Best things in life come from understanding how living works as evolving time as naturally here. Paranoia comes to a person of character because their brain evolved from the nucleus of their fertilized cell containing two ancestral sets of DNA since inception of this species.Prospero » 12 Jun 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ Are these profligate profundities pro bono?
I hope so, I wouldn't pay more than a wooden nickel for it.
Bob » 12 Jun 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ Overruled, the corporation group has become Incompetent Irrelevant, Immaterial and blatantly ignorant after consuming numerous toxins that it sells to the general public.
Great philosophy among consensus mentalities that would destroy anyone defying their will do anything to prevent anyone from taking away their power of suggesting life exceeds evolving forward now.Prospero » 12 Jun 2023, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I disagree. Reality is an abstraction, and, as such, cannot 'intend', intentionally, or otherwise.
Check.
Ah, behold the grandiloquence of our dear Nostradamus, the master of verbosity and the herald of pretentiousness! He weaves a tapestry of convoluted sentences, adorning his words with an air of profundity, all in an attempt to impress those who dare to listen. But fear not, dear friends, for we shall embark on a circumlocutionary journey through the labyrinth of his self-aggrandizing proclamations.Nostradamus'omh » 12 Jun 2023, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ Best things in life come from understanding how living works as evolving time as naturally here. Paranoia comes to a person of character because their brain evolved from the nucleus of their fertilized cell containing two ancestral sets of DNA since inception of this species.
Simple compounding chromosomes making each reproduction equally created as any previous generation arrived to current populaiton present in ever changing forms shaped as conceived in the likeness of their previous 4 generation gaps.
Gee God made man in his own image. 93.75% DNA dominant genes arrived from 16 great great grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 4 grandparents, 2 parenting the new additions to ever changing population left alive now until no more great great grandchildren keep arriving one a t a time here, native to this atmosphere and lineage making the conception.
Accountability Propero, your choice to continue ignoring it.
Why did you use ad hominem? I thought you said that was naughty?Prospero » 12 Jun 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ You're so dull, roadkill, but, then again, you chose 'roadkill' as your handle.
You ever consider taking your finger out of it?
wow just describing the evolving process naturally eternally separating the ancestors occupying time inhabiting space specifically here creates such rebuttals from people minding possibilities there is not such thing as something being impossible demanding human rights to remove anyone discussing the actual impossibility living exceeds evolving here now.Prospero » 12 Jun 2023, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ Ah, behold the grandiloquence of our dear Nostradamus, the master of verbosity and the herald of pretentiousness! He weaves a tapestry of convoluted sentences, adorning his words with an air of profundity, all in an attempt to impress those who dare to listen. But fear not, dear friends, for we shall embark on a circumlocutionary journey through the labyrinth of his self-aggrandizing proclamations.
Oh, how the best things in life are said to spring forth from the depths of Nostradamus' understanding! For he believes himself to be a scholar of the highest order, the custodian of timeless wisdom that eludes the common folk. He speaks of "living works as evolving time," as if time itself were a machine, ticking and tocking to the beat of his erudition.
But let us not forget the bane of Nostradamus' existence: paranoia. He fancies himself a person of character, as his brain supposedly evolved from the nucleus of a fertilized cell. He proudly boasts of two ancestral sets of DNA, tracing his lineage back to the inception of our species. Oh, what a pedigree he possesses, with each generation compounding chromosomes and reproductions equally created!
In his mind, Nostradamus is a living testament to the divine, a vessel molded in the image of God Himself. He solemnly declares that 93.75% of his DNA is dominated by the genes of his great great grandparents, his great grandparents, his grandparents, and his parents. Such precise calculations, as if he were a geneticist of unparalleled prowess!
And yet, amidst this convoluted tale of ancestry and genetic proportions, Nostradamus fails to address a crucial matter—accountability. He accuses our dear Yours Truly, our prodigious paragon, of ignoring it. Oh, the irony! The one who claims to possess unparalleled knowledge disregards the very concept of accountability.
