The White House Does Damage Control After Kamala Harris Claims ‘Reducing Population’ is Needed to Fight Climate Change

User avatar
By Majik
16 Jul 2023 8:27 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 8:27 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
Kamala Harris made an interesting remark during a speech on the purportedly devastating effects of climate change on Friday.“When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breath clean air and drink clean water,” she said to applause.The White House has already “corrected” the transcript of the speech by claiming that Harris meant to say “pollution.”

 But Harris did not correct herself during her speech, and the audience applauded her message apparently without bridling at the de-population message.Kamala Harris’s remarks, whether scripted or unscripted, do reflect a segment of the climate change activist community’s views on the matter.

 In 2019, more than 11,000 “experts” signed an emergency declaration warning that energy, food and reproduction must “change immediately,” according to Bloomberg News.Kathleen Mogelgaard, a consultant on population dynamics and climate change and an adjunct professor at the University of Maryland, told the Canadian site CBC News that population does play a role in climate change.“It is a very complicated, multifaceted relationship. Population issues certainly are an important dimension of how society will unfold, how society will be able to cope with this crisis over the course of this century,” said Mogelgaard.“But it’s not a silver bullet, and it’s certainly not the main cause of climate change. And fully addressing population growth is not, on its own, going to be able to solve the climate crisis. But it is an important piece of the puzzle,” she added.

But not all climate change activist groups agree on the population issue.

 
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 8:28 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
The Union of Concerned Scientists, a radical activist group, has sought to dispel the connection between population and climate change.“A misplaced focus on population growth as a key driver of past, present, and future climate change conflates a rise in emissions with an increase in people, rather than the real source of those emissions: an increase in cars, power plants, airplanes, industries, buildings, and other parts of our fossil fuel-dependent economy and lifestyles,” UCS claimed. “Implicit in this faulty framing is the notion that all people contribute significantly to heat-trapping emissions. In fact, data show (PDF) that the richest 10 percent of the world’s population contributes 50 percent of annual global warming emissions.

”Harris, throughout her speech, engaged in unfounded alarmism about natural climate change and mankind’s relatively minor effect upon it.“And we have seen, around our country, where communities have been choked by drought, have been washed out by floods, and decimated by hurricanes,” she said. “Here in Baltimore, you have seen your skies darkened by wildfire smoke.  And you have seen the waters of the Chesapeake Bay rise, threatening homes and businesses that have stood for generations.”“It is clear that the clock is not only ticking, it is banging.  And we must act,” she claimed.

 But a 2022 study, “a critical assessment of extreme events trends in times of global warming,” examines the data and finds that claims about natural disasters due to climate change posing a threat to human life are grossly exaggerated. Numerous types of natural disasters – from hurricanes to tornadoes to heat waves to droughts – have either increased only modestly in frequency and intensity over the last hundred years or have not increased at all.“We need to remind ourselves that addressing climate change is not an end in itself, and that climate change is not the only problem that the world is facing,” the authors add. “The objective should be to improve human well-being in the twenty-first century, while protecting the environment as much as we can…”

​​​​​​Indeed, one of the most compelling pieces of evidence that nature is not posing more of a threat to mankind, but is actually posing much less of one, is the statistical fact that deaths from natural disasters have declined by 99% in the past century.As Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) thoroughly explained in a recent hearing with Climate Czar John Kerry, the Democratic Party wants American taxpayers to foot the bill for a $1.6 quadrillion scam.

Perry further accused climate scientists of “grifting like you are.” Now that is a serious burn.

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/kamala ... whatfinger
 
User avatar
razoo
16 Jul 2023 8:31 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,208 posts
need a real source link .......
User avatar
razoo
16 Jul 2023 8:34 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,208 posts
Climate benefits


Global action to reduce short-lived climate pollutants can prevent 0.6°C of warming by 2050. Cutting emissions of carbon dioxide and short-lived climate pollutants is critical to slow the rate of global warming and achieve the 2°C target set by the Paris Agreement.


Why we need to act now | Climate & Clean Air Coalition
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 8:44 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
Kamala isn't even hiding it anymore ....
Depopulation is on the menu .....

From 2009....

and the last line in the article is precious. ...
Not only should we have been worried but we should have been forewarned. ....

Billionaires Try to Shrink World's Population, Report Says
By Robert Frank
May 26, 2009 11:57 am ET

Share

Resize
Last week's meeting of the Great and the Good (or the Richest and Richer) was bound to draw criticism.

