Liberal Forum

Beekeeper, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

not now...not ever!  
 
 

maineman, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

             
 
 
 

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:22 am

Beekeeper, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

not now...not ever!  
 
 

Maybe beekeeper is like me, when apathetic about everyone's separate realities, I won't ignore, I just won't respond, until I am left with no options to stay out of stupidity on parade surrounding my time left equally evolving forward here.

I get put on ignore lists by those never accepting life in real time.

Nostradamus'omh » 28 Jun 2023, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:28 am

Maybe beekeeper is like me, when apathetic about everyone's separate realities, I won't ignore, I just won't respond, until I am left with no options to stay out of stupidity on parade surrounding my time left equally evolving forward here.

I get put on ignore lists by those never accepting life in real time.

The only folks I have on ignore are folks with some combination of racism, stupidity, stubbornness, willful ignorance, and the refusal to accept any source of news that does not confirm their biases.  

You may be unintelligible at times, and floating in the ozone, but you are none of those things above.  I sense you are a gentle soul intrigued by life.  

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:40 am

The only folks I have on ignore are folks with some combination of racism, stupidity, stubbornness, willful ignorance, and the refusal to accept any source of news that does not confirm their biases.  

You may be unintelligible at times, and floating in the ozone, but you are none of those things above.  I sense you are a gentle soul intrigued by life.

mainemop is projecting his own ignorance onto others.

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:40 am

The only folks I have on ignore are folks with some combination of racism, stupidity, stubbornness, willful ignorance, and the refusal to accept any source of news that does not confirm their biases.  

You may be unintelligible at times, and floating in the ozone, but you are none of those things above.  I sense you are a gentle soul intrigued by life. :)  

vague idealistic claptrap ^^^^^^^. I am an ancestor genetically being timed apart in my own skin in plain sight fully aware of what saving humanity did to my ancestry and doing to my family forward ignoring the one common thing at all costs for the price of believing life exceeds the moment here in every alternate reality destroying this species inside out.

It never occurs to your we mantra people I am trying to end corruption, not change how society can work to make living easier for all.

Physical Eternity is no more complicated than realizing compounding chromosomes exist in series parallel combinations of each ancestor changing current ;population forward now.

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:22 am

Beekeeper, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

not now...not ever!

You opened it **** YELLOW BABY **** COWARD!!

Sucks you think we believe you didn't!! Like you do ALL OF THEM, ******!!

How many COCKS did you suck off before they let you "push the button"??

               

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:40 am

The only folks I have on ignore are folks with some combination of racism, stupidity, stubbornness, willful ignorance, and the refusal to accept any source of news that does not confirm their biases.  

You may be unintelligible at times, and floating in the ozone, but you are none of those things above.  I sense you are a gentle soul intrigued by life.

Evidently mainbitch has himself on ignore. 
 

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:08 am

subsections (a) and (b) explicitly use the words "purpose" and "intent"  
subsections (c) mentions "purpose" but NOT "intent"
subsection (e), the one in the indictment, uses neither.  It only says, "the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States".
subsection (f), by the way, does not even require "reason to believe" but only "gross negligence"

If I wave my loaded pistol out of the window of my speeding car, I realize I COULD possibly injure some random pedestrian or passenger in another car.  No intent, just negligence.

If I stop the car, get out, and point the gun directly at a little old lady on the sidewalk, I INTEND to cause her injury.

Can you see the difference, @golfboy ?  Did you read this far?  

Repeating yourself isn't going to suddenly make you right, *******. 
 

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 7:18 am

sharing any secret documents around the nineteenth hole COULD damage the United States.  That's why they're classified "secret".

duh.

Trump isn't charged with showing them those documents.    
.
 

golfboy » 28 Jun 2023, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:59 am

Evidently mainbitch has himself on ignore.

@maineman  won't face me because she knows that KICKING HER *** WITH FACTS just isn't "debatable" in her little LWNJ world!!

Fact is, she is RUNNING FROM GETTING HER *** KICKED OVER AND OVER AND OVER!!

Most ****** with that BABY **** YELLOW COWARD STREAK RUNNING DOWN HER CUCKED *** do.

golfboy » 28 Jun 2023, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 9:00 am

Repeating yourself isn't going to suddenly make you right, *******.

running away from the text of the statute isn't going to suddenly make you right.

If you could prove me wrong, you would have by now.

golfboy » 28 Jun 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 9:01 am

Trump isn't charged with showing them those documents.    
.

of course he is, that is what 793 (e) is all about  somebody who "willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it"

golfboy » 28 Jun 2023, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:59 am

Evidently mainbitch has himself on ignore.

found intent in 793(e) yet?

maineman » 28 Jun 2023, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 9:04 am

running away from the text of the statute isn't going to suddenly make you right.

If you could prove me wrong, you would have by now.

What YOU FAILED TO REALIZE, PECKERPUFFER, IS THAT IT'S ALL THIS....

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg

roadkill » 09 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm

Before you watch the video remember...Biden had classified docs EVERYWHERE...and likely still does.

Hillary was subpoenaed to turn over emails, etc.  She wiped her illegal server and smashed cell phones to hide her crimes.

Remember when the left cried out about that?  Me neither.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pipp4MvN_c0

Here is my hot little take on this issue.

1. There was no reason for Trump to have these records.
2. There was no reason to NOT turn then back to the National Archives. 
3 .Trump is a MORON for talking about this crap on tape.
4. Trump having these documents is not that big of a deal since everyone in congress, other former presidents and vice presidents did the same thing and were not charged with a crime.
5. This is a pure political witch hunt.

The short take on this is Trump is a **** moron and **** the Democrats. 
 

golfboy » 28 Jun 2023, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:59 am

Evidently mainbitch has himself on ignore.

and I have to tell you... you are the lone exception to my rule.  You fill all the requirements of admission to my ignore list, but, because I KNOW you suffer from a fairly profound reading disability, I feel some degree of compassion for you and treat you differently than the rest of the MAGA morons on here.

Beekeeper » 28 Jun 2023, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 9:08 am

What YOU FAILED TO REALIZE, PECKERPUFFER, IS THAT IT'S ALL THIS....

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg

This hits the nail on the head. 

RayJJohnson » 28 Jun 2023, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 9:10 am

Here is my hot little take on this issue.

1. There was no reason for Trump to have these records.
2. There was no reason to NOT turn then back to the National Archives. 
3 .Trump is a MORON for talking about this crap on tape.
4. Trump having these documents is not that big of a deal since everyone in congress, other former presidents and vice presidents did the same thing and were not charged with a crime.
5. This is a pure political witch hunt.

The short take on this is Trump is a **** moron and **** the Democrats.

You have a right to yer own opinion but not yer own facts.


Why do you think the swamp and their media are so desperate to stop Trump...because Trump was exposing our corrupt government.

golfboy » 28 Jun 2023, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2023, 8:59 am

Evidently mainbitch has himself on ignore. 
 

that is why most are willing to die staying in social narratives legalizing self deception cradle to grave as a greater good scenario.

You should recognize it, doing it yourself.