So, let us revel in the whimsical nature of Nostradamus' grandiloquence. For while he may dazzle with his elaborate rhetoric, we can see through the charade, knowing that true wisdom lies not in obfuscation but in simplicity. And as we partake in his not-so-cogent cognizance, we bid farewell to Nostradamus, the master of pretentiousness, and embrace the joy of laughter in all its glory. Fare thee well, nostra....nostra......whatever the hell it was.....
Prospero » 12 Jun 2023, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ Ah, behold the grandiloquence of our dear Nostradamus, the master of verbosity and the herald of pretentiousness! He weaves a tapestry of convoluted sentences, adorning his words with an air of profundity, all in an attempt to impress those who dare to listen. But fear not, dear friends, for we shall embark on a circumlocutionary journey through the labyrinth of his self-aggrandizing proclamations.
Oh, how the best things in life are said to spring forth from the depths of Nostradamus' understanding! For he believes himself to be a scholar of the highest order, the custodian of timeless wisdom that eludes the common folk. He speaks of "living works as evolving time," as if time itself were a machine, ticking and tocking to the beat of his erudition.
But let us not forget the bane of Nostradamus' existence: paranoia. He fancies himself a person of character, as his brain supposedly evolved from the nucleus of a fertilized cell. He proudly boasts of two ancestral sets of DNA, tracing his lineage back to the inception of our species. Oh, what a pedigree he possesses, with each generation compounding chromosomes and reproductions equally created!
In his mind, Nostradamus is a living testament to the divine, a vessel molded in the image of God Himself. He solemnly declares that 93.75% of his DNA is dominated by the genes of his great great grandparents, his great grandparents, his grandparents, and his parents. Such precise calculations, as if he were a geneticist of unparalleled prowess!
And yet, amidst this convoluted tale of ancestry and genetic proportions, Nostradamus fails to address a crucial matter—accountability. He accuses our dear Yours Truly, our prodigious paragon, of ignoring it. Oh, the irony! The one who claims to possess unparalleled knowledge disregards the very concept of accountability.
So, let us revel in the whimsical nature of Nostradamus' grandiloquence. For while he may dazzle with his elaborate rhetoric, we can see through the charade, knowing that true wisdom lies not in obfuscation but in simplicity. And as we partake in his not-so-cogent cognizance, we bid farewell to Nostradamus, the master of pretentiousness, and embrace the joy of laughter in all its glory. Fare thee well, nostra....nostra......whatever the hell it was.....
If the indictment is the OP, would you agree your input has been zero, since you didn't write it?.. I'd call zero input, a low quality postProspero » 11 Jun 2023, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ **** logic.
What are you talking about? The indictment is the OP.
Looks air tight to me.
Prospero » 09 Jun 2023, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith set the table.
The meal is about to get eaten.
And Donald Trump is on the plate.
7 violations, 37 felony counts.
44 pages of incontrovertible incriminating evidence, This is an open and shut case. "In my opinion" (given the strength of the evidence)
Read the indictment. That is to say, if you care about EVIDENCE, you know, the kind that PROVES an allegation.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 53.3.0.pdf
In contains highly explosive and incriminating information.
Well, well, I wondered HOW LONG it would take you so I can BITCH SLAP this one where it belongs and IS going in any courtroom!!I direct your attention to page 16, which is a transcript of the 'audio tape' that was reported on recently. Here, Trump is talking to a staffer, he admits that it's secret, he admits that he didn't declassify it but he could have if he were still president, and he shows it to the staffer, who does not have the clearance to review it, and the staffer comments on Trump's admission, with a 'Now we have a problem" and Trump replies, "Isn't that interesting?".
You are going to make the orange New York real-estate carnival barker a political martyr. Dogs chasing the postal truck. Catching the truck doesn't usually end well for the dogs.Xavier_Onassis » 12 Jun 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith's team investigated Trump's behavior regarding the stolen documents and they turned up the tape. It reveals in Trump's voice that he knew that he did not legally own a document and could not legally show it to anyone. It is germane to the subject that Trump had criminal intent and cannot claim ignorance of the law. I am pretty sure that it will be presented to the jury.
Go ahead, bitch slap your own dumb self, bee man.
