Liberal Forum

Skans » 27 Jul 2023, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2023, 8:25 am

Do you understand this.......

Slavery was a deeply that remained legal in the United States rooted institution in North America until 1865. Abolition movement,it took the a civil war of the 13th amendment to end slavery and the ratification .

Though people with discrimination today, it did not still struggling end racism and descendants of these. Teach more uses, for these significant resources to about figures in the abolition movement. 

Slavery sustained agriculturally the how and now economy was the civil causes of the war, and in the United States for centuries this species self evidently evolves forward in plain sight.
 

If you think the civil war was about slavery, you are just a little...no, a lot wrong. It was about money.

Imgreatagain » 15 Jul 2023, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2023, 12:33 pm

.
 But not a lot of questioning of what is a man? 

 

. 

DeplorablePatriot » 27 Jul 2023, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2023, 11:48 am

This is where one in the hand is not as good a one in the bush.

what if it’s bald?

DeplorablePatriot » 27 Jul 2023, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2023, 7:32 pm

I didn't use it. It used me. It still does. The dastardly thing!
 

describe "IT" as too how it effects everything universally present in series parallel time displaced currently being everything going forward now. I do it all the time and everyone calls it gibberish from their one track mentality believing eternity is beyond the moment here.


Original sin or original idea how to cheat life from within one's own species preying on civil nature of honest soles promising what corrupted souls believe possible.


The haves and have nots. I have the understanding about how compounding chromosomes actually evolve now, you are demanding others to follow your collective we believe life exceeds the moment here and will eliminate anyone not joining your ideology by any means imaginable including physical elimination.

History has displayed all imaginable ways ruling elites play mind over matter, context means more than instinctive awareness to proportionately alive, symbolism over substance, Do as we say or all hell comes knocking on your door protesting one's non compliance to honoring those never accepting now isn't eternity and eliminating anyone that can explain it always has been.

102 generations ago. Humanity hasn't conquered anything but their own species sustaining self fulfilling prophecies manifested socially since dawn of civilization.

that conflicting time between intellectual creationism and extraterrestrial implanted evolving. All things requiring reasonable doubt academically, artistically, economically, politically, spiritually, socially, ancestrally practiced each generation gap of the 5 stages of ancestry present never duplicated a reproduction twice in the whole food chain native to this atmosphere sustained between erosion and decomposition.

Eternal separation as individually spontaneously delivered when conceived mutually evolving one of a kind womb to tomb/cradle to grave training each great great grandchild to follow the patterns of behavior by their previous 4 generation gaps sustaining history being made now.

The whole process anyway you want to pretend, I can defend my time evolving in plain sight kinetically eternally separated in my own skin equal to any other life form universally present.One male reproduction spontaneously alive mutually evolving, in series parallel time occupying space as I have since conceived.

Is that the "IT" that has you. Anyone can get everyone to believe in hypothetical scenarios, but there is always someone instinctively aware of everyone's social behavior working against one another from within their own ancestry and species. I had a sibling that would do anything to feel larger than life.

Her actions destroyed the reality I grew up in. I never blamed her, I just never followed what she believed possible. I didn't follow my ancestry either and it turns out I became the white sheep of my family tree.

Nostradamus'omh » 27 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm

When water evaporates or gets consumed, it always goes back to gaseous individual molecules to reform into another completely different combination of molecules being water purified water on another cycle. Rhetorical question, 2 parts hydrogen one part water is 3 molecule combination created by "atmospheric conditions and temperature changes from sea level to ionosphere.".
 

No it doesn't.  Oxygen and Hydrogen readily combine with other elements to form a near infinite number of organic and other compounds. If H2O didn't easily break apart and recombine with other elements, there would be no life on earth.

So are ions lighter than protons,

Oh, for ****'s sake!  Clearly you don't know what the ionic state of an atom is. Freaking DUMB question. Yes folks, contrary to what your woke teachers told you - THERE ARE STUPID QUESTIONS, and ^^^^^^^ that is an example of one.
 

