Liberal Forum

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm

So the debris were never proven to be at the Pentagon?
News reporters and members of Congress saw the debris..

So you need proof even though every media in the country was there and recorded the debris?
Are you well?

The debris was viewed by members of Congress..
Do you deny this?

          Every single photo of Plane debris taken at the Pentagon has been dismissed as having been photographed from some other location --- or those identified as belonging to a Boeing 757 including a Wheel Hub, parts from a Rolls Royce RB211 Turbofan engine, Landing Gear, shredded Aluminum with Yellow Primer used in Aircraft Fuselages having been planted there by the FBI or Black-Ops entities when no one was looking.. 

           Flight 77's two Flight Recorders which were recovered by Paramedics & Firefighters from the crash site were also planted there by the FBI or Black-Ops ... presumably after being fished out of the Atlantic -- dried -- scorched & damaged to give the appearance they had been in a fiery crash -- then planted amongst the Pentagon rubble.. 

           Personal effects identified by family & loved ones as belonging to passengers & crew from Flight 77 recovered from the Pentagon crash site were also planted there --- and again, presumably after being recovered from the ocean depths by Navy Divers who were also complicit in the murder of their fellow Americans. .

            Adding to their tremendous workload, These Black-Ops Navy Divers (probably from SEAL Team X) were tasked with retrieving the corpses & body parts from the sea --- then somehow dry & char them -- and sneak them onto Dover Air Base in Delaware. 

           The photographs of the 5 downed Street Light Poles (along with a schematic detailing the location & positioning of each)  which witnesses saw the Plane's Wings clip & fell before crashing into the Pentagon were again either taken from some other location, or were pulled down by FBI or Black-Ops.... The US did not have any Missile or UAV with a wide enough wingspan to have reached to knock them down as they stood -- though some are vehement that we did.. 

            Included in the alleged Street Light Fakery, is the Photo of DC Cab driver Lloyd England's Taxi pictured on Route 27 in front of the Pentagon ---with the downed Street Light Pole next to his heavily damaged Cab... This was dismissed as Mr. England having driven the car there at the direction of secret government entities, then proceed to jump out and smash his Taxi with a bat, while other co-conspirators pulled down the Street Light, placing it next to the Cab.. And again, not a soul saw this.

            Every single Eyewitness ( most unknown to each other and  including many non-government employees) that saw a Commercial passenger Jet (numerous describing as a 757 or specifically an American Airlines), from differing locations & vantage points, flying low overhead, approaching the Pentagon, and impacting the Wall are Liars seeking fame -- Mistaken -- or complicit in the conspiracy to murder 3000 of their fellow citizens that day .... 
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:24 pm

I think you just proved that you lied....

I think you are a simpleton

who swallows all WASH DC

official narratives.
 

Kobia2 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:32 pm

          Every single photo of Plane debris taken at the Pentagon has been dismissed as having been photographed from some other location --- or those identified as belonging to a Boeing 757 including a Wheel Hub, parts from a Rolls Royce RB211 Turbofan engine, Landing Gear, shredded Aluminum with Yellow Primer used in Aircraft Fuselages having been planted there by the FBI or Black-Ops entities when no one was looking.. 

           

Actually, one of the landing gears photographed have been debated that it was not part of a Boeing 757. The wheel hub at the pentagon pic had 10 bolt divots, where as a Boeing AA 757 wheel hub has only 8. 
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:39 pm

Debated by whom?

Show us

You don't bother answering my questions, yet you insist I answer yours. Go **** yourself. Answer me, and I'll show you. 

I'll wait...Yeah, I didn't think so. 


Prediction:
Here comes her copy/paste about **** witnesses and pics.

         For those who'd like to see what a High Speed / Low Altitude pass by a Boeing 757 looks like, here we go...... 
Now, after watching these short clips --- picture you are in slow moving traffic in your car --- in a control tower --- or looking out an office or hotel window , and this passes less than 200 feet from you..... Are you able to guess that it's an Airplane?

