oh Sheet. You must not have met FUIQUIT murdock.impartialobserver » 08 Jun 2023, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I have yet to encounter someone online or in real life who talks about sucking dick as much as CrimeaRiver or BuckNaked (King on .org). For being so staunchly hetero.. they talk about this stuff a lot.
DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2023, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑ Gee, do ya think it's because they consider it an insult?
Then that definition fits many others as well.impartialobserver » 09 Jun 2023, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ If they spoke about it intermittently then you have a point but when 75% or more of their posts are about it and they post dozens of times on a given day.. that tells me of obsession.
DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Then that definition fits many others as well.
Must be merely common cyberspace forum behavior then if it includes your ilk, right?
Impartial Observer is conservative on some issues and more liberal on others. He's probably more of a libertarian. You can't throw him in with the leftists on this forum, that would be a mistake.DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Then that definition fits many others as well.
Must be merely common cyberspace forum behavior then if it includes your ilk, right?
Being a contrarian seems to be his schtick.Skans » 09 Jun 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Impartial Observer is conservative on some issues and more liberal on others. He's probably more of a libertarian. You can't throw him in with the leftists on this forum, that would be a mistake.
Yup. You sure are.impartialobserver » 09 Jun 2023, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ just curious, who is my ilk?
they are free to talk about this as much as they want to.. and I am free to point out that they are seemingly obsessed with it.
Skans » 09 Jun 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Impartial Observer is conservative on some issues and more liberal on others. He's probably more of a libertarian. You can't throw him in with the leftists on this forum, that would be a mistake.
I've conversed with Impartial Observer over the years. Initially, I thought he was a leftist pretending to be some kind of middle of the road moderate. After I got to know him through his posts and writing, I came to realize that's not the case. He has an interesting background which shapes his believes that do not necessarily track one side or the other.DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Being a contrarian seems to be his schtick.
He laments others for being one-trick ponies.
I see him as that. Another one-trick pony.
I don't read all his ****, though... there's that too.
Who said anything about jailing dick suckers like yourself?Xavier_Onassis » 09 Jun 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ So you want to jail anyone that has ever sucked a dick while at the same time claiming that you live in a free country?
Nearly every hand you have even held or shaken has had a dick in it.
I fail to see why there is so much chatter about duck sucking here.
It's like you clowns are stuck in the seventh grade.
Pro sports can be a job creator. However, it depends on a lot of things. The City/County involvement. Strength of investors. Control and quality of development. Location. Many other factors as well.impartialobserver » 09 Jun 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Showing my conservative side today. We are having a debate about the Oakland A's major league baseball franchise possibly moving to Las Vegas. They want $380 to $425 million in public funds to build this new stadium. I am 100% opposed. Certain unnamed leaders want the prestige of saying, "I brought major league baseball to Las Vegas".. and then when you tell them pro sports is not a job creator, they smile and nod.
Skans » 09 Jun 2023, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Pro sports can be a job creator. However, it depends on a lot of things. The City/County involvement. Strength of investors. Control and quality of development. Location. Many other factors as well.
Let's take for example the Atlanta Braves moving from downtown Atlanta (Fulton County) to Cobb County, just north of Atlanta. Cobb County committed to financing $300 million to help with construction of the stadium. Now, an economics professor at Kennesaw State University has been critical of this move, claiming Cobb County’s decision to help the Braves move from downtown Atlanta is costing taxpayers nearly $15 million a year.
But, statistics tend to lie, and this professor has been forced to acknowledge that Cobb County has seen a boost in sales tax revenue during Braves' home games, but claims that about 75% of sales tax revenue generated at the property is from Truist Park (The stadium and basically right around the stadium), not the restaurants and shops at The Battery (right next to Truist Park). Not to mention the overall boost in business revenue on a daily basis and on weekends when the Braves aren't playing or when other events are taking place in the Stadium. The bottom line is that they way this area was re-developed, the entire area has become a thriving commercial success. I do believe that in years to come, it will be a net plus, not a net negative to Cobb County.
Other things that do not figure into the calculation is a lot of revitalization of Marietta and Smyrna in Cobb county as a result of the quality of Truist Park and The Battery.
This project is relatively new. You might want to study up on that one.
PS: One other thing to note is 1) where these people who want the new Stadium so much own land; 2) what land developers have contributed to their campaign and whether those developers own land near the proposed Stadium.
Your ilk are mealy mouthed, effeminate pieces of **** who are passive aggressive fruitcakes, child danger.
We throw him in with you, fruitcake. Like you, he defends tranny culture, waxing, and vaxing.Skans » 09 Jun 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Impartial Observer is conservative on some issues and more liberal on others. He's probably more of a libertarian. You can't throw him in with the leftists on this forum, that would be a mistake.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-anti ... ns/Several new protections for LGBTQ students and families were unveiled on Thursday by the Biden administration, including establishing a coordinator to "lead the charge" against banning books in schools, administration officials said.The yet-to-be-named Education Department coordinator will train school districts and advise them that banning books "may violate federal civil laws if they create a hostile environment for students," said White House domestic policy adviser Neera Tanden. Almost 1,500 instances of book banning in schools, affecting 874 different titles in the first half of this school year, according to PEN America's Index of School Book Bans, representing a nearly 30% increase over the previous school year.
There's nothing honest about you, puke.impartialobserver » 09 Jun 2023, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Back to the topic..
Who would these types fear the most? Tough question honestly.
The pretense that books which do not make the curriculum or library are "banned" is gay in a bad way.jerrab » 09 Jun 2023, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-anti ... ns/Several new protections for LGBTQ students and families were unveiled on Thursday by the Biden administration, including establishing a coordinator to "lead the charge" against banning books in schools, administration officials said.The yet-to-be-named Education Department coordinator will train school districts and advise them that banning books "may violate federal civil laws if they create a hostile environment for students," said White House domestic policy adviser Neera Tanden. Almost 1,500 instances of book banning in schools, affecting 874 different titles in the first half of this school year, according to PEN America's Index of School Book Bans, representing a nearly 30% increase over the previous school year.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.npr.org/2023/04/25/11720245 ... -libraries
- Another 41% of titles challenged or banned have content relating to LGBTQIA+ identity and themes, according to PEN.
- This dynamic has existed for decades. Famed novelist Judy Blume faced heavy scrutiny and calls for censorship in the 1980s for her books that discussed sexuality and self-image.
- The number one banned book is once again Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, a graphic memoir that follows Kobabe's journey into exploring their own gender and queer identity.
Cannonpointer » 09 Jun 2023, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑ There's nothing honest about you, puke.
They fear those of us who sneer at them.
Yup. If ya wanna know whom they fear, ask whom they attack.