DE-DOLLARIZING: Even liberal THE INTERCEPT agrees and warns of whats coming

User avatar
By Sumela
5 Jul 2023 11:41 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4
User avatar
Sumela
5 Jul 2023 3:34 pm
User avatar
      
21,724 posts
sootedupCyndi » 05 Jul 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: I gave a very basic point!  the latest thing i heard- was in NJ- A big billion dollar bailout for off seas windfarms!  Pay-oo-la-TO Denmark! Paid for by the NJ tax payers!
The biden admin comes after the lobstermen in my state- for hurting whales!
like right- the off shore wind farms may be doing it!
must be a friend of Biden- because this doesn't Jive!
Both parties are guilty of actions

that are causing the world to begin

de-dollarization.
 
User avatar
sooted up Cyndi
5 Jul 2023 3:43 pm
User avatar
Water Cooler Poleece
Water Cooler Poleece
10,440 posts
Sumela » 05 Jul 2023, 3:34 pm » wrote: Both parties are guilty of actions

that are causing the world to begin

de-dollarization.
LOL- no kidding! thanks for telling me that. :blush: :wave:   
Image
User avatar
Sumela
5 Jul 2023 8:41 pm
User avatar
      
21,724 posts
sootedupCyndi » 05 Jul 2023, 3:43 pm » wrote: LOL- no kidding! thanks for telling me that. Image Image
I never said you didnt know stuff.... :P  
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
5 Jul 2023 10:51 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,733 posts
Bruce » 05 Jul 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: On the radical far right and radical far left, both hate our own government, love Russia, and promote nutty conspiracy theories.
 
Do you have ANY proof of this **** ^ whatsoever?

Name the far right and far left groups that love russia, or you just profferred a nutty conspiracy theory embraced by you alone. 
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
5 Jul 2023 10:52 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,733 posts
Skans » 05 Jul 2023, 1:20 pm » wrote: No one wants to own Chink stocks.  They don't adhere to GAAP.  Why?  Because, Chinks are liars, cheats and thieves. Yeah, that's a big deal.  So, until then, US companies and US investors that own US companies have nothing to worry about.
Except the fact that they do business with and in chyna.
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
5 Jul 2023 10:54 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,733 posts
Skans » 05 Jul 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: Except, GAAP is real, verifiable, quantifiable and allows us to know with great detail what we are investing in.  
How did those principles - strictly adhered to un the USA - perform in 2007 and 2008?
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
5 Jul 2023 10:56 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,733 posts
Sumela » 05 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm » wrote: One day Skans is a globalist....the next....anti-globalist.

Sorry, but he is a confused lil fella Imagemg:
CONfused, CONflicted and CONtrary. 

He's also an Imp. 

IMPervious to fact, IMPervious to logic, and IMPossibly infatuated with fake texas cowgirls like tai1on. 
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
5 Jul 2023 10:58 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,733 posts
Skans » 05 Jul 2023, 1:56 pm » wrote: I am an individualist.  I value countries that champion and praise individualism. Collectivism is tyranny and manipulation by elitists.
Like when you got in line and took the pfizer jab.

Four times.

Because GAAP.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Sumela
5 Jul 2023 11:02 pm
User avatar
      
21,724 posts
Cannonpointer » 05 Jul 2023, 10:56 pm » wrote: CONfused, CONflicted and CONtrary. 

He's also an Imp. 

IMPervious to fact, IMPervious to logic, and IMPossibly infatuated with fake texas cowgirls like tai1on.
He is almost an enoch like Bruce
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
5 Jul 2023 11:05 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,733 posts
Sumela » 05 Jul 2023, 11:02 pm » wrote: He is almost an enoch like Bruce
Enoch was a bible bad *** - methusela's daddy.

You're thinking eunoch - like michael jackson. 

Yep - he's not much more than a one-glover. 
 
A VACCINATED one-glover - or, eunoch. 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Skans
6 Jul 2023 6:59 am
User avatar
      
14,318 posts
Cannonpointer » 05 Jul 2023, 10:54 pm » wrote: How did those principles - strictly adhered to un the USA - perform in 2007 and 2008?
2007-2008 Depression was caused by one thing:  Congress passing loose lending laws that allowed banks to make loans without verifying a person's creditworthiness. This, coupled with ambitious developers, corrupt appraisers and get-rich-quick blue-collar house investors tanked the economy.  In other words - all because of a Democrat program (FDR New Deal style) to get blacks out of the projects and into houses they could never afford.
 
 
User avatar
Mrkelly
6 Jul 2023 7:09 am
User avatar
      
9,343 posts
Skans » 06 Jul 2023, 6:59 am » wrote: 2007-2008 Depression was caused by one thing:  Congress passing loose lending laws that allowed banks to make loans without verifying a person's creditworthiness. This, coupled with ambitious developers, corrupt appraisers and get-rich-quick blue-collar house investors tanked the economy.  In other words - all because of a Democrat program (FDR New Deal style) to get blacks out of the projects and into houses they could never afford.
if that were true, Obama wouldn't have bailed the banks out

then let the banks keep 5 million homes

how did that help the black folks again?
Image
User avatar
Skans
6 Jul 2023 7:15 am
User avatar
      
14,318 posts
Mrkelly » 06 Jul 2023, 7:09 am » wrote: if that were true, Obama wouldn't have bailed the banks out

then let the banks keep 5 million homes

how did that help the black folks again?
Can you tell me how many houses Countrywide Financial got to keep?  Or, IndyMac.  There were about 140 smaller banks that primarily made loans to low income home buyers as a result of this bad policy.  But, Countrywide was the biggest and the one most involved in making subsidized, low-income loans and then dumping them on the secondary market. 
 