DeplorablePatriot » 27 Jul 2023, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2023, 7:34 pm

If you think the civil war was about slavery, you are just a little...no, a lot wrong. It was about money.

LOL - did you read what I wrote (composed)?  No you didn't.  Nor should you.  It was gibberish.   Pure gibberish in the style of Omh, where it starts out almost intelligible and then devolves into scrambled-brain batter. I did it to prove some dumb point I can't even remember.
 
 

MackTheFinger » 27 Jul 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2023, 11:05 pm

. 

Mack, are those oil stains on your driveway from your Harley marking its territory?  
 

Skans » 28 Jul 2023, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 8:20 am

No it doesn't.  Oxygen and Hydrogen readily combine with other elements to form a near infinite number of organic and other compounds. If H2O didn't easily break apart and recombine with other elements, there would be no life on earth.

Oh, for ****'s sake!  Clearly you don't know what the ionic state of an atom is. Freaking DUMB question. Yes folks, contrary to what your woke teachers told you - THERE ARE STUPID QUESTIONS, and ^^^^^^^ that is an example of one.
 

ha ha ha ha ha ha. evolving includes erosion and decomposition to anything of form or shape correct?

Expanding forms shaped by combined molecular content which happens to be periodic elements just above the atomic combinations having a nucleus and characteristics of occupying time

Past folding the future has a medium point of exchanging energy flows pushing apart and pulling together equally where there exists a space of perpetual balancing outcomes present in plain sight of navigating within, among, between, each individual part of the whole kinetic processing taking place in plain sight.


now. eternity. specific timing, actual displacements, specific actions teamed with specific reactions spontaneously present each simultaneously existing.

Your mind really won't be honest about how your brain navigates being alive now. My brain does and I defend my time as equally evolving forward here. I can disprove negatives as easy as your positive attitude now hasn't ever been honestly educated to any great great grandchild in over 350 generation gaps within this species destroying itself intellectually pretending it is physically impossible to be eternally separated now...

Nostradamus'omh » 28 Jul 2023, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 9:22 am

ha ha ha ha ha ha. evolving includes erosion and decomposition to anything of form or shape correct?

Expanding forms shaped by combined molecular content which happens to be periodic elements just above the atomic combinations having a nucleus and characteristics of occupying time

Past folding the future has a medium point of exchanging energy flows pushing apart and pulling together equally where there exists a space of perpetual balancing outcomes present in plain sight of navigating within, among, between, each individual part of the whole kinetic processing taking place in plain sight.

now..

HA HA HA HA HAHAHAHAHA!!!!  Omh - exposed again by Skans.
 

Skans » 28 Jul 2023, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 9:24 am

HA HA HA HA HAHAHAHAHA!!!!  Omh - exposed again by Skans.
 

Yes you exposed my instinctive honesty. Thank you because at the same time you exposed your reality's intentions forward from here. Keep corruption governing tomorrows today until extinction ends humans staying in character of all or nothing to anything else is possible mantra.

BuckNaked » 28 Jul 2023, 5:48 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 5:48 am

what if it’s bald?

Then one in the hand is not as good as one in the clam.

Nostradamus'omh » 28 Jul 2023, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 5:58 am

describe "IT"...
 

Skans » 25 Jul 2023, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2023, 7:27 am

Anyone born a male remains a male.  Penis, balls, hormones, genetics, pheromones, bone structure, musculature, lack of female reproductive organs, different brain development, etc.  Men and women are fundamentally different. Even down to ever cell in a person's body. Every cell in a male's body is different than those in a female's body.  

Slapping on a silicone clown suit and being a good makeup artist does not change a person's gender.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89MMWRGkWZo
 

maineman » 25 Jul 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2023, 8:33 am

not enough violence, angst, and hatred for you?

Too much desperation smell and cuckery, fruity.