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZXLwmn3CTk

           https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfcLcbkF-hc
 
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm

So...
You claim the landing gear wasn't a 757s

Can you show us where you read that?

As always, Z09 refuses to answer my questions. Unbelievable. Just pure **** cowardice. 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:37 pm

Actually, one of the landing gears photographed have been debated that it was not part of a Boeing 757. The wheel hub at the pentagon pic had 10 bolt divots, where as a Boeing AA 757 wheel hub has only 8.

                 You're wrong......
     This site has probably the best, most in-depth investigation into the Wheel Hub recovered from the Pentagon..... 

         https://aerospaceweb.org/question/consp ... 0290.shtml


        

 
 

Kobia2 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm

         For those who'd like to see what a High Speed / Low Altitude pass by a Boeing 757 looks like, here we go...... 
Now, after watching these short clips --- picture you are in slow moving traffic in your car --- in a control tower --- or looking out an office or hotel window , and this passes less than 200 feet from you..... Are you able to guess that it's an Airplane?

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZXLwmn3CTk

           https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfcLcbkF-hc

wow

should have been easy for all the video cameras to depict this.

Great videos!
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:56 pm

Would it be too much trouble to show us where you read the landing gear wasn't from a 757?

Since it's too much trouble for you to answer my questions, then yes. 

Are you seeing a pattern here, yet? 

Kobia2 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 1:57 pm

                 You're wrong......
     This site has probably the best, most in-depth investigation into the Wheel Hub recovered from the Pentagon..... 

         https://aerospaceweb.org/question/consp ... 0290.shtml


        

 

I said it was debated, I never said I was on board with it. I am just saying there were doubts by some. I still maintain that any of these pics could have been from any plane crash debris anywhere. 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm

Yes...
You said it was "debated"..
...And there's nothing to it...

​​​​@Sumela  @Jantje_Smit  has Z09 answered even one of your questions? Just one. 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 2:41 pm

​​​​@Sumela  @Jantje_Smit  has Z09 answered even one of your questions? Just one.

She mostly just asks questions as an answer to questions.

Like what color is the sky?
She responds..."grey if its raining"
 

Sumela » 15 Aug 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 3:10 pm

She mostly just asks questions as an answer to questions.

Like what color is the sky?
She responds..."is it raining, then its grey"

 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 3:35 pm

Ever find that quote I never made?

 

Of course.  Why would I give you another chance to slither and evade?

I am embarrassed for you.
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 3:35 pm

Ever find that quote I never made?

Ever answer a question? 

Vegas » 15 Aug 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 3:44 pm

Ever answer a question?

Its not surprising for a neocon. 

After all they approve of illegal invasions, wars and occupations.

They approve of training/funding terrorists and Nazis as proxy armies.

With neocons the ends always justify the means.  Remember that filthy **** Madeline Albright on 60 minutes
was asked if it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children....she replied "yes".

So what is a little evasion and deflection on a chat site??
 

Sumela » 15 Aug 2023, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 3:53 pm

Its not surprising for a neocon. 

After all they approve of illegal invasions, wars and occupations.

They approve of training/funding terrorists and Nazis as proxy armies.

With neocons the ends always justify the means.  Remember that filthy **** Madeline Albright on 60 minutes
was asked if it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children....she replied "yes".

So what is a little evasion and deflection on a chat site??

I don't get the point of evading questions. If someone doesn't know the answer, then just simply say "I don't know." It doesn't make you weak or stupid to not know. But she won't answer, she refuses. Therefore, **** her. 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 4:19 pm

I never made the quote you said I did..
We both know it..

If so you'd show it..

But you can't!

Keep begging
 

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 4:19 pm

I never made the quote you said I did..
We both know it..

If so you'd show it..

But you can't!

Have you gotten around to answering any questions? 


Yeah, I didn't think so.   

Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2023, 4:24 pm

So the people on the plane were actually fake people that never existed?

Really never heard about that

Yeah, I didn't think that you would answer me.