I have always thought your theory was just as plausible or more soVegas » 22 Jul 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I have started many threads about this...well, here is another one.
Pentagon: Where is the **** plane?
Building 7: What the **** caused that collapse? It wasn't hit. And building fires don't cause a straight down collapse...they just burn.
Twin Towers: Engineers have repeatedly said that the impacts of the plane and jet fuel could not take down those towers, especially straight down like that.
Amateur pilots: How the hell can 19 rag heads, with barely any flight experience, fly those gigantic planes with such precision?
Sure looked to me like one of those demolition take downs- like a huge hotel in vegas. Boom. The entire thing was kind of creepy?Vegas » 22 Jul 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I have started many threads about this...well, here is another one.
Pentagon: Where is the **** plane?
Building 7: What the **** caused that collapse? It wasn't hit. And building fires don't cause a straight down collapse...they just burn.
Twin Towers: Engineers have repeatedly said that the impacts of the plane and jet fuel could not take down those towers, especially straight down like that.
Amateur pilots: How the hell can 19 rag heads, with barely any flight experience, fly those gigantic planes with such precision?
That is plausible. A missile shooting down a hijacked aircraft would be comparatively easy to cover up and sell a story of heroism to the public.RebelGator » 22 Jul 2023, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I found it plausible that one floor collapsing on another would cause an increasing domino effect. The floors would fall straight down to the bottom.
I also find it plausible the Pennsylvania crash was caused by a missile strike (shot down).
Bldg 7 was not even hit by an airplane....burned 3-4 hours...then pure free fall.Neo » 22 Jul 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ That is plausible. A missile shooting down a hijacked aircraft would be comparatively easy to cover up and sell a story of heroism to the public.
Controlled demolition isn't plausible.
OOOO that was the one! i was just trying to remember that!Sumela » 22 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Bldg 7 was not even hit by an airplane....burned 3-4 hours...then pure free fall.
Very curious
They were receiving flight instructions and paying cash money for their instruction ........... odd thing about this instruction is they were not interested in landing only take off .......Vegas » 22 Jul 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I have started many threads about this...well, here is another one.
Pentagon: Where is the **** plane?
Building 7: What the **** caused that collapse? It wasn't hit. And building fires don't cause a straight down collapse...they just burn.
Twin Towers: Engineers have repeatedly said that the impacts of the plane and jet fuel could not take down those towers, especially straight down like that.
Amateur pilots: How the hell can 19 rag heads, with barely any flight experience, fly those gigantic planes with such precision?
razoo » 22 Jul 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ They were receiving flight instructions and paying cash money for their instruction ........... odd thing about this instruction is they were not interested in landing only take off .......
Where was the GW Bush surveillance team? No where to be found. Clinton had these terrorists under surveillance then GW came along and provided no more funding. Inside job? You bet inside the Bush admin,
Big brother knew of these nut jobs yet lost funding and they were living within walking distance of NSA headquarters yet still got away with this terrorist activity................. Inside job = the GOP
Z09 » 22 Jul 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Clinton had these people under surveillance?
If so why didn't he remove them from the country over 8 years he was in office?
Later on when the smaller tower (WTC 7) fell in where Rudy Gilliani was without ever being touched explained why the two towers collapsed.
I did not say that you said that and you are lying .....
OK Alex Jones, were the passengers that called home crisis actors? Were the pilots and air traffic control involved in the plot? Occums Razor, simplest answer is generally the correct answer.Vegas » 22 Jul 2023, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is my theory:
Planes have had autopilot technology for decades. Plug in the directional coordinates and a pilot literally doesn't even have to fly the plane. They just sit there and make sure all is good. Therefore, it is more plausible that there were no 19 rag headed hijackers. The planes were pre-programmed without the pilot's knowledge. The system was over-rid. Communication to the control tower was also cut off. The planes were locked on autopilot with the twin tower coordinates and wherever the third plane was supposed to go. Maybe the pilots heard what was happening and found a way to crash it. There was no fourth plane, that was a missile that hit the pentagon.
The twin towers falling was a demolition, as well as the other building that wasn't even hit.
Im not saying I know what happened.sootedupCyndi » 22 Jul 2023, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑ OOOO that was the one! i was just trying to remember that!