TRUTH in BLUE (Part B)B.See » 06 Jun 2023, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Well, last time I looked, Democrats HAVEN'TNOT "****" as you say. But documented HISTORICAL FACTS. And MAGAS saying otherwise, doesn't CHANGE THE FACTS.
- ENGAGED IN VOTER SUPPRESSION CONTRARY TO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE OF RELATIVELY LITTLE VOTER FRAUD
- TOLD A KNOWN TERRORIST GROUP TO "STAND BACK AND STAND BY" WITH REGARD TO POSSIBLY LOSING AN ELECTION
- CLAIMED THAT THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WAS "STOLEN" WHEN YOU FKNG KNEW (AND PRIVATELY ACKNOWLEDGED) YOU LOST
- HAD YOUR LIE BACKED BY A RIGHT WINGED PROPAGANDA NETWORK WHO ALSO KNOWINGLY LIED
- ENGAGED IN COLLUSION WITH DEEP STATE MAGAS AT VARIOUS STATE LEVELS TO GET THE VOTING RESULTS THROWN OUT OR OVERTURNED
- ASSEMBLED AND SENT A BATCH OF FAKE ELECTORS TO WASHINGTON WITH FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS CONTAINING FAKE RESULTS
- THREATENED A VICE PRESIDENT FOR NOT GOING ALONG WITH THE FKNG LIE
- INCITED AN ARMED MOB TO STORM THE CAPITOL LOOKING TO "HANG" THAT VICE PRESIDENT
- WHILE 147 MAGA LAWMAKERS CO-CONSPIRATORS VOTED AGAINST CERTIFYING THE ELECTION
- AFTER WHICH THE MAGA PARTY'S NATIONAL COMMITTEE CALLED THIS ATTEMPTED COUP AND OVERTHROW OF DEMOCRACY, "LEGITIMATE POLITICAL DISCOURSE"
- AND MAGA CONNECTED SO-CALLED "AUDITORS" IN AN ATTEMPT TO PROVE THEIR LIES, BREACHED VOTING MACHINES, REMOVED VOTER RECORDS TO UNKNOWN LOCATIONS, AND AFTER ALL THAT **** AND MORE,
- STILL CAME UP EMPTY HANDED.
(thanks Prospero for addressing the rest of it).
ConservativeWave » 06 Jun 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The FACTS in BLUE above... READ and WEEP (Part A)!
Prospero » 07 Jun 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Incompetent rebuttal, no substantiation offered.
I don't engage with lazy posters.
Now?
Prospero » 07 Jun 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ I like Snowden, but he's a fool. However, if I were president, I'd pardon him after he served a couple of years in jail.
I loved how he embarrassed Obama. So funny and gangster.Prospero » 07 Jun 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ I like Snowden, but he's a fool. However, if I were president, I'd pardon him after he served a couple of years in jail.

F- THE FBI. IT IS CORRUPT AND MUST BE DEFUNDED AND DISMANTLED.ConservativeWave » 03 Jun 2023, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ 80% of the FBI... and probably 80% of America in general... wants to have NOTHING to do with the CORRUPTION in today's FBI... and DO NOT support the Totalitarian Deep State elements within our Government... AND SO... We STILL have ENOUGH SUPPORT to take back the DEMOCRACY THAT IS OURS... from the CORRUPT TOTALITARIAN elements who would TAKE it from us !!
BECAUSE if we don't do it NOW... there WILL come a time when IT WILL BE TOO LATE !!
Below, was in interview with Maria Barataromo, and an EX FBI agent named Nichole Parker... this as part of the announcement that FBI Director Christopher Wray... faced with CONTEMPT of Congress threats, WILL deliver subpoenaed documents (relating to Joe Biden's CORRUPTION and acceptance of millions of dollars in bribes and kick-back)... to Congress. THIS interview, as well as the testimony of ALL the FBI whistleblowers.... IS BEEN EYE OPENING !!↓https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qM5mhG1IV1o&t=32s
YOU are FULL of **** !! The FACTS in BLUE.. above... (Part A):B.See » 03 Jun 2023, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ It's all just typical reich-winged Bizarro-world alternate reality anyway. Their modus operandi is to accuse democrats of what THEY in fact are.
The above has been the FAVORITE tactic of Democras for over 30 years... and YOU have the GALL to accuse Republicans of doing it? GIVE US EXAMPLES... like Democrats fighting against FISA warrants in the early 2000's... and then is was DEMOCRATS who FALSIFIED FISA warrants to spy on Donald Trump (PROVEN).. and GOD KNOWS how many timed they have done it before... OR like Democrats who accused TRUMP of trying to STEAL an election... when it was the Democrats, the FBI and the deep State who CREATED FAKE accusations against Trump, Investigated him for YEARS, and ultimately found NOTHING... and TRIEd and succeeded in INFLUENCING the 2020 election... The SHOE however might be on the OTHER foot today !
