More than that, I think that "in harm's way" is *** talk, you ******.maineman » 26 Jun 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ you think that military personnel who serve in harm's way are takers?
No, dick sucker, I made a play on words that you were incompetent to take as intended. You thought that I GENUINELY believed a tampion was a tampon - because you, yourself, would be that stupid.maineman » 26 Jun 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ you mocked me for "misspelling" tampion and when I crammed it right back up your ***, you ran away like the frightened little ****** that you are.
You might indeed, if you were me. Unlike you, groomer, I have that capacity.
Inviting a member to another forum and posting a link to that forum is not rude?nuckinfutz » 26 Jun 2023, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't been rude! You just like to **** with me is what it is!
Show some integrity man! C'mon!
Texas is also on our list, but not so much for the food.Taipan » 26 Jun 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Texas eat-joints...........can easily show-down little Maine.
So can Mexico eat-joints........easily.
You punk..........try to grow a set of nuts, sailor. LOL.......![]()
The Mexican Torta.........![]()
Context makes people believe in ideas forward. Genetics shows where each individual arrived from. Time is an orientation of when one existed as ancestrally lived or living. Tomorrow is a concept of timing things intellectually with rotation of the planet, orbit of the moon, changing seasons each elliptical lap around the star where each reproduction lives its complete cycle of conceived to decomposed once.maineman » 26 Jun 2023, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ we're talking about the definition of a word, you lazy drug-addled ****.
If you don't trust Google, how about Merriam-Webster?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tampion
now get out of my face. You insult my intelligence, and your laziness is sickening.
I could but why? You don't want certain members here, just admit it and let's move on, K?Cannonpointer » 26 Jun 2023, 10:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Inviting a member to another forum and posting a link to that forum is not rude?
Could you post a link to THIS forum over there, fruitcake?
my ability to pin anything is disabled. I get my NHB threads moved to water cooler. That comes with posting on a free message board where others rule the flow of information as they see fit.nuckin futz » 27 Jun 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ I could but why? You don't want certain members here, just admit it and let's move on, K?
And you disabled my P.M.!
Nothing like a lefty to dance on the grave to push banning guns.maineman » 23 Jun 2023, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/22/us/norwa ... index.html
two-year-olds with guns kill people... like his mom and unborn brother.
#2A
#MAGA
The shooter's brother was delivered by cesarean section in the hospital. He died on the table, followed shortly thereafter by his mother.RayJJohnson » 27 Jun 2023, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ Nothing like a lefty to dance on the grave to push banning guns.
Is his brother an unborn brother or just a fetus?
Psychotic Liberal Assholes kill peoplemaineman » 23 Jun 2023, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/22/us/norwa ... index.html
two-year-olds with guns kill people... like his mom and unborn brother.
#2A
#MAGA
And you are using it to push banning guns. You ARE dancing on their graves. This is the EXACT meaning of that phrase.maineman » 27 Jun 2023, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ The shooter's brother was delivered by cesarean section in the hospital. He died on the table, followed shortly thereafter by his mother.
I am not dancing on any grave, but, through the sadness I feel because of this event, I can take some small solace in knowing that the gene pool got just a tiny bit deeper as a result.
If I were pushing banning guns, you might have a point.RayJJohnson » 27 Jun 2023, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ And you are using it to push banning guns. You ARE dancing on their graves. This is the EXACT meaning of that phrase.
I would not know how to do that, tard.nuckinfutz » 27 Jun 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ I could but why? You don't want certain members here, just admit it and let's move on, K?
And you disabled my P.M.!
maineman » 27 Jun 2023, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ If I were pushing banning guns, you might have a point.
I OWN guns. I have never pushed to ban guns.
Next.
Maineman is a passive aggressive weasel.
Mainstain is very proficient at talking out of both sides of his ***.Cannonpointer » 27 Jun 2023, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Maineman is a passive aggressive weasel.
His OP clearly implicates maga and 2a supporters. He insists it doesn't - but cannot explain why he tagged them.
His thread title clearly implies its opposite - that GUNS are the evil, that GUNS kill people. Then he wheedles that he owns some guns, so his words don't matter.
He's a panty wearing little fruitcake who thinks sexually grooming children is okay. Expecting his **** to hold together is a big stretch.
He's desperate to be admired for his Frank Burns level taker "service."RedheadedStranger » 27 Jun 2023, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Mainstain is very proficient at talking out of both sides of his ***.
Must be a Navy thing.
You misspelled nigras.
I think common sense gun control measures, such as waiting periods, age requirements, red-flag laws, gun show loophole elimination, and universal background checks make sense but I would NEVER support banning guns.
STFU YOU CHINK SPYmaineman » 27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I think common sense gun control measures, such as waiting periods, age requirements, red-flag laws, gun show loophole elimination, and universal background checks make sense but I would NEVER support banning guns.
That little kid didn't kill his mom and baby brother because of a push to control guns, he did so because his criminally stupid father left a loaded handgun in the drawer of his nightstand and not under lock and key. I hope the father goes to prison for a long long time.