Quite Easily ....
spot on. Just like the Espionage Act does not, in many instances require intent or purpose, it also does not require that actual harm had befallen the United States as an element of the crime.jerrab » 14 Jun 2023, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ you are so full of **** it is pathetic.
you are a traitor to the country like all trump supporters.
Our allies are SO much happier now that the clown is out of the Oval Office and Joe is in it.
No, there is a long list of unproven accusations ....just like this latest indictment .....which is just more election meddling using the optics of those accusations 24/7 until election night in 2024....
Wow...I heard tons.maineman » 14 Jun 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ I don't recall anyone claiming that proving Trump's collusion would be a slam dunk. I think you are thinking of George Tenet using that term to describe the certainty of Saddam's WMD's
Are they?maineman » 14 Jun 2023, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ Our allies are SO much happier now that the clown is out of the Oval Office and Joe is in it.
got any links to anyone saying that?neueregel » 14 Jun 2023, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Wow...I heard tons.
Yeah, plenty of people beating the drums about wars including but not limited to; Hillary, Biden....practically every Republican. Oddly enough, Trump didn't buy into it which explains why the deep state hates him so much. Don't stand against their wars.
Majik » 14 Jun 2023, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ No, there is a long list of unproven accusations ....just like this latest indictment .....which is just more election meddling using the optics of those accusations 24/7 until election night in 2024....
links?Majik » 14 Jun 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Are they?
Maybe the parties in control of those governments .....but not their electorates or their opposition party's....
how can US policy be sold?
Did you read Smith's indictment?Majik » 14 Jun 2023, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ No, there is a long list of unproven accusations ....just like this latest indictment .....which is just more election meddling using the optics of those accusations 24/7 until election night in 2024....
maineman » 14 Jun 2023, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ spot on. Just like the Espionage Act does not, in many instances require intent or purpose, it also does not require that actual harm had befallen the United States as an element of the crime.
Tell me ...maineman » 14 Jun 2023, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ Did you read Smith's indictment?
The first 31 counts prove themselves.
Are you REALLY having to ask THAT question??
Last I knew in the US one is still innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. You goddamn ****,, liberal idiots with terminal TDS, armchair lawyers already have him guilty. How many times can you cry "We got him now"? **** idiots!!!jerrab » 14 Jun 2023, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ let him prove his innocence by doodling on notepads.
his lawyers can't help him. they will all quit or else they will go to jail for lying. he has one person rooked for jail time.
There doesn't need to be one. Trump is not President. And, he tries to build his defense using the PRA, but the PRA concerns "Presidential Records" only. The first 31 counts of Jack Smith's indictment concern "Agency Records", which are NOT the property of the President, and are CERTAINLY not the property of a private citizen who USED TO BE the President. He had no right to have them. He had no right to show them to other people. He had no right to fail to return them when he was asked to do so.Majik » 14 Jun 2023, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Tell me ...
What's the precedent of President's handling top secret documents .....
U.S. foreign policy is sold all the time .....
I don't keep a library of quotes from posters and talking heads. In a couple of weeks, I'll forget you called this witch hunt a slam dunk as well. By then, we'll have moved on to the next tragedy.maineman » 14 Jun 2023, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ got any links to anyone saying that?
methinks what you think you "hear" might just be all in your head.
except...this time we do. 31 clear, unambiguous violations of the Espionage Act. that's 310 years in the joint!Buffalo » 14 Jun 2023, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ Last I knew in the US one is still innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. You goddamn ****,, liberal idiots with terminal TDS, armchair lawyers already have him guilty. How many times can you cry "We got him now"? **** idiots!!!
what exactly is "sold"? Do you have an example of such a "transaction"?Majik » 14 Jun 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ U.S. foreign policy is sold all the time .....
Just not as criminal as Biden as VP and his family did it by taking bribes ....Or Bill and Hillary via their foundation .....