Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Jack Smith means business
Jack Smith means business
By Prospero
9 Jun 2023 6:46 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
9 Jun 2023 6:46 pm
Jack Smith set the table.
The meal is about to get eaten.
And Donald Trump is on the plate.
7 violations, 37 felony counts.
44 pages of incontrovertible incriminating evidence, This is an open and shut case. "In my opinion" (given the strength of the evidence)
Read the indictment. That is to say, if you care about EVIDENCE, you know, the kind that PROVES an allegation.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 53.3.0.pdf
In contains highly explosive and incriminating information.
I direct your attention to page 16, which is a transcript of the 'audio tape' that was reported on recently. Here, Trump is talking to a staffer, he admits that it's secret, he admits that he didn't declassify it but he could have if he were still president, and he shows it to the staffer, who does not have the clearance to review it, and the staffer comments on Trump's admission, with a 'Now we have a problem" and Trump replies, "Isn't that interesting?".
Before this, all I though we had was a 793 charge,and the obstruction charge, but on top of this, but here we have the president showing a classified document to someone without the required clearance. I don't know, off hand, what the charge is for that, but there are 37 counts, so a lot of ground is covered, but this takes it to another level, and the link to the full indictment is above and we all should read it. Anyway, this is what got Reality Winner a 5 year jail term on one document alone. This is NOT the case, as I understand it, with Pence or Biden.
The kind of recklessness revealed in this indictment clearly reveals Trump is not only a threat to Us National Security, he is wholly unfit for the office and the Republicans in the Senate had better get with the program and not let this man be the nominee for the GOP.
But, the jury pool will be West Palm Beach, lots of supporters there, and the judge might be Judge Cannon, she has been notoriously friendly to Trump.
For you whatabout Biden folks
The Grassley/Comer clown car has provided
1, Innuendo. Docs prove Hunter and friends, as private citizens conducted business abroad.
Shell companies are legal entities and ar not prima facie evidence of wrong doing. Such as to be corroborated.
The word of one Russian is not enough to warrant an indictment. Predication for query, that's it.
2. No evidence has yet been provided that Joe Biden received any funds from Hunter's business deals.
The Russian who says Biden received a Bribe. I saw no proof of it. His word alone is not proof. For all I know, maybe he has some kind of agenda.
The meal is about to get eaten.
And Donald Trump is on the plate.
7 violations, 37 felony counts.
44 pages of incontrovertible incriminating evidence, This is an open and shut case. "In my opinion" (given the strength of the evidence)
Read the indictment. That is to say, if you care about EVIDENCE, you know, the kind that PROVES an allegation.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 53.3.0.pdf
In contains highly explosive and incriminating information.
I direct your attention to page 16, which is a transcript of the 'audio tape' that was reported on recently. Here, Trump is talking to a staffer, he admits that it's secret, he admits that he didn't declassify it but he could have if he were still president, and he shows it to the staffer, who does not have the clearance to review it, and the staffer comments on Trump's admission, with a 'Now we have a problem" and Trump replies, "Isn't that interesting?".
Before this, all I though we had was a 793 charge,and the obstruction charge, but on top of this, but here we have the president showing a classified document to someone without the required clearance. I don't know, off hand, what the charge is for that, but there are 37 counts, so a lot of ground is covered, but this takes it to another level, and the link to the full indictment is above and we all should read it. Anyway, this is what got Reality Winner a 5 year jail term on one document alone. This is NOT the case, as I understand it, with Pence or Biden.
The kind of recklessness revealed in this indictment clearly reveals Trump is not only a threat to Us National Security, he is wholly unfit for the office and the Republicans in the Senate had better get with the program and not let this man be the nominee for the GOP.
But, the jury pool will be West Palm Beach, lots of supporters there, and the judge might be Judge Cannon, she has been notoriously friendly to Trump.
For you whatabout Biden folks
The Grassley/Comer clown car has provided
1, Innuendo. Docs prove Hunter and friends, as private citizens conducted business abroad.
Shell companies are legal entities and ar not prima facie evidence of wrong doing. Such as to be corroborated.