Sell your pabulum to hallmark. 
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Jul 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 10:43 am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89MMWRGkWZo

You know, I couldn't stand Mr. Rodgers as a kid. He had a very effeminate way about him that I just thought was creepy, and I didn't even know what *** were at the time.  Refused to watch the guy.  If caught my brother watching Rodgers on TV and he wouldn't change the station, I would punch him until he did. (Yeah, I actually regret doing that...sort of).

As an adult, I looked into who he really was, and found him to be a good, honorable man.  Oh, I still think he was a latent homosexual, but he chose to lead a heterosexual life and stay true to his family....I hope.
 

Skans » 28 Jul 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 10:51 am

You know, I couldn't stand Mr. Rodgers as a kid. He had a very effeminate way about him that I just thought was creepy, and I didn't even know what *** were at the time.  Refused to watch the guy.  If caught my brother watching Rodgers on TV and he wouldn't change the station, I would punch him until he did. (Yeah, I actually regret doing that...sort of).

As an adult, I looked into who he really was, and found him to be a good, honorable man.  Oh, I still think he was a latent homosexual, but he chose to lead a heterosexual life and stay true to his family....I hope.

He wasn't around when I was a kid - but I'd have had the same reaction, as would my brothers have done. I agree with your assessment. 

You know, when I was a youngster, Mamaw Henley down the street pulled my younger brother and me into a confederacy one summer. She plied us with cookies for weeks in advance of her only grandson's visit, and after we were well buttered up, she elicited a promise that we two would would come faithfully each day for the week of his visit and play in the yard with Timothy, who was my age.

My brother and I were maybe 8 and 10. Mamaw Henley had a storm cellar and a swing set in her back yard. The swing set even featured a carriage, along with the swings. Mamaw Henley had all that three prepubescent boys required for a rollicking day of make believe. We could be soldiers, cowboys, space explorers, pirates - we could be anything we chose. And Timothy always chose to be a woman. 

Whatever game we devised, Timothy would quickly agree to the game, nominate himself the damsel in distress, and appoint one of us to persecute and the other to rescue him. Or her, as the case may be. 

As a result of this, I'm pretty sure that folks can be gender conflicted at an early age. I saw it happen. And I have sympathy for such folks. Just not the kind of sympathy that would see me screeching against women's rights to privacy, safety, and dignity. 

The extreme misogyny on the left in the name of "inclusion" is so advanced that even Mr. Rogers speaks from the grave against it. 
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Jul 2023, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 11:21 am

He wasn't around when I was a kid - but I'd have had the same reaction, as would my brothers have done. I agree with your assessment. 

You know, when I was a youngster, Mamaw Henley down the street pulled my younger brother and me into a confederacy one summer. She plied us with cookies for weeks in advance of her only grandson's visit, and after we were well buttered up, she elicited a promise that we two would would come faithfully each day for the week of his visit and play in the yard with Timothy, who was my age.

My brother and I were maybe 8 and 10. Mamaw Henley had a storm cellar and a swing set in her back yard. The swing set even featured a carriage, along with the swings. Mamaw Henley had all that three prepubescent boys required for a rollicking day of make believe. We could be soldiers, cowboys, space explorers, pirates - we could be anything we chose. And Timothy always chose to be a woman. 

Whatever game we devised, Timothy would quickly agree to the game, nominate himself the damsel in distress, and appoint one of us to persecute and the other to rescue him. Or her, as the case may be. 

As a result of this, I'm pretty sure that folks can be gender conflicted at an early age. I saw it happen. And I have sympathy for such folks. Just not the kind of sympathy that would see me screeching against women's rights to privacy, safety, and dignity. 

The extreme misogyny on the left in the name of "inclusion" is so advanced that even Mr. Rogers speaks from the grave against it.

An interesting short story.  And, nicely written too.  You've been holding out on us.
 

DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2023, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2023, 10:38 am

Then one in the hand is not as good as one in the clam.

no it’s not Blahaha 

DeplorablePatriot » 27 Jul 2023, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2023, 7:34 pm

If you think the civil war was about slavery, you are just a little...no, a lot wrong. It was about money.