Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2023, 2:05 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court DECLINED to become involved. The lower court's ruling - which CLEARLY favors trump, if it comments on the case at all, and which CLEARLY cannot help the prosecution - stood.
I already said this, but I will say it again. I don't think you understand the issues of EITHER case. The only common ground between the two cases - one having been a civil case and the other being criminal; one having been about gaining public access and the other being about denying public access - is that both cases hinge on the issue of presidential authority. Or so Trump's team believes, which is why they invoke the clinton sock drawer case. Whether the finding in the clinton sock drawer case will in FACT be relevant to Trump's case is yet to be litigated. If the finding IS relevant - likely, - it will favor Trump.
It is safer to be the sitting pretendodent's son that his political rival. That's how third world countries work.roadkill » 21 Jun 2023, 1:50 am » wrote: ↑ Did Obama give Biden permission when Joe was a senator? Check and checkmate.
Yes. It was a CIVIL case - and judicial watch lost, because the court found that Clinton's authority in the matter was absolute, which portends well for Trump and which is why his attorneys and advocates are bringing it up.jerrab » 21 Jun 2023, 2:10 am » wrote: ↑ do you know judicial watch (a group) sued nra to put clinton's tapes in clinton's presidential library?
Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2023, 2:08 am » wrote: ↑ Again, I don't think you are very informed about either case.
In your view, what is trump accused of losing?
no, nra won.Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2023, 2:14 am » wrote: ↑ Yes. It was a CIVIL case - and the NRA lost, because the court found that Clinton's authority in the matter was absolute, which portends well for Trump and which is why his attorneys and advocates are bringing it up.
Yes, Judicial Watch lost - NARA won.jerrab » 21 Jun 2023, 2:17 am » wrote: ↑ no, nra won.
nra did not want to put the tapes in the library.
judicial watch sued nra and took nra to court.
nra had already deemed the tapes personal,
Oh - he lost a MOTION.
Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2023, 2:13 am » wrote: ↑ It is safer to be the sitting pretendodent's son that his political rival. That's how third world countries work.
They stole the 2020 election, and now they are looking to steal his freedom, because you can only steal so many elections.
"Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose" - Kris Kristofferson, Poet Laureate of the Glorious Fourth Republic.
Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2023, 2:35 am » wrote: ↑ "Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose" - Kris Kristofferson, Poet Laureate of the Glorious Fourth Republic.
Look at you demanding people can hurt an ideology physically. Ideologies only physically exist when ancestors perform as the ideas life isn't what it does naturally here. Realities are self fulfilling behaviors because those performing them don't want to understand the actual time they exist is existing.maineman » 20 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Obsolute?
Is that like a shortcut aphasic, way of saying absolutely obsolete?
The clown would have to be a complete idiot (like you) to imagine that those 31 documents could NOT be used to the injury of the United States.
Then SHOW US where the ARCHIVIST is the one who makes a determination as to what is Presidential and which are PERSONAL, ****!!
Oh so NOW you are going to change your tune!! Trump has NEVER said anything OTHER than the records were declassified and HIS PERSONAL ONES!!jerrab » 20 Jun 2023, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑ he has already admitted that they are not all his personal documents.
You misread it.
Then you will have NO PROBLEM in providing a LINK TO HIM MAKING THAT STATEMENT, RIGHT???jerrab » 20 Jun 2023, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑ he has already admitted that they are not all his personal documents.
You misrepresent your actual genetic displacement. So anything you say is projected self deception of why you exist in the first place.maineman » 21 Jun 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ You misread it.
https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/6/14/ ... ument-case
----------------------------------Beekeeper » 21 Jun 2023, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ Then you will have NO PROBLEM in providing a LINK TO HIM MAKING THAT STATEMENT, RIGHT???
this is why one should never compromise with deniers of actual life. they won't change their mind and those within the mob mentality will eliminate anyone that can naturally debunk their history misleading people cradle to grave so far.jerra b » 21 Jun 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ ----------------------------------
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-b ... =100256459
Donald Trump on Monday suggested he had been too "busy" and wanted to be sure he'd retrieved his personal belongings before complying with the federal government's repeated demands -- and, eventually, a grand jury's subpoena -- that he return classified documents he took with him when he left the White House.
--------------------------------------------------
admitting they are not all his personal documents.
Astoundingly, your little girl link has an ACTUAL BUTTON which accesses "exlpainers" - clearly constructed for those who consider sorting things for themselves too onerous.maineman » 21 Jun 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ You misread it.
https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/6/14/ ... ument-case