Liberal Forum

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 8:08 pm

You're trying to convince us by claiming "you don't care"..
 

First line. ^^^ Didn't answer my questions. Thus, I didn't read the reast of your copy/pasted garbage.

You keep wasting time writing more **** after I have told you that it goes unread. How stupid do you get? 

Kobia2 » 14 Aug 2023, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 9:36 pm

          

            On the heliport thousands of tiny shards of airplane wreckage cover the ground, 9/11/01 — Photo by jamie McIntyre ©2001
 
          

I don't see a window or anything. Just a bunch pieces that could easily be the pentagon. 

A piece of wreckage that appears to be a cockpit window — 9/11/01 — Photo by Jamie McIntyre ©2001
 

Not shown to be at the pentagon. It could be from any crash anywhere.

The picture I was arrested for taking. A Pentagon Police officer claimed I violated the ban on photography. — 9/11/10 — Photo by Jamie McIntyre ©2001

No plane pieces. Just fire crews putting out a fire. 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:06 am

But you keep responding...


 

I keep responding because I am hopeful that you will be brave enough to answer questions...but alas, you never do. That's my fault for giving you the benefit of the doubt, I guess. 

Sumela » 14 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm

For me its always been... qui bono...who benefited.

The same folks that WROTE....''we need a new pearl harbor moment'' about one year earlier

The same deep state that put together operation northwoods - and then murdered Kennedy when he foiled their various schemes. 

9-11 WAS operation northwoods, 40 years on the shelf. 
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:17 am

You've read dozens of witnesses accounts ..
 

Cameras are much more reliable witnesses than humans. Ironically, those vids were confiscated. I'll take what cameras saw over your witnesses any day. 

Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:21 am

The same deep state that put together operation northwoods - and then murdered Kennedy when he foiled their various schemes. 

9-11 WAS operation northwoods, 40 years on the shelf.

WORD!

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 4:09 pm

@Jantje_Smit  you posted a pic of where all the cameras of the pentagon are, especially the one right above the crash. I looked back, but I can't find it. Can you repost it? I don't expect @Z09  to acknowledge it, but I can at least have fun mocking her with it. Lol

That would be these ones, no way they could have missed a boeing 757, what would be the point of having security cameras if they can't even spot something as big as an airplane..


 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:50 am

Cameras took a ton of photos that day...

You said they're all fake

LOL! Yeah, photos of the hole in the pentagon. No plane. How do you not see the that confiscating vids from 80 cameras is not suspicious? Seriously. How? 

Jantje_Smit » 15 Aug 2023, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:51 am

That would be these ones, no way they could have missed a boeing 757, what would be the point of having security cameras if they can't even spot something as big as an airplane..

@Z09  @Kobia2  Wouldn't it be peachy to see these vids? 

Jantje_Smit » 15 Aug 2023, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:51 am

That would be these ones, no way they could have missed a boeing 757, what would be the point of having security cameras if they can't even spot something as big as an airplane..

Ive heard many say due to the speed it would look like just a blur.   Thats **** silly.

Landing speed is only about 175 mph. 

There should be NUMEROUS cameras showing the plane.
 
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am

Wouldn't it be dandy for you to tell us how a jumbo jet can disappear 15 seconds after 100 people saw it?

As always, Z09 avoids the question. Pure cowardice. 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:06 am

How do you explain video of passengers at the airport

 

First line ^^^. Didn't answer my questions. Therefore, I didn't read the rest of your garbage. Slowest learner ever ^^^

Sumela » 15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am

Ive heard many say due to the speed it would look like just a blur.   Thats **** silly.

Landing speed is only about 175 mph. 

There should be NUMEROUS cameras showing the plane.

I never understood why the lack of film never made more people say

one of the most sophisticated, secure buildings on the planet

and one blurry video from a distance is all that exists?

Mrkelly » 15 Aug 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:47 am

I never understood why the lack of film never made more people say

one of the most sophisticated, secure buildings on the planet

and one blurry video from a distance is all that exists?

Yup. 

Folks have been well trained to not question official narratives.   Left and right.

The libs and cons here that are 100% on board with the 911 official narrative

are ALWAYS fully on board with all official narratives.... and especially foreign policy
 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:23 am

Cameras are much more reliable witnesses than humans. Ironically, those vids were confiscated. I'll take what cameras saw over your witnesses any day.

witnesses are easy to manipulate
 

Mrkelly » 15 Aug 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:47 am

I never understood why the lack of film never made more people say

one of the most sophisticated, secure buildings on the planet

and one blurry video from a distance is all that exists?

Exactly. 80 cameras in total. One was even right above the explosion. Undamaged. That one didn't see anything? 

This is where @Z09   will bring up the pics of plane debris that were never proved to be at the pentagon.  She says the same **** thing over and over. Not once, not even once, has she ever addressed the 80 cameras...she will bring up 100 witnesses also, but never the cameras. 

Sumela » 15 Aug 2023, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 11:01 am

witnesses are easy to manipulate

and unreliable even if they weren't manipulated. Cameras are reliable. 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 11:02 am

Exactly. 80 cameras in total. One was even right above the explosion. Undamaged. That one didn't see anything? 

This is where @Z09   will bring up the pics of plane debris that were never proved to be at the pentagon.  She says the same **** thing over and over. Not once, not even once, has she ever addressed the 80 cameras...she will bring up 100 witnesses also, but never the cameras.

never knew how many cams the are

I just know it has to be a **** 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:43 am

First line ^^^. Didn't answer my questions. Therefore, I didn't read the rest of your garbage. Slowest learner ever ^^^

Debating Z09 is like debating Taipan.

Neocons are all the same.

Always slithering around the truth, but never accepting it.

Z09 posted weeks ago that Osama Bin Laden
was not funded/trained by the Reagan Admin in the 80s in Afghanny...LOL, its declassified common knowledge.
 

Mrkelly » 15 Aug 2023, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 11:04 am

never knew how many cams the are

I just know it has to be a ****

Yep. 80. We got to see one blurry one. Lol.