Kind of like persons that only debate by whether true or false defining possibilities rather than actual evolving in real time whether or not, weather or climate by latitude between equator and two polar areas being opposite seasons each solstice and equinox.maineman » 20 Jun 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ IMHO, people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate should refrain from prognosticating about the latter.
When 100% of all "climate predictions" have FAILED TO MATERIALIZE, then perhaps YOU TOO should shut the **** up about anything "Climate" since you fully support these pseudo-scientists who have made these "predictions".maineman » 20 Jun 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ IMHO, people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate should refrain from prognosticating about the latter.
It doesn't mean the science is fake, just that the outcome was a nullity. Science can be real, even when experimental data is correlated or negatively correlated to the hypothesis.Beekeeper » 20 Jun 2023, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ When 100% of all "climate predictions" have FAILED TO MATERIALIZE, then perhaps YOU TOO should shut the **** up about anything "Climate" since you fully support these pseudo-scientists who have made these "predictions".
Since all science IS predictive, FAILED PREDICTIONS means the SCIENCE IS FAKE AND FALSE!!
See how easy this is.
Weather+Time=Climate. *******!!maineman » 20 Jun 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ IMHO, people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate should refrain from prognosticating about the latter.
Weather plus evolving doesn't exceed the moment here is the distance between each whether event humanity forces upon each generation gap added each great great grandchild changing the population forward one at a time in series parallel arrival now.