Trump supporters don't usually want dildos and strap-ons anyway.maineman » 02 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ A sign just cropped up on a store in Portland, Maine... and I guess it has been replicated in a lot of other places around the country... I am not sure where it started, but it says, "Since the Supreme Court has ruled that businesses can discriminate... NO SALES TO TRUMP SUPPORTERS!
Portland is a pretty BLUE town, and, my daughter reports that business today is BOOMING there at that shop!
that clearly demonstrates the idiocy of a very high percentage of voters.Bruce » 02 Jul 2023, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you figure out why she could beat this Democrat?
The man was highly qualified, an effective representative, and had held office for years.
What, was his name?
Oh... I see what you did there. That was a really ham-fisted, formulaic attempt at an insult.sunburn » 02 Jul 2023, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump supporters don't usually want dildos and strap-ons anyway.
well, thank you. I didn't figure a moron such as yourself would've caught that!maineman » 02 Jul 2023, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh... I see what you did there. That was a really ham-fisted, formulaic attempt at an insult.
Aren't YOU **** clever!
I'll match CV's with you anyway.sunburn » 02 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ well, thank you. I didn't figure a moron such as yourself would've caught that!
your privilege!
**** you stupid bitch...razoo » 02 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ IMO too many issues go through the supreme court that should remain in the halls of congress to fix until it
is fixed.
Frankly I still say the Supreme Court should be abolished. Let voters have the last word.......... that's our job.
Shut your FOUL TRAP! ****!
i guess **** pussies think alike, eh?
^^^ now that's what I call a buried hatchet!
Punch » 02 Jul 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑
She's pretty hot. I'm inclined to agree with her.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls for Congress to limit the power of the Supreme Court (msn.com)
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) stated that Congress should use a variety of methods to limit the power of the Supreme Court.In an appearance on CNN on Sunday, the New York Democrat argued that the Supreme Court was compromising its own legitimacy and that she believes Congress must act to limit its power.
"I truly do," Ocasio-Cortez answered when asked if she believes the power of the Supreme Court justices should be limited. "And this is not a new — this is not a new development in history. This is part of our system of checks and balances. The courts, if they were to proceed without any check on their power, without any balance on their power, it would be a dangerous, authoritarian expansion of power in the Supreme Court."
The New York Democrat then said that Congress should use every tool at its disposal against the Supreme Court, including investigations, subpoenas, and impeachments."We have a broad level of tools to deal with misconduct, overreach, and abuse of power, and the Supreme Court has not been receiving the adequate oversight necessary in order to preserve their own legitimacy," Ocasio-Cortez said. "And in the process, they themselves have been destroying the legitimacy of the court, which is profoundly dangerous for our entire democracy. We will bury them."
Want another totally factual statement? Not a **** one will pass a republican controlled House.maineman » 02 Jul 2023, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ "We have a broad level of tools to deal with misconduct, overreach, and abuse of power, and the Supreme Court has not been receiving the adequate oversight necessary in order to preserve their own legitimacy,"
That is a totally factual statement. Congress has a lot of constitutional tools at its disposal to shine a harsh light on SCOTUS. If they can't stand the heat...
Better get busy on that Constitutional Amendment.razoo » 02 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ IMO too many issues go through the supreme court that should remain in the halls of congress to fix until it
is fixed.
Frankly I still say the Supreme Court should be abolished. Let voters have the last word.......... that's our job.
you silly MAGAts are always looking short term. What do you think will happen if we take the house back in 2024?ConsRule » 02 Jul 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Want another totally factual statement? Not a **** one will pass a republican controlled House.
SUCKS TO BE YOU!!!!!
Don't know, don't care, I just want to get in her pantsuit.GeorgeWashington » 02 Jul 2023, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Which method of limiting SCOTUS power do you agree with?
I'd bring it to her.
Bug-eyed assholes don't do much for me.Punch » 02 Jul 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑
She's pretty hot. I'm inclined to agree with her.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls for Congress to limit the power of the Supreme Court (msn.com)
Z09 » 02 Jul 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ She's a dope....
Remember her comment that the world is coming to an end in 2030?
I can only think with one head at a time.DeezerShoove » 02 Jul 2023, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Bug-eyed assholes don't do much for me.
Besides, what the **** does she know about the Supreme Court?
They weren't troublesome when a majority libs... Now a problem?
She's a **** partisan hack. You think with your dick.