Associated Press

The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.

There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting.

But in an age of fallen wealth idols, it was inevitable that a meeting of billionaire minds would draw scrutiny. Surely all that money and power in one room had to spell trouble for the rest of us.

An article in the Times of London, headlined "Billionaire Club in Bid to Curb World Population," said the issues discussed in the top-secret meeting included health care, education and--by far the most controversial--slowing the global population growth.

"Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority," the article said, adding that "this could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values."

Such a stand wouldn't be surprising. Mssrs. Gates, Buffett and Turner have been quietly worrying about Malthusian population problems for years. Mr. Gates in February outlined a plan to try to cap the world's population at 8.3 billion people, rather than the projected 9.3 billion at which the population is expected to peak.

But some right-leaning blogs have started attacking the billionaires as forming a kind of secret sterilization society or giant ATM to fund abortions. It fed into time-honored fears of the rich using their wealth to reshape mankind in its preferred image. Some are raising the specter of eugenics.

I am not taking a stand on population control. But from what I was personally told about the meeting--and what the Times spells out further down in its story--population control was just one of many items raised during the meeting, as each philanthropist talked about what they were working on. It wasn't the reason for meeting and there are no real plans for a follow-up confab.

The notion that this secret gathering was aimed mostly at shrinking the world's population just doesn't ring true.

That said, almost all of the attendees are politically liberal. Do you think this Star Chamber of Philanthropists is something to worry about or something to be grateful for?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-WHB-1322
 
 
User avatar
Neo
16 Jul 2023 8:45 am
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
Agw is a death cult. Killing higher income first world consumers will have more impact on the climate than killing them in the third world due to their resource consumption. Would have to abort a thousand Ethiopians to equal the carbon footprint of one Brit.
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 8:54 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
razoo » 16 Jul 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: need a real source link .......
Hahaha.
No, you need to get your head out of your *** and realize you have been targeted by a very real global agenda of de-population .....
The source link isn't the problem....
your continual disbelief ....is another matter....
 
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 8:58 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
razoo » 16 Jul 2023, 8:34 am » wrote: Climate benefits

Global action to reduce short-lived climate pollutants can prevent 0.6°C of warming by 2050. Cutting emissions of carbon dioxide and short-lived climate pollutants is critical to slow the rate of global warming and achieve the 2°C target set by the Paris Agreement.

Why we need to act now | Climate & Clean Air Coalition
We are carbon based lifeforms that breathe in oxygen and expel carbon dioxide ....
and there are billions of us ....
read between the lines ....idiot.
YOUR GLOBAL WARMING CULT IS A DEATH CULT .....


 
User avatar
Neo
16 Jul 2023 9:02 am
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
Majik » 16 Jul 2023, 8:58 am » wrote: We are carbon based lifeforms that breathe in oxygen and expel carbon dioxide ....
and there are billions of us ....
read between the lines ....idiot.
YOUR GLOBAL WARMING CULT IS A DEATH CULT .....
Water vapor is by far the biggest greenhouse gas on the planet but that didn't test market well. 
 
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 9:06 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
Z09 » 16 Jul 2023, 8:39 am » wrote: Agaffe made by Vice President Kamala Harris in which she accidentally described a plan to "reduce population" has been leapt upon by conservative figures as proof of a conspiracy theory.
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris- ... ch-1813149
Razoo still believes that Biden's alzheimer's moment of Truth when he stated ...
“We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
was a gaffe.
So, this time won't be any different ....
all is well in Razoo land ....

​,
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 9:11 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
Neo » 16 Jul 2023, 8:45 am » wrote: Agw is a death cult. Killing higher income first world consumers will have more impact on the climate than killing them in the third world due to their resource consumption. Would have to abort a thousand Ethiopians to equal the carbon footprint of one Brit.
The middle class is definitely a large demographic in their depopulation plans .....
but not the only demographic .....


 
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 9:21 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
Neo » 16 Jul 2023, 9:02 am » wrote: Water vapor is by far the biggest greenhouse gas on the planet but that didn't test market well.
But The deniers like Razoo of the great reset that the climate death cult has planned and has started implimenting will suffer the same fate as they defend the agenda of their own demise ....it's darkly humorous. ..if anything else...
User avatar
razoo
16 Jul 2023 9:59 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,208 posts
In the official White House transcript of the speech, the word "population" is crossed out, and replaced with the word "pollution" which Harris was meant to have said..........

It was an error in the transcript not an error by Kamala Harris ..........of course the fake republicans will push distortion BECAUSE THEY EAT, DRINK AND VOMIT CONSPIRACY THEORIES .................................. Harris did not write the transcript.
User avatar
ROG62
16 Jul 2023 10:24 am
User avatar
      
21,575 posts
Majik » 16 Jul 2023, 8:27 am » wrote: Kamala Harris made an interesting remark during a speech on the purportedly devastating effects of climate change on Friday.“When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breath clean air and drink clean water,” she said to applause.The White House has already “corrected” the transcript of the speech by claiming that Harris meant to say “pollution.”

 But Harris did not correct herself during her speech, and the audience applauded her message apparently without bridling at the de-population message.Kamala Harris’s remarks, whether scripted or unscripted, do reflect a segment of the climate change activist community’s views on the matter.

 In 2019, more than 11,000 “experts” signed an emergency declaration warning that energy, food and reproduction must “change immediately,” according to Bloomberg News.Kathleen Mogelgaard, a consultant on population dynamics and climate change and an adjunct professor at the University of Maryland, told the Canadian site CBC News that population does play a role in climate change.“It is a very complicated, multifaceted relationship. Population issues certainly are an important dimension of how society will unfold, how society will be able to cope with this crisis over the course of this century,” said Mogelgaard.“But it’s not a silver bullet, and it’s certainly not the main cause of climate change. And fully addressing population growth is not, on its own, going to be able to solve the climate crisis. But it is an important piece of the puzzle,” she added.

But not all climate change activist groups agree on the population issue.
just need more Covid type releases...
 
Image JuCo 5 percenter... “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl:
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 10:35 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
razoo » 16 Jul 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: In the official White House transcript of the speech, the word "population" is crossed out, and replaced with the word "pollution" which Harris was meant to have said..........

It was an error in the transcript not an error by Kamala Harris ..........of course the fake republicans will push distortion BECAUSE THEY EAT, DRINK AND VOMIT CONSPIRACY THEORIES .................................. Harris did not write the transcript.
DEMOCRAT DEMOCIDE KAMALA HARRIS CALLS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION + BIDEN DEPOPULATION SPEECH

https://www.bitchute.com/video/VIH9maYGSCqV/

The depopulation conspiracy is being committed against every American including you .....
Biden's speech lays it all out ....
watch the speech...
 
Buck Naked
16 Jul 2023 10:38 am
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
14,084 posts
Abortion is a form of population control
User avatar
razoo
16 Jul 2023 10:39 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,208 posts
In the official White House transcript of the speech, the word "population" is crossed out, and replaced with the word "pollution" which Harris was meant to have said..........

It was an error in the transcript not an error by Kamala Harris ..........of course the fake republicans will push distortion BECAUSE THEY EAT, DRINK AND VOMIT CONSPIRACY THEORIES .................................. Harris did not write the transcript.
0
User avatar
Majik
16 Jul 2023 10:47 am
User avatar
      
6,188 posts
ROG62 » 16 Jul 2023, 10:24 am » wrote: just need more Covid type releases...
The entire system from healthcare  to food production and beyond has been changed and subverted to realize and ramp up their depopulation goals by 2030 .....and will continue until 2050.....
And yes I think more pandemics are on the horizon and not necessarily covid pandemics especially if the majority of the  general population stops lining up for their covid booster shots....
 
User avatar
ROG62
16 Jul 2023 11:13 am
User avatar
      
21,575 posts
Majik » 16 Jul 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: The entire system from healthcare  to food production and beyond has been changed and subverted to realize and ramp up their depopulation goals by 2030 .....and will continue until 2050.....
And yes I think more pandemics are on the horizon and not necessarily covid pandemics especially if the majority of the  general population stops lining up for their covid booster shots....
correct, Covid type IE next level of airborne contagion...
 
Image JuCo 5 percenter... “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl:
1 2

Who is online

In total there are 3378 users online :: 8 registered, 15 bots, and 3355 guests
Bots: facebookexternalhit, Not, semantic-visions.com, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, proximic, app.hypefactors.com, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, linkfluence.com, bingbot, curl/7, CriteoBot, BLEXBot, Googlebot
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum