclear codes at his UPenn-CCP office down the street from the Chinese embassy and scattered all over the floor in his dirty garage.

What did the Xiden crime family receive in return for allowing the Chinese spy satellite to fly all over our nuclear ICBM military sites gathering Intel?

Your passage has several logical fallacies, unsupported allegations, and inappropriate language. Here's a breakdown:
Ad Hominem Attacks: You resort to using derogatory language towards Biden, which is an example of an ad hominem attack. This personal attack doesn't contribute to the actual argument at hand, and instead stirs up an emotional response. It's not contributing anything meaningful to your argument.
Unsupported Claims: You are accusing Biden of serious crimes like espionage and stealing classified documents, but where's your evidence? These are weighty criminal accusations, and they need substantial proof, not just allegations.
Hasty Generalization: You make sweeping statements about supposed actions by Biden without providing specific examples or data to back them up. That's a hasty generalization, a type of logical fallacy where a rule is created based on insufficient evidence.
Straw Man Fallacy: You are suggesting that Biden allowed a Chinese spy satellite to fly over American nuclear military sites, thus implying his complicity in espionage. This is a straw man argument because you are misrepresenting his position to make it easier to attack. Without concrete evidence that Biden had any control over a foreign country's satellites, your argument is built on a false premise.
Red Herring Fallacy: Your linking of Biden's supposed actions with a "Biden crime family" is an attempt to distract from the original argument and doesn't actually contribute to your claim. That's a red herring fallacy, where irrelevant information is used to divert attention from the real topic.
Guilt by Association: You are saying that because Biden's office was near the Chinese embassy, he must have been involved in espionage. This is a guilt by association fallacy. The location of someone's office doesn't imply any wrongdoing unless you have more evidence to back up such a claim.
 In summary, your text is largely unsupported by facts and is reliant on derogatory language, unsubstantiated claims, and logical fallacies.

In other words, fail.  
 

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm

Every election has irregularities, and given the pandemic, it was to be expected. 

Clear evidence you are clueless.  This is an old, tired, right wing trope that has been debunked so many times, up one side and down the other..  

We get it, you hate Joe Biden,  But what you are referring to is an entry in to her diary, which is a fleeting memory reference as a child, noting that there is no indication of trauma from her father in her diary, and we have many instances of her adoring her father.  Clearly, right wingers are jackals frothing at the mouth over an innocent example of a parent bathing a child, and a teenager's fleeting memory of it noted in a diary, noting there is no indication of trauma over the incident in the diary.  You people should be ashamed.  And it's rich, considering we have quotes by Trump stating that he'd date his daughter if she weren't his daughter, we have him on tape saying he likes to barge in on teens while they are dressing at his pageants, so why do you even care, when Trump, who is accused by 25 women of sex abuse, one rape, noting he was ruled as liable for sex abuse and must pay $5 million restitution, and thus he is clearly a pervert, so your fake outrage is noted.  

There is no credible evidence that Hunter Biden called his father Joe Biden a ‘pedophile’. The claim  originated on 4chan, an anonymous online forum known for spreading false information and conspiracy theories. The claim was then picked up by some conservative media outlets and social media users
PolitiFact | Fact-checking the pedophilia attacks against Joe Biden
In fact, Joe Biden has been the target of baseless accusations of pedophilia by Republicans for years. These accusations have been debunked by fact-checkers.

Clearly, you are stupid, and traffic in cheap innuendo floating around the right wing echo chambers.

Unfortunately  there is no cure.  You shall remain ignorant the rest of your life.

Okay, fruitcake       
 

Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2023, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:55 pm

Okay.

You're a *** dicker.

Spicey haired Norwegians eat falafel. Peanutbutter makes an excellent super conductor.

That's true - I use Gayaway Spray for a reason.

Happy to hear that - look forward to you causing me to think, you tedious ****-mouth.

That is in fact my complaint, midwit.

Thank you for the opportunity. The underlying premise that I give a **** what you think is off base, though.

I am all things to all men, prospero.

Cheer wine,

Your father, Luke.

That's odd, all I see is mediocrity. 
 

Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 4:16 pm

Okay, fruitcake     

They say ignorance is bliss, and you are one happy fella. 

 

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 4:18 pm

That's odd, all I see is mediocrity.

All I see is a lightweight on my nutsack. 

Your **** was answered by my first post - which was the second post of the thread. You choked on it, ignoring it while addressing several subsequent posts. Then you PRETENDED to address it, with a great deal of flatulence. The rest has been you chasing me around for another crotch grope. 

I see a partisan pest and a pseudo-intellectual asswipe.
 

Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2023, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 4:21 pm

All I see is a lightweight on my nutsack. 

Your **** was answered by my first post - which was the second post of the thread. You choked on it, ignoring it while addressing several subsequent posts. Then you PRETENDED to address it, with a great deal of flatulence. The rest has been you chasing me around for another crotch grope. 

I see a partisan pest and a pseudo-intellectual asswipe.

She makes some mean biochar though.

Best I've ever seen.

   
 

Prospero » 03 Jun 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2023, 3:31 pm

"Fake News" = Thought-Terminating Cliché.  TTCs, via repetition, are  implanted in to the minds of the followers of a demagogue (such as Trump) in order to curb critical thinking and kill dissent. Demagogues do not like their members to think, let alone dissent, so, via repetition, they inculcate thought-terminating clichés into the minds of followers so that when they are challenged, they just dish them up in an effort to kill dissent.  This helps forward the demagogue's right wing agenda. Very typical of fascists and Fascists. Your example is a text book example.  

Whatever

No, Fake News is Fake News....
funny how your AI tried to conceptualize "Fake news " as a TTC tied to Demagoguery in relation to Trump while completely ignoring the use of "fake news" and TTC's used by The Democrat party over the last 6.5 years especially using the MSM as a tool of repetition for their "fake News"(TTC's.)
Your AI failed because it could not provide any examples of "Fake News" by Trump beyond trying to conceptualize what your own politically skewed bias asked it to conceptualize.

Now for some reality regarding "fake News" and repetition of "Fake News" on an unsuspecting populace.....
Hillary Clinton and her campaign came up with a plot to create a scandal that woukd tie Russia to Trump and claim Russian collusion ​​​​​based on a former leftist British intel agents report that her campaign paid for.
Most of the MSM for years propagated  this very real and contrived "Fake news" while also creating and propagating other "fake news" tied to the original lie.
Which lead to a certain portion of the population totally believing the lie (Fake News) even to this very day .
any questions regarding your abject stupidity regarding "Fake News" or how AI works??? because you don't have a clue.....