That’s a racist statement, Brucie boy.Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 10:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Very true.
And I’ve found the best source of indie movies is in some college town in a small independent theatre where I’m the only former Republican in miles.
Liberals love the **** out of indie movies.
Two French films I recommend for those who like foreign:DeezerShoove » 18 Jul 2023, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ There was a Japanese film "Iron Man" (subtitled) I watched with interest. 1990's movie.
Just because I can't seem to find it, I want to...![]()
Surreal, fantasy, man that became magnetic dragging stuff...
ps
Hollyweird has to take liberties when putting a novel to the screen. Understandable.
I was disappointed in the One Flew Over the Cuckoo Nest ending.
Would have been better to end it with a short scene depicting the book's epilogue.
Otherwise a great movie and Jack played the part well even thought the book's character did not match Nicholson's physical stature.
Two departures from the book; one easily dismissed, one was a small miss.
ps2
Bruthe seems like Will Franklin: Obtuse, verbose, attention whore.
It gets a 6.9 on IMDB. Very noir. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096251/?r ... on%2520manDeezerShoove » 18 Jul 2023, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ There was a Japanese film "Iron Man" (subtitled) I watched with interest. 1990's movie.
Just because I can't seem to find it, I want to...![]()
Well, it was not in the database a few years ago. Jus' sayin'...Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2023, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It gets a 6.9 on IMDB. Very noir. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096251/?r ... on%2520man
You're welcome, nuckle.
It was way down the page.DeezerShoove » 18 Jul 2023, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, it was not in the database a few years ago. Jus' sayin'...
Now you know the odd **** I can get interested by. Thanks.
That "Tetsou" **** baffled it maybe...Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2023, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ It was way down the page.
When I first responded to you, I had searched IMDB for it. I had googled it and duckduckgoed it.
But I tried it again, and fount da muffugga by scrlling down...
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ I’m going to not only see Sound of Freedom, I’ll buy it and put it beside Passion of Christ.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ But by November Sound of Freedom will be $3 to rent and $5 to buy at Red Box.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑This year, I’ll pick Sound of Freedom, and other such righteous deer camp movies.Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑The star played Christ, for Mel Gibson in 2004 so no way I’m dissing it.Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no polite way to say this.
The movie is just another low budget action thriller with a no name cast.
... The liberal media is laughing at MAGAS who believe a B grade action movie is real.
What is a righteous movie?
In the two thousand years since the first Christians escaped death from the hands of the Sanhedrin, many stories have been told about the constant battle between good and evil.
The man who played Christ for Mel Gibson would never consent to playing a villain.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ Remember 14 million won’t hire even one big name movie star like Tom Crews in Maverick. This is a low budget action movie. The eye candy babe Star was fifty when it was filmed in 2018.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ Sound of Freedom is certain to inspire a host of almost the same plot movies.
It is a remake of Romancing the Stone, using children instead of starlets.
The Professional is also a similar movie, from 1994.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Léon:_The_Professional
Everybody loves the good guy rescuing a damsel in distress.
http://www.whatismymovie.com/DeezerShoove » 18 Jul 2023, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ That "Tetsou" **** baffled it maybe...
I was into some Japanese surrealism for a while.
Same time frame was a young girl superhero type.
I remember a floor she was on while doing battle kept losing pieces and she had to be agile.
Then again I was watching Santa Sangre type stuff too.
Probably an MK Ultra flashback period of my life.
It is marketed to MAGAS.Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I asked, "Why are democ rats against this film.
A democ rat tried to answer - tried over and over.
Can anyone ELSE reconcile his many answers?
No.
Why did the op assume I hated the movie?Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2023, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No.
You made that up.
You are a liar.
Provide evidence, or acknowldge that is not true. It is being DEFENDED by MAGAs - and attacked by you and your bed fellows. You attacked it in this very thread.
Show us your evidence that it is being marketed to any particular political camp.
Go.
All the **** liberals hate the movie.
The entire premise of this thread is Brucie is down on Sound of Freedom and why do liberals hate Sound of Freedom.
He's like a Marvel Action Character.....Captain Deflecto.
Why did you prove the op right by **** on the movie before you wiggled yourself into the opposite position, parrot?
Link me to some of that marketing, retard.Bruce » 18 Jul 2023, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ All the marketing hype behind the movie was “liberals are pedophile supporters so they hate Sound of Freedom”.
Why did you prove me right, ****?Bruce » 18 Jul 2023, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Why did the op assume I hated the movie?
I love small budget thrillers, ever since Badlands.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ But by November Sound of Freedom will be $3 to rent and $5 to buy at Red Box.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑There is no polite way to say this.
The movie is just another low budget action thriller with a no name cast.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑... The liberal media is laughing at MAGAS who believe a B grade action movie is real.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ Remember 14 million won’t hire even one big name movie star like Tom Crews in Maverick. This is a low budget action movie. The eye candy babe Star was fifty when it was filmed in 2018.
Bruce » 17 Jul 2023, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ Sound of Freedom is certain to inspire a host of almost the same plot movies.
It is a remake of Romancing the Stone, using children instead of starlets.
everyone knows why the left hates films that are critical of pedophiliaCannonpointer » 16 Jul 2023, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑ @Bruce has been instructed to badmouth this movie - he made mention of it out of the side of his face like a good little pedophile enabler.
This movie is based on the work of an ACTUAL INVESTIGATOR of sex trafficking. He speaks here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eHI0FDqbsc
I haven’t seen it yet.Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2023, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Why did you prove the op right by **** on the movie before you wiggled yourself into the opposite position, parrot?
Link me to some of that marketing, retard.
The "liberals are pedophile supporters" argument is a REACTION TO YOUR ATTACKS. And by "your," I mean you and the other grooming dicksucks who **** on this film.