show me one time I supported bidenZeets2 » 12 Jul 2023, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ OK, let's take you at your word that you're "on the side of the common man".
Tell us how you can support the policies of an idiot like Biden who has opened the floodgates at the border, bringing in MILLIONS of unskilled workers who will be competing with the AMERICAN "common man" for those minimum wage jobs?
Have you ever grasped or even heard of the laws of supply and demand?
Why should a business owner agree to pay more than the amount that they can pay for what someone is willing to work for?
Go ahead and try to get your $32 minimum wage passed, then watch the millions of American workers get fired as businesses choose to pay cash to illegals who will work for $5 an hour or less off the books?
And you think YOU'RE a friend to the "common man"?![]()
[img]blob:5644ed6c-dc19-44fb-9b6c-05b6506d46a4[/img]Mrkelly » 12 Jul 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ show me one time I supported biden
show me one time I suggested $32 minimum wage
im for a living wage
im sick and tired of companies like Walmart making “record profits “, while many of their employees are on food stamps to get by
[img]blob:bc55f5b2-01f1-4503-86aa-5a47911896e3[/img]
https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/LqVc1 ... d52e53.jpg
but **** um .. right?
murica
Zeets is right. You are too. But see- if a law was passed to force Walmart and Amazon to pay a nice wage. The small town bidness owners would be shoved out too.Mrkelly » 12 Jul 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ show me one time I supported biden
show me one time I suggested $32 minimum wage
im for a living wage
im sick and tired of companies like Walmart making “record profits “, while many of their employees are on food stamps to get by
[img]blob:bc55f5b2-01f1-4503-86aa-5a47911896e3[/img]
https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/LqVc1 ... d52e53.jpg
but **** um .. right?
murica
Am I mistaken in the belief that you voted for him? And Hillary? And Obama?Mrkelly » 12 Jul 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ show me one time I supported biden
show me one time I suggested $32 minimum wage
im for a living wage
im sick and tired of companies like Walmart making “record profits “, while many of their employees are on food stamps to get by
[img]blob:bc55f5b2-01f1-4503-86aa-5a47911896e3[/img]
https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/LqVc1 ... d52e53.jpg
but **** um .. right?
murica
Nostradamus'omh » 19 Jun 2023, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑ one sided expectations everything goes as planned, but evolving never exceeds only taking place here in this moment nothing living duplicates what arrived already working same way constantly.
You base everything on potential of nobody knows, but every brain navigates space adapting to time left forward here, now as a reproduction gets conceived to decomposed living outside the womb of origin and final destination of a tomb sharing space in plain sight.
Now you didn't include all level of taxation where taxes take that annual income to about half as you describe the gross income, not the net able to spend on one's family.
How do you divide the whole truth into such segments of anything else is possible but living never exceeds left evolving forward as displaced in plain sight now?
I call **** on your whole ideology and social identity.
walmart already shoved out the mom and popssootedupCyndi » 12 Jul 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Zeets is right. You are too. But see- if a law was passed to force Walmart and Amazon to pay a nice wage. The small town bidness owners would be shoved out too.
I knew the lady that owned our small town Subway. She shut her down- in the last minimum pay hike. She told me- she just couldn't swing it. We lost a Subway and the employees lost their jobs?
they changed their meat anyway and I didn't care.
The original ratified in Sept 1789 before the 2nd ratification in 1791 adding the 10 bill of rights?Zeets2 » 12 Jul 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ Apparently, you've never read the US Constitution, have you?
If you tried it, you wouldn't appear quite so ignorant here.
sootedupCyndi » 12 Jul 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Zeets is right. You are too. But see- if a law was passed to force Walmart and Amazon to pay a nice wage. The small town bidness owners would be shoved out too.
I knew the lady that owned our small town Subway. She shut her down- in the last minimum pay hike. She told me- she just couldn't swing it. We lost a Subway and the employees lost their jobs?
they changed their meat anyway and I didn't care.
Nostradamus'omh » 12 Jul 2023, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ The original ratified in Sept 1789 before the 2nd ratification in 1791 adding the 10 bill of rights?
“socialists ideals”Zeets2 » 12 Jul 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Am I mistaken in the belief that you voted for him? And Hillary? And Obama?
