one sided expectations everything goes as planned, but evolving never exceeds only taking place here in this moment nothing living duplicates what arrived already working same way constantly.razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ $17.50 per hour is $33,000 per year thus $35 per hour is $66,000 per year which would eliminate the need for food stamps for a ton of people.
What's wrong with that?
And $66,000 a year would push up economic growth which is a good thing.
What's wrong with that?
If CEO's would cut their salaries by 50% and eliminate golden parachutes the cost of goods would not increase
paying workers $66,000 a year.
razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ $17.50 per hour is $33,000 per year thus $35 per hour is $66,000 per year which would eliminate the need for food stamps for a ton of people.
What's wrong with that?
And $66,000 a year would push up economic growth which is a good thing.
What's wrong with that?
If CEO's would cut their salaries by 50% and eliminate golden parachutes the cost of goods would not increase
paying workers $66,000 a year.
hey numbnuts, when technology reduces the numbers needed to work the job sustaining the harvesting of raw materials to finished goods, and most retailers setup self serve marketplaces, there won't be jobs considered essential, so any crisis ruling elites proclaim taking place can shut down the whole "country" for the sake of safety for everyone defending their self inflicted reality to extinction.razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ YOU tell me.......
If CEO's would cut their salaries by 50% and eliminate golden parachutes the cost of goods would not increase
paying workers $66,000 a year.
So you LOVE some Marx's COMMUNIST MANIFESTO crap!!!razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ If the CEO would take a cut in an obscene pay package then put two poor people to work those two poor people are no longer poor hopefully....... that is helping poor people.
Obscene pay packages are not necessary ........ they are ego inflaters.
What is required of the attendant working the self serve gas station ALONE AT NIGHT OR DAY that will be fired if they break policy and protocol? Jobs are plenty, keeping one is next to impossible now-a-days.Z09 » 19 Jun 2023, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ So...
How much is the price of gasoline now if the attendant gets 32.00 a hour?
So you are UNABLE to justify your $35 an hour wage with REAL LIFE NUMBERS!!razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ The cost of wages are split between hundreds of items or some cases thousands of items..........FYI I am a former buyer/manager in retail grocery. My letters of reference always indicated my ability to make money for the "company".
IF that mom and pop sandwich shop is even able to stay in business...Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2023, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ So you LOVE some Marx's COMMUNIST MANIFESTO crap!!!
Not hard to see who the REAL COMMIES ARE ON THE FORUM and that would be YOU BOZOO!!!
Here's a FACT for you. 95% of ALL BUSINESS in this nation is SMALL BUSINESSES owned by MIDDLE CLASS WORKING PEOPLE. NOT "CEOs" who run BIG CORPORATIONS.
SO if the mom and pop sandwich shop have to pay their 2 employees $35 an hour, how much does THEIR HOTDOGS have to sell for if they make and sell 10 an hour?? AND you need to calculate a rough figure for RENT, TAXES, UTILITIES, Payroll taxes, and inventory to make the sandwiches too, included spoilage.
Now THAT'S an easy one, ****!!
Let me give you an economic situation that is as flexible as evolving forward in real time.razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ $17.50 per hour is $33,000 per year thus $35 per hour is $66,000 per year which would eliminate the need for food stamps for a ton of people.
What's wrong with that?
And $66,000 a year would push up economic growth which is a good thing.
What's wrong with that?
If CEO's would cut their salaries by 50% and eliminate golden parachutes the cost of goods would not increase
paying workers $66,000 a year.
What is the current inflation rate on groceries? How long do those making that wage keep their job in retail where the stores are always changing times a person works so it is next to impossible to find a second job when only scheduled 20 to 30 hours a week. And time working changes every week.razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ Stop bitching about food stamps and pay all workers no less than 17.50 per hour .......... which might make some still eligible for assistance depending on residential location.
Some grocery stores do pay very good wages by the way ...... $20.00 per hour or more. This is real life.
Whom decides which ancestors arrive next or previous generations die first? Nobody, life evolves without intellectual intervention and what human intellectual intervention already applied corrupted every ancestor living here now.Z09 » 19 Jun 2023, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ Also Razoo...
You want to cut the pay of CEO's?
Who decides how much someone can make?
Tell us...
Is it AOC and Bernie Sanders..
Should they decide?
You not only DRANK THE KOOKAID, you also SWALLOWED THE BUCKET OF **** you propagandists SHOVED DOWN YOUR THROAT and UP YOUR ARSE!!razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ Stop bitching about food stamps and pay all workers no less than 17.50 per hour .......... which might make some still eligible for assistance depending on residential location.
Some grocery stores do pay very good wages by the way ...... $20.00 per hour or more. This is real life.
BTW none of you has proved me wrong....... all that has been provided has proved none can provide hard evidence. Insults and intimidation does not equal hard evidence. TRump is a terrible business manager which is why he had to get bailed out by Russia and such. Banks in America quit financing his reckless lifestyle.
Russia and China has got the fake republican party by the throat. Not only that Rump and his few friends keep ripping off "constituents" by the millions of dollars in order to keep their phoney big spending lifestyles alive.
You're making the assertion that a huge increase in the minimum wage would be good for the economy, eliminate the need for food stamps and raise people out of poverty. The burden of proof is on YOU, not others. Provide a link to irrefutable proof those assertions are fact. Not some liberal Op-Ed, not some demonrat party talking point and not some fantasy world "study". A link to 100% irrefutable proof. If you can't prove your assertion, your nothing more than a whiny *** liberal spouting demonrat ****.razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ Stop bitching about food stamps and pay all workers no less than 17.50 per hour .......... which might make some still eligible for assistance depending on residential location.
Some grocery stores do pay very good wages by the way ...... $20.00 per hour or more. This is real life.
BTW none of you has proved me wrong....... all that has been provided has proved none can provide hard evidence. Insults and intimidation does not equal hard evidence. TRump is a terrible business manager which is why he had to get bailed out by Russia and such. Banks in America quit financing his reckless lifestyle.
Russia and China has got the fake republican party by the throat. Not only that Rump and his few friends keep ripping off "constituents" by the millions of dollars in order to keep their phoney big spending lifestyles alive.
I thought you doubled the hourly wage to get the annual salary? 17.50/hr equals 35,000razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ $17.50 per hour is $33,000 per year thus $35 per hour is $66,000 per year which would eliminate the need for food stamps for a ton of people.
What's wrong with that?
And $66,000 a year would push up economic growth which is a good thing.
What's wrong with that?
If CEO's would cut their salaries by 50% and eliminate golden parachutes the cost of goods would not increase
paying workers $66,000 a year.
It doesn't matter which person recites ideas that never work, it is the static idea that never worked throughout history someone is repeating another generation forward people choose to believe true.
razoo » 19 Jun 2023, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ $17.50 per hour is $33,000 per year thus $35 per hour is $66,000 per year which would eliminate the need for food stamps for a ton of people.
What's wrong with that?
And $66,000 a year would push up economic growth which is a good thing.
What's wrong with that?
If CEO's would cut their salaries by 50% and eliminate golden parachutes the cost of goods would not increase
paying workers $66,000 a year.
To get the annual salary, multiply the hourly rate by 2,080. I just multiply by 2,000 (basically what you said) to get a general ballpark. In casual conversation that is "good enough for government work:. Of course, the higher the hourly rate gets the more those 80 extra hours can make a difference on the true annual salary.BuckNaked » 19 Jun 2023, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ I thought you doubled the hourly wage to get the annual salary? 17.50/hr equals 35,000
and 35/hr equals 70,000
CEOs? lmao. 90% of US businesses have less than 100 employees.