Skans » 20 Jun 2023, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ Perhaps. But, what I know is that leftists tend to breed more leftists - they get worse with each generation. Overall, I have little concern or compassion for the children of leftists. If they self-mutilate and destroy themselves, I admit, I grin a little inside.
Forced sterilization should be a prerequisite for getting an abortion, that's a given and really another subject. When leftists take it upon themselves to destroy their ability to effectively reproduce, I find solace in that. It is like a cancer eating the host and destroying itself. Is that not a natural and fitting outcome?
I too would like to defeat "this government", for some of the same reasons you would. I just don't want to replace it with a fascist government.FOS » 20 Jun 2023, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ leftist already fail to reproduce. the next generation of leftists is a product of government enforced ideology. this society can indeed take a decent person with good potential and transmogrify them into a leftist. if we defeat this government then we would no longer need to pretend that it is possible to be 'born in the wrong body' or change your biological sex.
Skans » 20 Jun 2023, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ I too would like to defeat "this government", for some of the same reasons you would. I just don't want to replace it with a fascist government.
Well, I have as little interest in communists and theocrats ruling me as I do fascists. I only mention fascism because, from previous discussions, I know that is the system you would like to see installed should the present one ever be destroyed.FOS » 20 Jun 2023, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ your sentiment is probably the most common one. But here is one thing that is clear: this system does not fear communists...it does not fear monarchists. it does not fear theocrats. The only revolutionary ideology this system REALLY fears is fascists. Fascism is the kryptonite to the modern neo liberal order. everything else can be absorbed and coopted.
Skans » 20 Jun 2023, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Well, I have as little interest in communists and theocrats ruling me as I do fascists. I only mention fascism because, from previous discussions, I know that is the system you would like to see installed should the present one ever be destroyed.
How does anyone gaslighting and sexualizing children have any "good intention"? lolNEILCAR » 20 Jun 2023, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ No matter how well your intention are
.. the end result if mutilation of children's bodies
.... The children's minds are still developing... any sex change surgery should be after the age of 18.
yup it’s a **** showNEILCAR » 20 Jun 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ After watch biden's economic program I would politely suggest that the Republican's monetary policy looks pretty good.
A lib Dem controlled city Baltimore has 21 school districts and not one child was proficient in math... Not one. I would suggest that these teachers (nor the dem's in Baltimore) are not the people I want making decisions regarding the sexuality of my children ...
gaslighting there’s that word againCannonpointer » 20 Jun 2023, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ How does anyone gaslighting and sexualizing children have any "good intention"? lol
It's not only surgery they want to inflict onn children. They also want to sell them the chemical castration regime they were paid by government to develop for sex offenders, relabelled "puberty blocker regime."
It's about MARKET. Instead of creating products for market, the create market for products.
Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ This - all of it. ^
But the dems have to own and correct their stupid **** that they ALL allowed ot fester in THEIR camps and THEIR ranks, or else the rest of us have to - and the rest of us will rightly and resoundingly reject dem ***.
Y'all can't steal EVERY election.
jerrab » 20 Jun 2023, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ I have heard democrats have complained out biden's trans agenda, which they did not expect.
Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ This - all of it. ^
But the dems have to own and correct their stupid **** that they ALL allowed ot fester in THEIR camps and THEIR ranks, or else the rest of us have to - and the rest of us will rightly and resoundingly reject dem ***.
Y'all can't steal EVERY election.
Have you heard any pledging to withhold their votes from their scumbag, child-disturbing party?jerrab » 20 Jun 2023, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ I have heard democrats have complained out biden's trans agenda, which they did not expect.
The democ rats' last two offerings as pResident were hitlery klingon (The It's her turn" ticket) and pedo-joe (The "lock up your chidren" ticket).jerrab » 20 Jun 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ joe manchin is not a fan of biden's transgender agenda. but he is not running in the primary against biden, if he did he could win.

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The democ rats' last two offerings as pResident were hitlery klingon (The It's her turn" ticket) and pedo-joe (The "lock up your chidren" ticket).
If they nominated David Duke - with a proper mea culpa and a pinky swear to abide by democ rat principles (like THAT's a thing...), in your view, would most democ rats vote a Duke ticket? Say, with someone from NAMBLA as his running mate? A black guy from NAMBLA - I wanna make this difficult.
Your party is way too old and white to attract republicans. They like a little youth and diversity on their ticket.jerrab » 20 Jun 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know. I am pretty confident I would vote for joe manchin. he did not want boys on girls team and not that pro abortion which might get republican cross over votes.

more about joe manchinCannonpointer » 20 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The democ rats' last two offerings as pResident were hitlery klingon (The It's her turn" ticket) and pedo-joe (The "lock up your chidren" ticket).
If they nominated David Duke - with a proper mea culpa and a pinky swear to abide by democ rat principles (like THAT's a thing...), in your view, would most democ rats vote a Duke ticket? Say, with someone from NAMBLA as his running mate? A black guy from NAMBLA - I wanna make this difficult.
why I think manchin would get republican voters,Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Your party is way too old and white to attract republicans. They like a little youth and diversity on their ticket.
And most republicans find the democ rats WAY too cozy with wall street.
Imgreatagain » 20 Jun 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Why anyone would give up being a man is beyond me. Being a man is like winning the lottery
One sane fellow in your party is tokenism.jerrab » 20 Jun 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ why I think manchin would get republican voters,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsroom ... rtion-rule
Manchin Was Only Democratic Cosponsor Of The Bicameral Joint Resolution Of DisapprovalWashington, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, cosponsored and voted in favor of a bicameral joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to block an illegal U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rule that provides abortion services through the taxpayer-funded VA healthcare system. This morning, Senator Manchin held a press conference with his fellow cosponsors, Senators Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) and Roger Marshall (R-KS), on their efforts to block the rule.
“The VA’s current policy is a blatant violation of federal law,” said Senator Manchin. “Since 1976, there has been bipartisan consensus on the Hyde Amendment because most Americans agree that we should not be using taxpayer dollars to provide abortion services. This rule exceeds the VA’s statutory authority and is another example of the Biden Administration’s growing pattern of prioritizing a political agenda over Constitutional processes. I always have and always will fight to maintain the commonsense protections we’ve had in place for decades to ensure federal tax dollars cannot be used to fund abortions.”