ConsRule » 05 Jul 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Why not simply admit you were making **** up when you said liberal broadcasters get fired for lying. If not, we're still waiting on a link to ANYONE fired for lying during a broadcast in the last four years.
Brilliant treatment.
Link us to that, fruitcake.Bruce » 05 Jul 2023, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ MSNBC viewers sympathized with the kid. He was wrongfully smeared as a racist, The stories were retracted and corrected.
Maybe you're having trouble with reading comprehension...there are courses you can take.Bruce » 05 Jul 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/ ... index.html
https://nypost.com/2022/11/15/nbc-news- ... story/amp/
Ever since Dan Rather, most of the others got wise
https://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainm ... story.html
Don’t make **** up, and don’t publish lies, and if you make an error correct it.
Using the CNN shakeup as a pretense of accountability is a sleazy move EVEN FOR YOU, mouth ****.Bruce » 05 Jul 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/ ... index.html
https://nypost.com/2022/11/15/nbc-news- ... story/amp/
Ever since Dan Rather, most of the others got wise
https://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainm ... story.html
Don’t make **** up, and don’t publish lies, and if you make an error correct it.
The second link was also about someone who went AGAINST the narrative and told the truth.ConsRule » 05 Jul 2023, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe you're having trouble with reading comprehension...there are courses you can take.
The first link was about people who resigned for going with a "single anonymous source" in violation of the company standard/policy. They were NOT fired and did not leave because the lied.
The second link was about someone suspended...not fired.
Keep trying. Maybe ask your mommy to explain it to you before you waste any more time.
Cannonpointer » 05 Jul 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Brilliant treatment.
I actually do that fairly often on this board, to homosexuals and groomers.
I haven't heard one of those make a correction on Trump Russia collusion, pee tapes, or anything related to Russia, Russia, Russia!Bruce » 05 Jul 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ They get fired or suspended quite often, and for small lies.
If they make mistakes they make corrections.
By the way, the exact same snake oil fraudulent advertisers use the same ads on MSNBC as Fox.
The difference is the audience.
Fox viewers demand to learn Hunter Biden has sniffed cocaine in the White House and left his stash there. So they’ll get that lie.
MSNBC viewers delight in laughing at conservatives who parrot **** liberals know are lies.
https://youtu.be/Y4Zdx97A63s
The “pee” tape sounds like a rumor. It reads like a fairy tale. It might be possible, but it’s not confirmed.sunburn » 05 Jul 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't heard one of those make a correction on Trump Russia collusion, pee tapes, or anything related to Russia, Russia, Russia!
So, who left it there? I'm absolutely sure there are cameras non stop in the "common area".
they're buying time so they can doctor some tapes and trap some poor ole smuck.
so, even if Putin was trying to help Trump. there was no collusion.Bruce » 05 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ The “pee” tape sounds like a rumor. It reads like a fairy tale. It might be possible, but it’s not confirmed.
But the overall information that Putin was trying to aid Trump and oppose Hillary is not just sound, it will be taught in textbooks for generations. Because it was true.
My Republican friends will ask me, why would Putin support Trump?
And there isn’t any polite way to explain it’s because Republicans are so far gone down the rabbit hole of right wing lies and fabrications, they no longer can tell a truth they disagree with, from a lie they want to believe.