Y'know, like how the domestic terrorists Moms for 'Liberty' are really about their liberty to ban and white wash the history of Black people and other minorities from school books, the liberty to demonize gay people, and the liberty to offer up "alternative viewpoints" on the Holocaust, even.
NO ONE is trying to HIDE what happened to Blacks and gays in the past... TODAY, THEY are FREE to live their lives as they see fit... NO ONE is trying to CHANGE history from the Republican side. HOWEVER... DEMOCRATS... DO YOU KNOW that we fought a Civil war where OVER 600,000 white Americans died FIGHTING to FREE slaves? DEMOCRATS are trying to take down the statues of some of the SAME MEN who gave their LIVES in that fight !
These are the people who've tried to overthrow a democratically held presidential election, whose representatives (147 of them) refused to certify Biden's election, whose RNC declared the violent assault upon our nation's Capitol to be "legitimate political discourse."
A "democratically held presidential election"... DO you KNOW that investigating a sitting president when the KNEW he was innocent... and HIDING the Hunter Laptop story so that American could not HEAR how and why Joe Biden is and was a CORRUPT SOB... is a the VERY LEAST Election interference... and VERY PROBABLY Election FRAUD as well ? lets not even he into DEMOCRAT VOTE Harvesting, and STUFFING ballot boxes !!
The party that on a state level, has sought to take over election boards, ousting those not completely beholden to them, have passed numerous voter suppression laws, have empowered themselves to overturn voter outcomes they don't like
SOMEONE needs to TAKE BACK our elections... Under the Democrat Party and their voting liberalization... ILLEGALS CAN VOTE... VOTES can be harvested WEEKS after the elections are over,and BALLOTS can be STUFFED into ballot boxes, in the wee hours of the night... KNOWING there is NO WAY the ballots can EVER be verified... America NEEDS to FIX some of these INTENTIONAL Liberalization laws that have been passed by DEMOCRATS !!
have gerrymandered districts to give themselves more seats with fewer votes, are making it harder for states to be able to hold elections for voter initiatives
YOU HAVE to know that Democrats have been gerrymandering for 100 YEARS or MORE... it's only when Republicans started playing the same game tha Democras got TERRIFIED !
This is a **** story. When the dust settles, Republicans in the house are going to have egg on their facesSkans » 07 Jun 2023, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ F- THE FBI. IT IS CORRUPT AND MUST BE DEFUNDED AND DISMANTLED.
Prospero » 08 Jun 2023, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑ This is a **** story. When the dust settles, Republicans in the house are going to have egg on their faces
Wray invited anyone from congress to view the document in a controlled setting. The Congress has no right to any document that is part of an ongoing investigation, it's a separation of powers thing.
Not true. Congress has the right to investigate FBI corruption. We'll just have to let the Supreme Court decide this. FWIW, the House should simply refuse to pass any budget that has funding for the Department of Justice.Prospero » 08 Jun 2023, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑ This is a **** story. When the dust settles, Republicans in the house are going to have egg on their faces
Wray invited anyone from congress to view the document in a controlled setting. The Congress has no right to any document that is part of an ongoing investigation, it's a separation of powers thing.
The Congress has no right to any document that is part of an ongoing investigation, it's a separation of powers thing. Your contention, though true, does not refute this fact. Constitutionally minded Justices will no doubt agree on that point. Also note that the point is moot given that Dir Wray has invited any congressperson to view the document in question at the FBI headquarters in a secure setting. They don't need to possess the document, but they can view it, as the invitation was given by Wray. Also note that the Durham Report made no claim that the FBI was corrupt, nor did the IG Report by Horowitz. In point of fact, the Durham Report only mentioned the term 'corrupt' 6 or 7 times and in each instance, it was in reference to something other than the FBI. I know, I checked. So, your claim is without evidence.Skans » 08 Jun 2023, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ Not true. Congress has the right to investigate FBI corruption. We'll just have to let the Supreme Court decide this.
THere is no way in hell a budget that does not fund the FBI will ever be signed by the President.FWIW, the House should simply refuse to pass any budget that has funding for the Department of Justice.
Incompetent rebuttal, lacks substantiation on points in blue.ConservativeWave » 07 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU are FULL of **** !! The FACTS in BLUE.. above... (Part A):