she was elected to be Vice President by the will of the people.Neo » 02 Jul 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Election by will of the people. She ran and was soundly rejected as unqualified for office. She could assume office should Biden be Incapable of service, she stands no chance at being elected.
HE IS WEAK AND CAN'T SUSTAIN A GOOD BITCHSLAPPING.
YOU GET PISSED ON BY ME ALL THE TIME.maineman » 02 Jul 2023, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ different strokes for different folks
I usually try to not get into pissing contests with skunks.
he’s alright. We have an understandingrighteous » 02 Jul 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ HE IS WEAK AND CAN'T SUSTAIN A GOOD BITCHSLAPPING.
RUNS AWAY AND THEN PUTS YOU ON IGNORE
IDIOTmaineman » 02 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ she was elected to be Vice President by the will of the people.
Did you ever take a civics course? She could not have been NOMINATED if she did not possess all the qualifications necessary to assume the office.
Do you think that John Tyler was super popular in the north when he stepped up after Harrison croaked?
How about Andrew Johnson?
Chester Arthur?
Teddy Roosevelt certainly was popular on his own, but
Calvin Coolidge?
Harry Truman?
come on.
Just cuz you don't happy to like Kamala doesn't give you the right to rewrite the **** constitution!
ALRIGHT?
we keep it pretty civil. I don’t bust his balls to much. He leaves me alone.righteous » 02 Jul 2023, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑ ALRIGHT?
FOR WHAT? HE PLAYS YOU WELL
I HAVE NO SYMPATHY FOR UNLETTERED LEFTISTS.
YES. WHEN HE SENSES SURRENDER, HE LEAVES YOU ALONE.Imgreatagain » 02 Jul 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ we keep it pretty civil. I don’t bust his balls to much. He leaves me alone.
why all caps? Annoyingrighteous » 02 Jul 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ YES. WHEN HE SENSES SURRENDER, HE LEAVES YOU ALONE.
SOME LIKE ME, FIND HIM VERY EASY TO READ AND CAN PREVENT HIM FROM SPINNING THE TOPIC.
WHY NOT?
I never questioned her qualifications, I questioned her electability.maineman » 02 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ she was elected to be Vice President by the will of the people.
Did you ever take a civics course? She could not have been NOMINATED if she did not possess all the qualifications necessary to assume the office.
Do you think that John Tyler was super popular in the north when he stepped up after Harrison croaked?
How about Andrew Johnson?
Chester Arthur?
Teddy Roosevelt certainly was popular on his own, but
Calvin Coolidge?
Harry Truman?
come on.
Just cuz you don't happy to like Kamala doesn't give you the right to rewrite the **** constitution!
Neo » 02 Jul 2023, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ Or too qualified. Kamala finished dead last in the democrat primary. She isn't qualified for the office.
You are right... you and I do have an understanding and we have been able to, for the most part, transcend our prior enmity. Your pal there is a different story. He kinda reminds me of the gymnast in the empty gymnasium... he ALWAYS sticks the landing for a perfect 10!
maineman » 02 Jul 2023, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ What qualification for the presidency, as listed in our constitution, is she lacking?
She is a citizen over 35 years of age. She is legally eligible, she is not qualified.
you claimed you did not say anything about her qualification.Neo » 02 Jul 2023, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ She is a citizen over 35 years of age. She is legally eligible, she is not qualified.
There is a difference between eligible and qualified. Cameltoe is eligible, she is completely unqualified.maineman » 02 Jul 2023, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑ you claimed you did not say anything about her qualification.
I shoved that LIE right back up your well-traveled *** and you STILL don't have the balls to admit you DID indeed say something EXACTLY about her qualifications.
I am done with you. Run away. Loser.