The word of one Russian is not enough to warrant an indictment. Predication for query, that's it.
2. No evidence has yet been provided that Joe Biden received any funds from Hunter's business deals.
The Russian who says Biden received a Bribe. I saw no proof of it. His word alone is not proof. For all I know, maybe he has some kind of agenda.
9 Jun 2023 6:52 pm
9 Jun 2023 7:00 pm
Jack Smith will be rebuked AGAIN by the Supreme Court.
Last time he got laughed out of the SCOTUS for interfering with a presidential election it was by 8-0.
Last time he got laughed out of the SCOTUS for interfering with a presidential election it was by 8-0.
9 Jun 2023 7:15 pm
9 Jun 2023 7:28 pm
Why are you comparing Biden's bribery scam to Trump's classified document woes?Prospero » 09 Jun 2023, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith set the table.
The meal is about to get eaten.
And Donald Trump is on the plate.
7 violations, 37 felony counts.
44 pages of incontrovertible incriminating evidence, This is an open and shut case. "In my opinion" (given the strength of the evidence)
Read the indictment. That is to say, if you care about EVIDENCE, you know, the kind that PROVES an allegation.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 53.3.0.pdf
In contains highly explosive and incriminating information.
I direct your attention to page 16, which is a transcript of the 'audio tape' that was reported on recently. Here, Trump is talking to a staffer, he admits that it's secret, he admits that he didn't declassify it but he could have if he were still president, and he shows it to the staffer, who does not have the clearance to review it, and the staffer comments on Trump's admission, with a 'Now we have a problem" and Trump replies, "Isn't that interesting?".
Before this, all I though we had was a 793 charge,and the obstruction charge, but on top of this, but here we have the president showing a classified document to someone without the required clearance. I don't know, off hand, what the charge is for that, but there are 37 counts, so a lot of ground is covered, but this takes it to another level, and the link to the full indictment is above and we all should read it. Anyway, this is what got Reality Winner a 5 year jail term on one document alone. This is NOT the case, as I understand it, with Pence or Biden.
The kind of recklessness revealed in this indictment clearly reveals Trump is not only a threat to Us National Security, he is wholly unfit for the office and the Republicans in the Senate had better get with the program and not let this man be the nominee for the GOP.
But, the jury pool will be West Palm Beach, lots of supporters there, and the judge might be Judge Cannon, she has been notoriously friendly to Trump.
For you whatabout Biden folks
The Grassley/Comer clown car has provided
1, Innuendo. Docs prove Hunter and friends, as private citizens conducted business abroad.
Shell companies are legal entities and ar not prima facie evidence of wrong doing. Such as to be corroborated.
The word of one Russian is not enough to warrant an indictment. Predication for query, that's it.
2. No evidence has yet been provided that Joe Biden received any funds from Hunter's business deals.
The Russian who says Biden received a Bribe. I saw no proof of it. His word alone is not proof. For all I know, maybe he has some kind of agenda.
Shouldn't we keep apples to apples and compare Trump's classified doc and Biden's classified doc "scandals" respectively and ask why one guy is facing a litany of charges while the other is getting a pass?
The Biden bribery scheme is a whole different deal.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
9 Jun 2023 8:02 pm
In Joey's offshore bank accounts I'm sure.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
9 Jun 2023 9:01 pm
NICE MARGARETProspero » 09 Jun 2023, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑
I POSTED ANOTHER BATCH OF FORUM GIBBERISH WASTING DATA
I DELETED IT
9 Jun 2023 9:44 pm
Evidence please.Warcok » 09 Jun 2023, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith will be rebuked AGAIN by the Supreme Court.
Last time he got laughed out of the SCOTUS for interfering with a presidential election it was by 8-0.
Thank you.
10 Jun 2023 5:54 am
**** YOU SHILLY, YOU NEVER GIVE EVIDENCE
10 Jun 2023 6:04 am
self evident results. You ever get tired of statistical averaged facts never providing anything conclusive in any direction beyond living here now.
10 Jun 2023 6:06 am
Nostradamus'omh » 10 Jun 2023, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑ self evident results. You ever get tired of statistical averaged facts never providing anything conclusive in any direction beyond living here now.
I give back what liberal assholes throw
10 Jun 2023 6:10 am
Action and reaction doing the same ****. when does anyone correct the wrong behavior? Not since dawn of civilization has anyone corrected people ignoring how genetics actually sustains eternal separation of lifetimes occupying time now.
I am the first one and most likely last one ever trying.
10 Jun 2023 6:11 am
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
You're just absolutely terrifying!
10 Jun 2023 6:12 am
10 Jun 2023 6:26 am
Whaaa!
The butt hurt rages on.
10 Jun 2023 6:39 am
What are the odds the "Smith" fellows gets disbarred when this is over?
10 Jun 2023 6:45 am
Smith apparently works for the UN and was brought in from the Netherlands? How are USA documents somehow UN business?
https://www.infowars.com/posts/the-arre ... -imminent/
Laughing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN2jqTilLOM
10 Jun 2023 6:52 am
Zero, as he was assigned the case.Nostradamus'omh » 10 Jun 2023, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ What are the odds the "Smith" fellows gets disbarred when this is over?
Trump has clearly violated the laws here, anyway.
10 Jun 2023 6:56 am
10 Jun 2023 7:00 am
Prospero » 09 Jun 2023, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith set the table.
The meal is about to get eaten.
And Donald Trump is on the plate.
7 violations, 37 felony counts.
44 pages of incontrovertible incriminating evidence, This is an open and shut case. "In my opinion" (given the strength of the evidence)
Read the indictment. That is to say, if you care about EVIDENCE, you know, the kind that PROVES an allegation.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 53.3.0.pdf
In contains highly explosive and incriminating information.
I direct your attention to page 16, which is a transcript of the 'audio tape' that was reported on recently. Here, Trump is talking to a staffer, he admits that it's secret, he admits that he didn't declassify it but he could have if he were still president, and he shows it to the staffer, who does not have the clearance to review it, and the staffer comments on Trump's admission, with a 'Now we have a problem" and Trump replies, "Isn't that interesting?".
Before this, all I though we had was a 793 charge,and the obstruction charge, but on top of this, but here we have the president showing a classified document to someone without the required clearance. I don't know, off hand, what the charge is for that, but there are 37 counts, so a lot of ground is covered, but this takes it to another level, and the link to the full indictment is above and we all should read it. Anyway, this is what got Reality Winner a 5 year jail term on one document alone. This is NOT the case, as I understand it, with Pence or Biden.
The kind of recklessness revealed in this indictment clearly reveals Trump is not only a threat to Us National Security, he is wholly unfit for the office and the Republicans in the Senate had better get with the program and not let this man be the nominee for the GOP.
But, the jury pool will be West Palm Beach, lots of supporters there, and the judge might be Judge Cannon, she has been notoriously friendly to Trump.
For you whatabout Biden folks
The Grassley/Comer clown car has provided
1, Innuendo. Docs prove Hunter and friends, as private citizens conducted business abroad.
Shell companies are legal entities and ar not prima facie evidence of wrong doing. Such as to be corroborated.
The word of one Russian is not enough to warrant an indictment. Predication for query, that's it.
2. No evidence has yet been provided that Joe Biden received any funds from Hunter's business deals.
The Russian who says Biden received a Bribe. I saw no proof of it. His word alone is not proof. For all I know, maybe he has some kind of agenda.
Here we go again....another Russia Russia Russia style hoax. The idea is to try to keep him out of the election....what next an act of congress to keep him from running?
^^this is the same kind of idiot that went around for years posting fake **** abut the russia hoax
Who is online
In total there are 4428 users online :: 8 registered, 13 bots, and 4407 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, jerra b, Cannonpointer, nefarious101
Bots: DuckDuckBot, okhttp, ADmantX, proximic, YandexBot, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, CriteoBot, bingbot, Googlebot, Baiduspider, curl/7