What do you mean it can't take Kiev?. ....Bruce » 11 Jul 2023, 10:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is Putin’s problem today.
He rules a thug ocracy. The Soviets sold all major industries thirty years ago to oligarchs. It’s a stagnant, corrupt, Russian version of crony capitalism.
But Russia still had what the world thought was a formidable conventional army, one that could slice through to the Rhine in days, a week at most.
His army can’t take Kyiv. The Ukrainians just mauled it.
Can you imagine 50,000 dead and 150,000 severely wounded soldiers, 4,000 lost armored vehicles, and then a rebel brigade gets within a hundred miles of Moscow?
The West no longer fears invasion.
NATO would just devastate the attackers.
And Russia has nothing we don’t have already, but better.
If Putin used nukes in Ukraine the USA would use tactical nukes on equivalent Russian targets.Majik » 13 Jul 2023, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ What do you mean it can't take Kiev?. ....
are you really that **** stupid....
If Putin wanted to take Kiev ...he could do it in one night by flattening it all and turning it into rubble....all of it....
and in one week Putin could flatten every city in the Ukraine as well....
and that is a Military fact that even NATO is well aware of .....regardless of western propaganda.
And NATO also knows that if they attack Russia ......every major city in Europe would be struck with low yield tactical nukes .....
causing massive damage and civil unrest.
but even before Putin would strike European cities .....
Russia's allies like China and other Countries whom now see NATO and it's military ambitions as a growing threat would also come to Russia'a aid .
and whether you like it or not ....The list is long.
So, if NATO wants a world war where everybody loses .....it just may get it ....
especially if Lunatics like you whom start diplomacy threads glorifying Biden and NATO can't comprehend that that the Lunatics you are glorifying turned their backs on Peace and Diplomacy a year ago.....in favor of building a new military bloc that now threatens the rest of the world because of it's world dominating ambitions ....
The USA is willing to fund death down to the last Ukrainian.Bruce » 13 Jul 2023, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ If Putin used nukes in Ukraine the USA would use tactical nukes on equivalent Russian targets.
This is Putin’s Afghanistan or Vietnam.
Except the Ukrainians, like the Israelis, are fighting sons of bitches.
More Dave Dudley
https://youtu.be/9fIWGjxoklc
We’ll give Zelenskyy a ticker tape parade down Madison Avenue when this ends.
So long as they’ll fight.neueregel » 13 Jul 2023, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ The USA is willing to fund death down to the last Ukrainian.
Jantje_Smit » 13 Jul 2023, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ Does that mean you will stop cheering for trannies now?
https://youtu.be/X66kAgMjulc
Cheering for trannies doesn't make you tough, it makes you a dumb ***....
And guess how that makes you look...Back off........... Squatch-Dog !!
@Squatchman
Orders on the line !!
Back-off !!
Leave him alone.
I got him.
LOL...........Jantje_Smit » 14 Jul 2023, 2:20 am » wrote: ↑ Cheering for trannies doesn't make you tough, it makes you a dumb ***....
And guess how that makes you look...
Yeah, I know, you don't get it... let's just say it doesn't exactly help your case.. not that you have a case, you are a case, a hopeless one...
I thought about asking but I really don't wan't to know what your left arm is doing with the other ***...Taipan » 14 Jul 2023, 4:06 am » wrote: ↑
LOL...........@Squatchman
Back-off !!
Orders on the line !!
I said .......back-off !!
I will whoop this **** ...............until my left arm is tired. !!
LOL........Jantje_Smit » 14 Jul 2023, 4:13 am » wrote: ↑ I thought about asking but I really don't wan't to know what your left arm is doing with the other ***...
Damn, don't you feel even a little bit embarrassed?
![]()
See @Nostradamus' omh, that's what I mean, I deserve some sympathy too...
You were a *** 20 years ago too.. lol..Only a queer could bring up a picture like that...........from 20yr. ago.
LOL...............
And your boring neverending you tube spam is another thing, no one watches that, not even other ***... it's just... irksome..Here,
Dear-heart,...........
please let me help you.............
Jantje_Smit » 14 Jul 2023, 4:47 am » wrote: ↑ See @Nostradamus' omh, that's what I mean, I deserve some sympathy too...
You were a *** 20 years ago too.. lol..
And your boring neverending you tube spam is another thing, no one watches that, not even other ***... it's just... irksome..
Jantje_Smit » 14 Jul 2023, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not trying...
You're right about that, it is annoying when the results just won't register.. but don't worry, I have plenty of experience with that, you're just an amateur when it comes to being irksome..
![]()
To repeat myself.. somehow I doubt that...
You should stay off the Bud Light, not that it would make much of a difference I guess...(I am drinking beer).......
That's fake news, you are totally clueless about what happened, the general didn't fail, he had a solid plan and **** Bull wouldn't have stood a chance if the general wasn't betrayed..Mr. Custer,
You have guts.
OK. Fine.
You can ride a good horse..........fine........and cover 40mi./day.
But,
only a goddamn foolish, ******* would divide
his 1,000-man battalion into 3 groups.
Are you..........."Totally **** NUTS ?????
Goddamn.........those men did not need to die.
The scream sets in.
Failure of leadership.
Even @maineman is not that stupid !!
Ohhhhhhhhh.........is that why you were last in your class at West Point ??
(you dumb-***).
You short me on giving me something to work with, it's about time you adressed that problem... but then again, if you could, you wouldn't be irksome..But no..........I won't short you on guts.
You won that point.