Liberal Forum

Jantje_Smit » 15 Aug 2023, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:51 am

That would be these ones, no way they could have missed a boeing 757, what would be the point of having security cameras if they can't even spot something as big as an airplane..

Ive heard many say due to the speed it would look like just a blur.   Thats **** silly.

Landing speed is only about 175 mph. 

There should be NUMEROUS cameras showing the plane.
 
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am

Wouldn't it be dandy for you to tell us how a jumbo jet can disappear 15 seconds after 100 people saw it?

As always, Z09 avoids the question. Pure cowardice. 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:06 am

How do you explain video of passengers at the airport

 

First line ^^^. Didn't answer my questions. Therefore, I didn't read the rest of your garbage. Slowest learner ever ^^^

Sumela » 15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am

Ive heard many say due to the speed it would look like just a blur.   Thats **** silly.

Landing speed is only about 175 mph. 

There should be NUMEROUS cameras showing the plane.

I never understood why the lack of film never made more people say

one of the most sophisticated, secure buildings on the planet

and one blurry video from a distance is all that exists?

Mrkelly » 15 Aug 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:47 am

I never understood why the lack of film never made more people say

one of the most sophisticated, secure buildings on the planet

and one blurry video from a distance is all that exists?

Yup. 

Folks have been well trained to not question official narratives.   Left and right.

The libs and cons here that are 100% on board with the 911 official narrative

are ALWAYS fully on board with all official narratives.... and especially foreign policy
 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 9:23 am

Cameras are much more reliable witnesses than humans. Ironically, those vids were confiscated. I'll take what cameras saw over your witnesses any day.

witnesses are easy to manipulate
 

Mrkelly » 15 Aug 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:47 am

I never understood why the lack of film never made more people say

one of the most sophisticated, secure buildings on the planet

and one blurry video from a distance is all that exists?

Exactly. 80 cameras in total. One was even right above the explosion. Undamaged. That one didn't see anything? 

This is where @Z09   will bring up the pics of plane debris that were never proved to be at the pentagon.  She says the same **** thing over and over. Not once, not even once, has she ever addressed the 80 cameras...she will bring up 100 witnesses also, but never the cameras. 

Sumela » 15 Aug 2023, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 11:01 am

witnesses are easy to manipulate

and unreliable even if they weren't manipulated. Cameras are reliable. 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 11:02 am

Exactly. 80 cameras in total. One was even right above the explosion. Undamaged. That one didn't see anything? 

This is where @Z09   will bring up the pics of plane debris that were never proved to be at the pentagon.  She says the same **** thing over and over. Not once, not even once, has she ever addressed the 80 cameras...she will bring up 100 witnesses also, but never the cameras.

never knew how many cams the are

I just know it has to be a **** 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 10:43 am

First line ^^^. Didn't answer my questions. Therefore, I didn't read the rest of your garbage. Slowest learner ever ^^^

Debating Z09 is like debating Taipan.

Neocons are all the same.

Always slithering around the truth, but never accepting it.

Z09 posted weeks ago that Osama Bin Laden
was not funded/trained by the Reagan Admin in the 80s in Afghanny...LOL, its declassified common knowledge.
 

Mrkelly » 15 Aug 2023, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 11:04 am

never knew how many cams the are

I just know it has to be a ****

Yep. 80. We got to see one blurry one. Lol. 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 12:02 pm

I posted weeks ago that Bin Laden was not funded by Reagan?

You're a liar
You are a liar

Show us where I said that...

We'll be waiting

You said it was a bunch of non-sense or something similar.
I think it was "what are you even talking about?" 

One cant really discuss 911 thoroughly without having
the blowback discussion from world meddling and using others as proxy coffin meat.
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm

So the debris were never proven to be at the Pentagon?
News reporters and members of Congress saw the debris..


 

Congress.     

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm

Show us...

I never said that .

It's well know Reagan was funding against the Soviets in Afgan.

Show us my quote

Reagan was funding terrorists????.....

wow, ukSEPShunALjizm.

By the way it was to overthrow the Afghan govt. - not simply to fight the USSR
 

Z09 » 25 Jul 2023, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2023, 7:52 pm

I think we were attacked on 911 by terrorists that had been attacking us for almost a decade...

So Reagan Admin

trained and funded TERRORISTS in the 80s (Osama Bin Laden)

and then 15 years later the fruit of getting in bed with terrorists

cost 3,000 American lives?   

UkSepShunaLLJizm
 
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm

And where did I deny Reagan funded them?

So that makes Reagan a terrorist....?  Yup, crazy

yikes, thats uksePSHunalljizM

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm

You're confused..

We funded the rebels in Afgan that were fighting against the Soviets.
And yes...Reagan approved of it..

However, Bin Laden started his own terrorist group and at time Reagan was just about out of office.

Reagan Admin funded the fighters in Afgan vs the Soviets
He never directly funded Al Qaeda

And you still haven;t shown us any quote I made differently

Wrong again dumb ****.

Reagan trained terrorist Osama Bin Laden and his Mujahadeen terrorists

who wanted to overthrow the Afghan govt.  More meddling leads to blowback.  Thanks Ronny for 911!!

See you learned something today  
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:09 pm

We did learn something....

You were asked to show where I denied the Reagan link
You've yet to show it...

We supporter the fighters in Afgan against the Soviets..
The same way Biden is sending funding to Ukraine against the Soviets

Slithering snake Z09  

So we learned today that

WASH DC trains terrorists

as proxies.

Maybe this is why God is judging America.

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:15 pm

Seems as though you don't have that quote huh?