Liberal Forum

RebelGator » 21 Jun 2023, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023, 4:34 pm

Transdependent: noun.....one who acts a part until the scheduled surgery can take hold.

 

Trump admitting on tape he didn't declassify the documents is pretty damning. The dogs just might catch their postal truck. Don't think they fathom the consequences.

jerra b » 21 Jun 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023, 1:45 pm

are you going to answer  the question?

A natural brain navigates within its proportionate time evolving.

Inquiring minds only want to know how to get away with denying how they exist in plain sight socially and it is done serving dictatorships or democracies.

Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2023, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023, 11:00 am

Here's a brief snippet from your gay homosexual queer link, gay homosexual queer:

Just imagine - laws that run off fruitcakes. Fruitcakes SHOULD be r-u-n-n-o-f-t.

They'll find safe haven in states like maine, fruity.

so...when you cannot argue the substance of the article that I linked to, you crawl away and attack the source of the link itself.

what a ******.  You should be ashamed, and, probably would be if you had any character.

run along now.  you really **** bore me

maineman » 21 Jun 2023, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023, 7:37 pm

so...when you cannot argue the substance of the article that I linked to, you crawl away and attack the source of the link itself.

I don't let weak dick suckers assign me a reading list, you old fairy.

I don't deal in talking points - save to debunk them, when the *** relying on them isn't too lazy to post them.

Cannonpointer » 21 Jun 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023, 7:44 pm

I don't let weak dick suckers assign me a reading list, you old fairy.

I don't deal in talking points - save to debunk them, when the *** relying on them isn't too lazy to post them.

the link debunked the sock drawer meme... I am not surprised you avoided it.  

And I am not entirely sure what mileage you think you get by calling a lifelong heterosexual ****** hound like me a fairy.  Do you think I give a **** that some loser whose life is running a backwater internet message board for the last ten years of his life from his mommy's basement  - and who has admitted to performing oral sex on TWO men - calls ME a fairy?  Funny ****.  Seriously.

My wife knows my sexual orientation.  So did my first wife and my three mistresses.  You've admitted you sucked cocks.  Whereas I've had my cocked sucked... and ALWAYS by hot women!    

maineman » 21 Jun 2023, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023, 8:09 pm

I rape kids slowly .....

cuz im a ****** hound

chasing 9 yr olds



 

   
 

maineman » 21 Jun 2023, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023, 8:09 pm

the link debunked the sock drawer meme...

No it didn't - not that I saw, 

I can give you TWO links UNdebunking it. But I'm not a dick sucking weasel that trades links.

If you're too lazy to even plagiarize your damned talking points, scuzzball, then we're in no position to compare the ideas I conceive to the ones you're too lazy to parrot - ferret.
 

maineman » 21 Jun 2023, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2023, 7:37 pm

so...when you cannot argue the substance of the article that I linked to, you crawl away and attack the source of the link itself.

what a ******.  You should be ashamed, and, probably would be if you had any character.

run along now.  you really **** bore me

WTF is the substance of your article? Combined shared social opinions in context of language arts on how to live greater than life existing in biological formed genetic ancestral results combined to numbers present sustains as eternally separated in plain sight.

Describe self evident results evolving here now without exceptions by interpreting life as reality, just actual time evolving since conceived to replace your own previous 4 generations lived to date? Each great great grandchild has the potential to reach becoming 1 of 16 great great grandparents since conceived..

100% chance you never will. Your mind is made up. Your brain is held hostage by societal evolutionists that will destroy anyone being honest about life as actually taking place as eternity sustains eternal separation without an intellectual designers casting doubt in every chain of command social order manifesting scenarios of anything else is possible.

Pick a side or get eliminated.

maineman » 20 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm

Obsolute?

Is that like a shortcut aphasic, way of saying absolutely obsolete?

The clown would have to be a complete idiot (like you) to imagine that those 31 documents could NOT be used to the injury of the United States.

Wow, mainbitch found a typo!   What a MAN!  
**** room temp ******.

Sorry bitch but intent means Trump would use them to hurt the United States.  
And you have no way to prove that, because even YOU know Trump loves America.

maineman » 19 Jun 2023, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2023, 9:55 pm

of course it did.  Silence speaks volumes.  If SCOTUS has wanted to weigh in on the case, they would have done so.  Their silence shows their tacit agreement with the lower courts.

Your daughter is a racist whore. 
 

maineman » 19 Jun 2023, 9:51 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2023, 9:51 pm

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer-

Why do you keep quoting the original version of this law, instead of the CURRENT version which I have quoted, and repeatedly provided you the link to the U.S. Government site, that maintains those records?

Is it because you're a lying POS?   Yes, I think it is. 
 

jerrab » 19 Jun 2023, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2023, 9:48 pm

not the same law as what trump is charged with.

It's the one you and mainbitch quoted.   Did you lie?
 

maineman » 19 Jun 2023, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2023, 9:48 pm

their laughter was under their breath.  but they did, in fact, decline to reverse the decisions of every other court in the land.

They did no such thing.  They declined to waste their time. 
 

golfboy » 22 Jun 2023, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2023, 8:07 pm

They did no such thing.  They declined to waste their time.

because there was no violation of the Batson rule, there.

yawn

golfboy » 22 Jun 2023, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2023, 8:03 pm

Wow, mainbitch found a typo!   What a MAN!  
**** room temp ******.

Sorry bitch but intent means Trump would use them to hurt the United States.  
And you have no way to prove that, because even YOU know Trump loves America.

intent is not an element of the crime.

golfboy » 22 Jun 2023, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2023, 8:04 pm

Your daughter is a racist whore.

your wife is a crack whore.

maineman » 22 Jun 2023, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2023, 9:41 pm

intent is not an element of the crime.

Then why does the law say it is?

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; 

You know, the part you keep deleting?

maineman » 22 Jun 2023, 9:44 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2023, 9:44 pm

your wife is a crack whore.

lol.  You don't know my wife.  Everyone knows your daughter is a racist whore, who kicked the ONLY black man off a black defendant's jury to ensure his conviction. 
 

golfboy » 22 Jun 2023, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2023, 9:46 pm

lol.  You don't know my wife.  Everyone knows your daughter is a racist whore, who kicked the ONLY black man off a black defendant's jury to ensure his conviction.

That is your unsupported biased opinion.  Not one court in the entire land  - all the way up to SCOTUS - agrees with you, however.  

There is that.