And the older the worse this issue is. These were made in the early 80s...40 yrs old.roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ Cluster bombs apparently have a higher rate of unexploded bombs and after the war is over innocent people are still at risk.
Sumela » 17 Jul 2023, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ And the older the worse this issue is. These were made in the early 80s...40 yrs old.
Its simply NATO desperation and lack of 155 shells
roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ Just think what would happen if all news outlets were staffed with real journalists.
According to honest American ex military, CIA etc..like Larry Johnson, the reason we are running low is becauseroadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ Just think what would happen if all news outlets were staffed with real journalists.
All your mind can do is believe what you learned after birth was a historical description of life with or without you in it.Skans » 17 Jul 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ And, you don't read your own gibberish; nor do you write any of it in real time. I believe you cut & paste most of it from a phrase list you keep.
Whatever. You don't read your own gibberish. You have no interest in any of the **** you say. And, I proved it. Game over.Nostradamus'omh » 17 Jul 2023, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ All your mind can do is believe what you learned after birth was a historical description of life with or without you in it.
Remember this spew of dicksuck when the war comes to your family, fruity.Skans » 17 Jul 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ There's nothing wrong with committing war crimes, as long as you win the war. Its a farce to think that murdering combatants is somehow morally superior to murdering non-combatants who enjoy the benefits of the country paying for and supporting the combatants. IT'S WAR - PEOPLE DIE!!!
What matters is that he is a partisan clown whose opinions are provided from out of house - so NATURALLY there will be cognitive dissonance, much as there is often a clash of samples on plates returning from a buffet line.
No, jaggov - it does not depend on that. If you are flying the plane, you will drop them IN THEATER - not somewhere ineffective, you **** dolt.Skans » 17 Jul 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ That depends, Omh, on whether I am flying the plane or some rule-following grunt meticulously adhering to orders given by those who can't see the bigger picture.
You see what YOU see.
LOL, yer trying to talk sense into a redneck who types ""Nukular'em" 50 times a dayCannonpointer » 17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No, jaggov - it does not depend on that. If you are flying the plane, you will drop them IN THEATER - not somewhere ineffective, you **** dolt.
And when you do, a certain number will fail to deploy, and of those, a certain number will maim and kill civilians not yet born.
Just shut the **** up for a minute and try to think.
THINK.
They messed up! with canning Tucker_roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Fox has disappointed me...but I think there's still some good employees there...who knows for how much longer.
Name one that is solid on foreign policy.....roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Fox has disappointed me...but I think there's still some good employees there...who knows for how much longer.
sootedupCyndi » 17 Jul 2023, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ They messed up! with canning Tucker_
Now- they are moving them all around to dif time slots- ok? in desperation? save FOX!
all the fill in hosts are nice folks---- just bores!
it's like a bad attempt to save a bad tv line up... the weekends are horrible! and the shows are too!
That's what's going on! I am totally bored with it!roadkill » 17 Jul 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't know all that...I don't have cable or dish.
I see Fox stuff on Youtube sometimes, and I'll post it if it seems right...but the leftist management has fowled things further.
The only one that comes close is Ingraham...is she still there?