I, personally, by posting in this rather obscure forum, going to make a martyr of Trump?Neo » 12 Jun 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You are going to make the orange New York real-estate carnival barker a political martyr. Dogs chasing the postal truck. Catching the truck doesn't usually end well for the dogs.
Collective 'you'.Xavier_Onassis » 12 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I, personally, by posting in this rather obscure forum, going to make a martyr of Trump?
Trump is a despicable human being, he is the son and grandson of despicable men. I do not want to make a martyr of trump, I want to make a convicted felon of Trump, because the SOB deserves it,
But do I have the power to do this. Alas, I do not.
The topic here is as follows, pay attention.
Jack Smith has a tape of Trump admitting that he broke the law and was bragging about it.
Bee Man says that the tape is no admissible as evidence. I say it sure as Hell is. It proves intent.
That is the issue. I am not a dog chasing a postal truck.
I will suffer no consequences for stating that I am sure that the tape will be admissible evidence and will be submitted as such. Zero, nada niente, bupkiss.
Pssst. Dr, PEDO.Xavier_Onassis » 12 Jun 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith's team investigated Trump's behavior regarding the stolen documents and they turned up the tape. It reveals in Trump's voice that he knew that he did not legally own a document and could not legally show it to anyone. It is germane to the subject that Trump had criminal intent and cannot claim ignorance of the law. I am pretty sure that it will be presented to the jury.
Go ahead, bitch slap your own dumb self, bee man.
Separation of words dumb, stupid, ignorant.Xavier_Onassis » 12 Jun 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith's team investigated Trump's behavior regarding the stolen documents and they turned up the tape. It reveals in Trump's voice that he knew that he did not legally own a document and could not legally show it to anyone. It is germane to the subject that Trump had criminal intent and cannot claim ignorance of the law. I am pretty sure that it will be presented to the jury.
Go ahead, bitch slap your own dumb self, bee man.
NO INDICTMENT UNDER THE ESPIONAGE ACT, UNLETTERED IDIOT!!!Prospero » 09 Jun 2023, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith set the table.
The meal is about to get eaten.
And Donald Trump is on the plate.
7 violations, 37 felony counts.
44 pages of incontrovertible incriminating evidence, This is an open and shut case. "In my opinion" (given the strength of the evidence)
Read the indictment. That is to say, if you care about EVIDENCE, you know, the kind that PROVES an allegation.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 53.3.0.pdf
In contains highly explosive and incriminating information.
I direct your attention to page 16, which is a transcript of the 'audio tape' that was reported on recently. Here, Trump is talking to a staffer, he admits that it's secret, he admits that he didn't declassify it but he could have if he were still president, and he shows it to the staffer, who does not have the clearance to review it, and the staffer comments on Trump's admission, with a 'Now we have a problem" and Trump replies, "Isn't that interesting?".
Before this, all I though we had was a 793 charge,and the obstruction charge, but on top of this, but here we have the president showing a classified document to someone without the required clearance. I don't know, off hand, what the charge is for that, but there are 37 counts, so a lot of ground is covered, but this takes it to another level, and the link to the full indictment is above and we all should read it. Anyway, this is what got Reality Winner a 5 year jail term on one document alone. This is NOT the case, as I understand it, with Pence or Biden.
The kind of recklessness revealed in this indictment clearly reveals Trump is not only a threat to Us National Security, he is wholly unfit for the office and the Republicans in the Senate had better get with the program and not let this man be the nominee for the GOP.
But, the jury pool will be West Palm Beach, lots of supporters there, and the judge might be Judge Cannon, she has been notoriously friendly to Trump.
For you whatabout Biden folks
The Grassley/Comer clown car has provided
1, Innuendo. Docs prove Hunter and friends, as private citizens conducted business abroad.
Shell companies are legal entities and ar not prima facie evidence of wrong doing. Such as to be corroborated.
The word of one Russian is not enough to warrant an indictment. Predication for query, that's it.
2. No evidence has yet been provided that Joe Biden received any funds from Hunter's business deals.
The Russian who says Biden received a Bribe. I saw no proof of it. His word alone is not proof. For all I know, maybe he has some kind of agenda.