Trump's intent was to expose the Deep State... which is exactly why they are going after him with guns blazing while giving their own a pass.golfboy » 09 Jun 2023, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑ The law requires intent to harm the United States.
Section 1: That (a) whoever, for the the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to the believe that the information to be obtained is to be used to injury of the United States
Good luck proving Trump intended to harm America.
they agreed the case had no merit. not worthy of their time...which exactly agrees with my daughter.golfboy » 09 Jun 2023, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ So SCOTUS didn't rule for, or agree with your daughter. They didn't even hear the case.
Once again, you lied. You're such a pathetic POS.
Turning down a case is not an endorsement of the lower court. *******.maineman » 09 Jun 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ they agreed the case had no merit. not worthy of their time...which exactly agrees with my daughter.
Trust you? YOU?maineman » 09 Jun 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ trust me. They didn't bother to hear the case. They dismissed it. And I will NOT spend any time whatsoever finding the link that proves that. My daughter sent it to me in an email months ago. You aren't worth the time to go find it. I mean, I really wouldn't cross the street to piss on you if you were on fire... I KNOW my daughter was vindicated by SCOTUS. you got ****.
And this is the best response you have, when the prosecutor has over-charged the President, because they are desperate to deflect from the exposure of Biden's corruption, and now they are under immense pressure to prove a crime was committed, when the clear letter of the law says no crime was committed.
But,but,but Biden! Hillary!
mainbitch can't tell us how prosecutors are going to prove Trump intended to harm the United States.
That lightweight child danger can't even prove whose boot is in his *** on any given day.golfboy » 09 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ mainbitch can't tell us how prosecutors are going to prove Trump intended to harm the United States.
Can you?
"‘WAR’: Kari Lake on Rocking Andrew Breitbart Shirt After Trump Indictment"RedheadedStranger » 09 Jun 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump's intent was to expose the Deep State... which is exactly why they are going after him with guns blazing while giving their own a pass.
Of course this is the "progressive" style of democracy that asshats like mainstain absolutely love... but what else would you expect from a guy that is perfectly okay with children being mutilated and abused.
RedheadedStranger » 09 Jun 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump's intent was to expose the Deep State... which is exactly why they are going after him with guns blazing while giving their own a pass.
Of course this is the "progressive" style of democracy that asshats like mainstain absolutely love... but what else would you expect from a guy that is perfectly okay with children being mutilated and abused.
I'm leaving that up to the special prosecutor.golfboy » 09 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ mainbitch can't tell us how prosecutors are going to prove Trump intended to harm the United States.
Can you?
Why do you always need someone else to say things are wrong, so you can hide behind believing what you were told possible. Real person or personreal stage name.roadkill » 09 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Before you watch the video remember...Biden had classified docs EVERYWHERE...and likely still does.
Hillary was subpoenaed to turn over emails, etc. She wiped her illegal server and smashed cell phones to hide her crimes.
Remember when the left cried out about that? Me neither.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pipp4MvN_c0
smith is a **** POS liar... he will burnSquatchman » 10 Jun 2023, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑ I'm leaving that up to the special prosecutor.
But ar first glance it looks like the stupid **** planned on using them for retribution against perceived enemies and to just plain show off.
Also note that trump didn't deny the charges he just pointed and cried witch hunt for your ilk to get you riled up.
Just think. Jack Smith isn't even done yet. He's looking into trump's involvement in the Jan.6th conspiracy charges and then the buffoon faces state charges in Georgia in the ekection interference case.
Ain't America great? Nobody is above the law here no matter how loudly they or their supporters cry.
Stop scorching the Earth with false promises and maybe your "we" won't burn anymore.
Nostradamus'omh » 10 Jun 2023, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑ Stop scorching the Earth with false promises and maybe your "we" won't burn anymore.
Edit didn't change anything except singling out one person as a scapegoat. I am including millions of people on each side of every side humanity got divided pretending now isn't eternity and historically life evolving never exceeds living in series parallel time displaced in plain sight ancestrally present.
Now we know why the FBI stalled last week to keep Congress from seeing the massive 10 million dollar bribery charge report against braindead biden.roadkill » 10 Jun 2023, 3:05 am » wrote: ↑ The left is engaged in the biggest gaslighting scam ever.
^^^^ another brilliant legal opinion from the dyslexic non-lawyergolfboy » 09 Jun 2023, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑ And this is the best response you have, when the prosecutor has over-charged the President, because they are desperate to deflect from the exposure of Biden's corruption, and now they are under immense pressure to prove a crime was committed, when the clear letter of the law says no crime was committed.
Of course she was. The opinion of the Maine Supreme Court and the Federal Appeals courts stand...and they vindicate her. Her decision had nothing to do with race, but rather education, and the appeals process validated that decision.golfboy » 09 Jun 2023, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Trust you? YOU?![]()
Declining to hear a case, is not dismissing it, *******.
SCOTUS has no responsibility to hear every case someone asks them to hear.
Your racist daughter wasn't vindicated.