And what exactly is your definition of a "living wage"? You don't get to hide your socialist ideals by hiding it with a non-descript term that means nothing!
And if you're sick of companies like Wal-mart, then don't patronize them! But until the day you're made king, you DON'T get to tell others what they should do with THEIR MONEY!
Just keep your hands in your own pockets and mind your own business!
You should live on a commune where you could share the non-wealth that deadbeats like you generate.Mrkelly » 12 Jul 2023, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ “socialists ideals”![]()
“Non descript term” ?
how much more “descript” can it be ?
a wage good enough to live on
but I get it, big companies deserve every penny they can get … record profits for everyone
if a person can’t get by on $10 per hour, go get a second job
problem solved
I don’t know what I was thinking
I stand corrected
Nostradamus'omh » 13 Jul 2023, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑ Your mind was nurtured by context since the day you were born with a unique brain navigating time mutually occupying space in series parallel compounding events evolving forward in plain sight here and you reject anyone being honest about it as much as allying with everyone agreeing to believe Eternity is out there any other time than here now.
You are a denier of self to defend that intellectual career of a mercenary defending what people choose to believe is greater than evolving naturally here now.Taipan » 13 Jul 2023, 5:27 am » wrote: ↑ I am a mercenary.
Who are you ? :)
https://youtu.be/9GgxinPwAGc
As all socialists like you should and MUST be corrected, fool!Mrkelly » 12 Jul 2023, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ “socialists ideals”![]()
“Non descript term” ?
how much more “descript” can it be ?
a wage good enough to live on
but I get it, big companies deserve every penny they can get … record profits for everyone
if a person can’t get by on $10 per hour, go get a second job
problem solved
I don’t know what I was thinking
I stand corrected
You're rightZeets2 » 13 Jul 2023, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ As all socialists like you should and MUST be corrected, fool!
So tell me what YOU'RE idea of a "living wage" is? Or do you really think that's the same amount for everyone?
Isn't a "living wage" higher for a married man with 4 kids than a single man?
Isn't it higher for someone living in NY, NJ, CA, or IL than it is for someone living in Arkansas?
You think it's the same for a teenager getting his first job at McDonalds as an adult with two mortgages, a 12 year-old car, and a kid who needs braces?
You liberal idiots lock onto a leftist talking point that you think means anything and you don't care how dumb it makes you sound when you repeat it!
And yes, companies big or small deserve every penny they can get as long as they're operating within the confines of the laws of their state and federal government.
It IS NOT the obligation of a business to give an employee any more than the amount they agreed he'd work for or to provide jobs for any number of people.
Their obligation is to maximize the investment of their stockholders in a corporation, or to provide security and an income for the business owner and his family in a smaller company.
And here's the kicker that you socialist idiots can never get through your thick heads:
THE US CAPITALIST SYSTEM HAS RESULTED IN CREATING THE STRONGEST, WEALTHIEST COUNTRY IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD, yet you hate it!
And you Democrat fools can never accept or acknowledge that reality!
Wages will never be based on lifestyle choices------ something the Left cannot grasp.Zeets2 » 13 Jul 2023, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ As all socialists like you should and MUST be corrected, fool!
So tell me what YOU'RE idea of a "living wage" is? Or do you really think that's the same amount for everyone?
Isn't a "living wage" higher for a married man with 4 kids than a single man?
Isn't it higher for someone living in NY, NJ, CA, or IL than it is for someone living in Arkansas?
You think it's the same for a teenager getting his first job at McDonalds as an adult with two mortgages, a 12 year-old car, and a kid who needs braces?
You liberal idiots lock onto a leftist talking point that you think means anything and you don't care how dumb it makes you sound when you repeat it!
And yes, companies big or small deserve every penny they can get as long as they're operating within the confines of the laws of their state and federal government.
It IS NOT the obligation of a business to give an employee any more than the amount they agreed he'd work for or to provide jobs for any number of people.
Their obligation is to maximize the investment of their stockholders in a corporation, or to provide security and an income for the business owner and his family in a smaller company.
And here's the kicker that you socialist idiots can never get through your thick heads:
THE US CAPITALIST SYSTEM HAS RESULTED IN CREATING THE STRONGEST, WEALTHIEST COUNTRY IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD, yet you hate it!
And you Democrat fools can never accept or acknowledge that reality!