User avatar
Mrkelly
6 Jul 2023 7:23 am
User avatar
      
9,343 posts
Skans » 06 Jul 2023, 7:15 am » wrote: Can you tell me how many houses Countrywide Financial got to keep?  Or, IndyMac.  There were about 140 smaller banks that primarily made loans to low income home buyers as a result of this bad policy.  But, Countrywide was the biggest and the one most involved in making subsidized, low-income loans and then dumping them on the secondary market.

then the people that couldn’t afford them, lost them

and Obama let the banks take them

as a reward for **** up the economy 
Image
User avatar
Skans
6 Jul 2023 7:55 am
User avatar
      
14,318 posts
Mrkelly » 06 Jul 2023, 7:23 am » wrote: then the people that couldn’t afford them, lost them


 
It doesn't pay to be stupid, does it.
and Obama let the banks take them
Obama didn't "let" anything.  People who had no business buying a house couldn't make their payments.  The banks had liens against the houses.  Why?  Because the Banks (not Black people) paid for those houses.  If the house-buyer doesn't pay the bank, the bank gets to take the house.  It's been that way for hundreds of years.
as a reward for **** up the economy
A Democrat Congress, hell-bent on getting black people into white neighborhoods F-ed up the economy.  Not Banks. 
 
User avatar
Mrkelly
6 Jul 2023 8:02 am
User avatar
      
9,343 posts
Skans » 06 Jul 2023, 7:55 am » wrote: It doesn't pay to be stupid, does it.

Obama didn't "let" anything.  People who had no business buying a house couldn't make their payments.  The banks had liens against the houses.  Why?  Because the Banks (not Black people) paid for those houses.  If the house-buyer doesn't pay the bank, the bank gets to take the house.  It's been that way for hundreds of years.

A Democrat Congress, hell-bent on getting black people into white neighborhoods F-ed up the economy.  Not Banks.
they wanted them to have the houses so bad?

why did they bail out the banks, and give them the houses?

If they wanted black folks to have houses, why didn't they bailout the people that were sold a bunch of lies instead?
Image
User avatar
Bob
6 Jul 2023 8:10 am
Bob
User avatar
   
1,319 posts
Sumela » 05 Jul 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: Wow, what an honest headline.  Sums it up perfectly. 
Poor BIDEN REGIME...just another Neocon **** pile.


 MONETARY BLOWBACK: HOW U.S. WARS, SANCTIONS, AND HEGEMONY ARE THREATENING THE DOLLAR’S RESERVE CURRENCY DOMINANCE

How U.S. Wars, Sanctions, and Hegemony Are Threatening the Dollar’s Reserve Currency Dominance (theintercept.com)

  Your little country is going to eat toxic high pesticide-herbicide GMO food that will now be grown in DU polluted soil and wash it down with fluoridated water and your country is going to use dollars to buy experimental medical treatments trying to solve its health problems. We give you dollars or the even more worthless  bleps on a computer screen that we don't really want, you give us any real stuff that you may still own. Just sign the contract, donate any remaining property that you may still own and then never have to worry about negotiating another contract for your civilian population again.
User avatar
Skans
6 Jul 2023 8:59 am
User avatar
      
14,318 posts
Mrkelly » 06 Jul 2023, 8:02 am » wrote: they wanted them to have the houses so bad?

 
A Democrat Congress wanted Blacks to be able to afford houses.  So, they jerry-rigged programs to get them to qualify for high-LTV loans; risky loans, which banks had no business making and Blacks had no business committing to. White investors got in on the action too - and they not only lost the homes, but went bankrupt.
 
User avatar
Mrkelly
6 Jul 2023 9:03 am
User avatar
      
9,343 posts
Skans » 06 Jul 2023, 8:59 am » wrote: A Democrat Congress wanted Blacks to be able to afford houses.  So, they jerry-rigged programs to get them to qualify for high-LTV loans; risky loans, which banks had no business making and Blacks had no business committing to. White investors got in on the action too - and they not only lost the homes, but went bankrupt.
so why didn't congress bail them out instead of the banks?

your theory is weak as water
Image
User avatar
Sumela
6 Jul 2023 9:05 am
User avatar
      
21,724 posts
Bob » 06 Jul 2023, 8:10 am » wrote:   Your little country is going to eat toxic high pesticide-herbicide GMO food that will now be grown in DU polluted soil and wash it down with fluoridated water and your country is going to use dollars to buy experimental medical treatments trying to solve its health problems. We give you dollars or the even more worthless  bleps on a computer screen that we don't really want, you give us any real stuff that you may still own. Just sign the contract, donate any remaining property that you may still own and then never have to worry about negotiating another contract for your civilian population again.
You appear to be lost, sir..... :omg:  
 
1 2 3 4

Who is online

In total there are 2062 users online :: 10 registered, 15 bots, and 2037 guests
Bots: LCC, Not, Scrapy, Yahoo! Slurp, app.hypefactors.com, proximic, semantic-visions.com, YandexBot, ADmantX, linkfluence.com, Mediapartners-Google, BLEXBot, bingbot, curl/7, Googlebot
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum