There's nothing wrong with committing war crimes, as long as you win the war. Its a farce to think that murdering combatants is somehow morally superior to murdering non-combatants who enjoy the benefits of the country paying for and supporting the combatants. IT'S WAR - PEOPLE DIE!!!roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ "Hegseth remarked that if Vladimir Putin was considered a war criminal for using cluster bombs, why would the US authorize sending the formerly banned cluster bombs to the Ukrainians?"
https://freedombeacon.com/white-house-a ... e-with-it/
ignorance on steroidsSkans » 17 Jul 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ There's nothing wrong with committing war crimes, as long as you win the war. Its a farce to think that murdering combatants is somehow morally superior to murdering non-combatants who enjoy the benefits of the country paying for and supporting the combatants. IT'S WAR - PEOPLE DIE!!!
Skanny tends to yap away
not sure if he is a teen, or a goofball old ****
Hmmm, my guess is old bitter nursing home shut in.
Skans » 17 Jul 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ There's nothing wrong with committing war crimes, as long as you win the war. Its a farce to think that murdering combatants is somehow morally superior to murdering non-combatants who enjoy the benefits of the country paying for and supporting the combatants. IT'S WAR - PEOPLE DIE!!!
Sumela » 17 Jul 2023, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ When has WASH DC ever been a fair dealer.
The Elites are always duplicitous.
I get it, you only support "civilized" wars. Where only a select few put their lives at risk of being murdered. A game, so to speak, where the participants die, but the spectators get to enjoy the show from the safety of their living rooms. Where the select few combatants allow it to be "hands off" when it comes to the rest of their countrymen and women.roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Not all citizens support everything. Innocent people die even well after a war is over due to unexploded cluster bombs.
Many citizens are misled into believing they're supporting a good cause.
I have a question, the cluster bombs America sends Ukraine being used on Ukraine soil against the Russian invaders? Not Russia land against its citizens?roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ "Hegseth remarked that if Vladimir Putin was considered a war criminal for using cluster bombs, why would the US authorize sending the formerly banned cluster bombs to the Ukrainians?"
https://freedombeacon.com/white-house-a ... e-with-it/
That depends, Omh, on whether I am flying the plane or some rule-following grunt meticulously adhering to orders given by those who can't see the bigger picture.Nostradamus'omh » 17 Jul 2023, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ I have a question, the cluster bombs America sends Ukraine being used on Ukraine soil against the Russian invaders? Not Russia land against its citizens?
All you do is hyperbole. You never discuss actual evolving.Skans » 17 Jul 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ That depends, Omh, on whether I am flying the plane or some rule-following grunt meticulously adhering to orders given by those who can't see the bigger picture.
Nostradamus'omh » 17 Jul 2023, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ I have a question, the cluster bombs America sends Ukraine being used on Ukraine soil against the Russian invaders? Not Russia land against its citizens?
I haven't cared enough to research it. this is a global ruling elite exercise to **** everyone over.
Rationalizing again to cover your own ideology. Loophole mania.roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ Cluster bombs apparently have a higher rate of unexploded bombs and after the war is over innocent people are still at risk.
Skans » 17 Jul 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ I get it, you only support "civilized" wars. Where only a select few put their lives at risk of being murdered. A game, so to speak, where the participants die, but the spectators get to enjoy the show from the safety of their living rooms. Where the select few combatants allow it to be "hands off" when it comes to the rest of their countrymen and women.
I, on the other hand, believe wars should be messy with guts and body parts of even non-combatants being blown sky-high in the inferno of hell, man makes on earth. No holds barred. Win. Or, die. Annihilation of the losing side and to the victors go all the spoils of war. Extermination of the enemy. Once war commences, there can be no lasting peace between two warring factions without this type of resolution.
Nostradamus'omh » 17 Jul 2023, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ Rationalizing again to cover your own ideology. Loophole mania.
And, you don't read your own gibberish; nor do you write any of it in real time. I believe you cut & paste most of it from a phrase list you keep.Nostradamus'omh » 17 Jul 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ All you do is hyperbole. You never discuss actual evolving.
This is why you are so HATED!Skans » 17 Jul 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ I get it, you only support "civilized" wars. Where only a select few put their lives at risk of being murdered. A game, so to speak, where the participants die, but the spectators get to enjoy the show from the safety of their living rooms. Where the select few combatants allow it to be "hands off" when it comes to the rest of their countrymen and women.
I, on the other hand, believe wars should be messy with guts and body parts of even non-combatants being blown sky-high in the inferno of hell, man makes on earth. No holds barred. Win. Or, die. Annihilation of the losing side and to the victors go all the spoils of war. Extermination of the enemy. Once war commences, there can be no lasting peace between two warring factions without this type of resolution.