Okay, show me the quote where he said that.roadkill » 10 Jun 2023, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith is a democrat who said no one is above the law...except Joe and Hillary.
I thought the one informing you, you've got AIDS, showed a lot of promise. Low calibre OP = low calibre responses - we've all read the indictment ourselves. Repetition is not insight. The accusations in the indictment weren't formulated in a morning, so equally, responses to the accusations in the indictment will take time. An indictment is not a verdictProspero » 10 Jun 2023, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Not one intelligent/competent rebuttal to my OP in this entire thread.
This forum is a veritable Confederacy of Dunces (with respect to [RIP] John Kennedy Toole)
And don't both accusing me of same, that's called a cop out.
Given the caliber of your response, no doubt your reply to this will be equally incompetent, and/or childish, if not worse.
So please pester someone else who has you confused with being smart.
RedheadedStranger » 10 Jun 2023, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Smith is a very One World Government type for sure.
He has even made the statement that prosecuting Trump is meant to "set an example to the world"... what ever the hell that means.
I'm pretty sure the message is supposed to be that any who dare question the Authority of the Ruling Class of the NWO will be dealt with swiftly and without rebuttal.
He looks like General Zod from the 1978 Superman movie.
the little kids you molest never grow up because you give them aids
Nostradamus'omh » 10 Jun 2023, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑ You only aid social chaos and ancestral misery because you loathe the time limits your sole reproduction gets since conceived your brain navigates 24/7 and your social conscience ignores every rotation of the planet your body is never same total sum evolving this long.
**** logic.JustinSane » 11 Jun 2023, 3:49 am » wrote: ↑ I thought the one informing you, you've got AIDS, showed a lot of promise. Low calibre OP = low calibre responses -
What are you talking about? The indictment is the OP.we've all read the indictment ourselves. Repetition is not insight. The accusations in the indictment weren't formulated in a morning, so equally, responses to the accusations in the indictment will take time. An indictment is not a verdict
Incompetent rebuttal-- Ad homs have no argumentative value.
Bob » 11 Jun 2023, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑ Control of the executive branch of USA government.
https://banned.video/watch?id=64839bb7492826dd9d4334fb
Incompetent rebuttal; comment not substantive and is of no argumentative value.Bob » 11 Jun 2023, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Looks like the type of person that would try to defeat me with a first punch in a parking lot but then ends up getting brain tenderized in a fight that they wished they had never started.
Prospero » 11 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Incompetent rebuttal-- Ad homs have no argumentative value.
In other news...
https://i1.wp.com/angry.net/blog2/wp-co ... ndwich.jpg
You DO seem the type to lead the Moorish Resistance League, Ignatius.Prospero » 10 Jun 2023, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑
This forum is a veritable Confederacy of Dunces (with respect to [RIP] John Kennedy Toole)
And don't both accusing me of same, that's called a cop out.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Prospero » 10 Jun 2023, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Not one intelligent/competent rebuttal to my OP in this entire thread.
And yet, you are known for relying on them.Prospero » 11 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Incompetent rebuttal-- Ad homs have no argumentative value.
One track mantras always seem airtight with people minding a social consensus of "We believe our side is a better reality than everyone else's.".Prospero » 11 Jun 2023, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ **** logic.
What are you talking about? The indictment is the OP.
Looks air tight to me.
Read the indictment, oh dispenser of profound prosodic prose.Nostradamus'omh » 12 Jun 2023, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑ One track mantras always seem airtight with people minding a social consensus of "We believe our side is a better reality than everyone else's.".
Evolving happens same way for all sides. How they deal with it cradle to grave divides the species inside out each generation gap left alive.
From sibling rivalries to eternal conflicting opinions between ideologies governing every tomorrow, arriving here, today 24/7.
Rule of law defends disciples of reasonable doubt and devil's advocates to evil live and in details governing tomorrows life is only evolving here now genetics sustain the numbers adapting to the moment here as ancestrally positioned into 5 categories of generation gaps present.Prospero » 12 Jun 2023, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑ Read the indictment, oh dispenser of profound prosodic prose.
Prospero » 11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Incompetent rebuttal; comment not substantive and is of no argumentative value.