Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"DOJ has one big problem with its Trump criminal case, legal expert says"
"DOJ has one big problem with its Trump criminal case, legal expert says"
By roadkill
9 Jun 2023 4:22 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 Jun 2023 10:38 am
What do the Kennedy assassination and the Trump 7 year witch-hunt have in common? Both POTUS’ thoughts and plans were outside the lines drawn by the military industrial corporations (JFK wanted peace with USSR and Casto and an end to Vietnam escalation) and the Deep State (DJT fought for Americans First at the expense of globalists and The Money behind the corruption in the federal government.). Both were/are not to be allowed in power. By any and all means necessary. This coming 18 month’s prior to the election will be as consequential time as ever in our history.
Trump's "indictment" is abuse of power and nothing else!!!
Trump's "indictment" is abuse of power and nothing else!!!
10 Jun 2023 10:48 am
That's right, the timing is a bit suspicious...Buffalo » 10 Jun 2023, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ Now we know why the FBI stalled last week to keep Congress from seeing the massive 10 million dollar bribery charge report against braindead biden.
The FBI didn't have Trump's indictment papers finished. Once written the FBI gave the go ahead for Congress to read the report and then dropped the indictment as cover for Fake News/braindead biden.
Braindead biden began stealing documents as a senator and hasn't stopped. Who knows what he has stolen since stealing the presidency!!! Maybe the FBI and DOJ should ask Burisma and Xi...
Braindead biden has not, to this date, even been interviewed by the special counsel "investigating" his stealing and soting of classified documents at the communist chinese funded Penn biden center and his garage in Delaware.
The duel system of justice is alive and well. Trump still causes the corrupt deep state sewer rats to **** in their pants.
But then again, i'ts no really a big surprise...
https://youtu.be/fvrwF-rczFk
In memory of Pumpkins
10 Jun 2023 10:56 am
Jantje_Smit » 10 Jun 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ That's right, the timing is a bit suspicious...
But then again, i'ts no really a big surprise...
https://youtu.be/fvrwF-rczFk
It's clear the dems are 3rd world Communists.
10 Jun 2023 12:23 pm
10 Jun 2023 12:34 pm
Instead of punting they took a voluntary handoff. Only Trump lied and obstructed, and is paying now the predictable price. See how easy the answer is to your question.roadkill » 10 Jun 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ Why did the DOJ punt when it came to Joe and Hillary? Jack...take yer time so you can formulate another lie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJY6ujWQPzQ
10 Jun 2023 12:37 pm
jack » 10 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Instead of punting they took a voluntary handoff. Only Trump lied and obstructed, and is paying now the predictable price. See how easy the answer is to your question.
You vote for liars and criminals who are seldom held accountable. How many hoaxes will the dems engage in before you wake up.
I predict you will never wake up. You probably still believe Hillary's Russian collusion hoax.
10 Jun 2023 12:45 pm
Never a relevant comment from you deadheads. You particularly.roadkill » 10 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ You vote for liars and criminals who are seldom held accountable. How many hoaxes will the dems engage in before you wake up.
I predict you will never wake up. You probably still believe Hillary's Russian collusion hoax.
10 Jun 2023 12:48 pm
jack » 10 Jun 2023, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Never a relevant comment from you deadheads. You particularly.
You ignore the crimes committed by Joe and Hillary. Yer nothing more than a useful tool.
10 Jun 2023 12:49 pm
You know that's totally wrong! Trump beats himself every time!golfboy » 09 Jun 2023, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Yea, because you're a now a legal expert too.
Madcow is already floating the idea that this was done so they could offer Trump a deal: Dropping case in exchange for him dropping out of the race.
Liberals are scared **** of Trump because they know they can't beat him.
And the only thing you beat is your meat! Hahahahah
10 Jun 2023 1:01 pm
nuckinfutz » 10 Jun 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑ You know that's totally wrong! Trump beats himself every time!
And the only thing you beat is your meat! Hahahahah
Mr. Centrist speaks.
10 Jun 2023 1:03 pm
You damn right, boy! And don't you forget it!
10 Jun 2023 1:04 pm
I won't Mr. Liar.
10 Jun 2023 1:08 pm
Don't get hatefull towards me, just because I am right most of the time!
It is you who lacks honesty.
10 Jun 2023 1:33 pm
If I had a dollar for every time I have heard that ... lol
10 Jun 2023 2:16 pm
NEILCAR » 10 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ If I had a dollar for every time I have heard that ... lol
mainesucker is projecting Joe and Hillary's crimes onto Trump.
10 Jun 2023 5:17 pm
Exactly as human intellect designed it, governed it into social fruition within every alternate reality existed and existing as ancestally practiced since dawn of civilization.Sumela » 10 Jun 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ WASH DC is run by criminals.
Its a .....DEM/RINO/MIC/AIPAC..... mafia.
Plausible deniability protects planned obsolescence, defending reasonable doubt manifested by theology of higher evolution beyond genetically timed apart reproductions alive now and evolution of reproductions eternally separating last arriving to replace their specific previous 4 generation gap of 30 DNA donors.
10 Jun 2023 5:36 pm
Nostradamus'omh » 10 Jun 2023, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ As your foot in your mouth your hands are free to post on message boards.
JuCo 5 percenter...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
11 Jun 2023 9:10 pm
If he does, than they are. Bill Clinton's precedent.jack » 10 Jun 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Well then, I guess we can look forward to Trump's defense that he considered nuclear top secrets his "personal records".
11 Jun 2023 9:10 pm
You said SCOTUS agreed with your daughter.maineman » 10 Jun 2023, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ Pretty simple. A trial judge, the Maine Supreme Court and the Federal Appeals Court all listened to the arguments made by the defense attorney and all found them without merit. All of them agreed that my daughter's rationale for disqualifying a juror based upon his lack of education did not violate the Batson rule. That's a fact.
You're a liar.
11 Jun 2023 9:11 pm
SCOTUS never even heard the case, so you lied when you claimed they agreed with her.maineman » 10 Jun 2023, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑ Of course she was. The opinion of the Maine Supreme Court and the Federal Appeals courts stand...and they vindicate her. Her decision had nothing to do with race, but rather education, and the appeals process validated that decision.
Who is online
In total there are 953 users online :: 14 registered, 15 bots, and 924 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, roadkill, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, Jantje_Smit, MR-7, *Beekeeper, murdock, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, 31st Arrival
Bots: Not, Yahoo! Slurp, curl/7, YandexBot, semantic-visions.com, CriteoBot, ADmantX, app.hypefactors.com, Mediapartners-Google, DuckDuckGo, proximic, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, BLEXBot, bingbot