This is another point of contention the Inside-Jobbers used to raise when discussing the Landing Gear Wheel Hub recovered at the Pentagon crash site.... There are questions to be asked on both sides of the debate, and you've done a good job raising many of them.

Cannot lie reciting factual truth. Statistical figures lie and liars control living with statistical averages and in space time relativity in 24/7 facts there is an added ,0212962962963 of a second every second added per rotation of the planet that rotates 23:56:56 constantly.
Does the paragraph above answer any of my questions? Yeah, I didn't think so. Therefore, I won't waste my time with it.
Aren't all your questions specifically about governing outcomes arriving tomorrow and how people have to behave today to make those dreams happen next, now.Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ Does the paragraph above answer any of my questions? Yeah, I didn't think so. Therefore, I won't waste my time with it.
https://i.postimg.cc/RFPrDp5F/BBADFCD6- ... -E35-A.gifNostradamus'omh » 16 Aug 2023, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ Aren't all your questions specifically about governing outcomes arriving tomorrow and how people have to behave today to make those dreams happen next, now.
But living is a series parallel exercise of adapting to the current global situation in every geographical area at the same time just different parts of the surface moving by event horizons measuring each cycle of life's time adapting to the moment here equally occupying space "now".
Seems your projections of truth are defined by hindsight and statistical averaging changing interpretation of how living happens to why each ancestor is mutually evolving as ancestrally positioned evolved into total sum of never same results twice,
NOW.
Is that supposed to make me feel like daffy duck for resisting a character saving humanity corrupting everyone alive to where I feel lost in space occupying time naturally displaced as equally adapting to the moment here?Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ https://i.postimg.cc/RFPrDp5F/BBADFCD6- ... -E35-A.gif
@ROG62 sorry for stealing this, but it's too good not to. LOL
Those people didn't see a plane, they said they saw a plane, not exactly the same thing..Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ Wouldn't it be dandy for you to tell us how a jumbo jet can disappear 15 seconds after 100 people saw it?

It would have been flying dangerously low for miles....Jantje_Smit » 16 Aug 2023, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Those people didn't see a plane, they said they saw a plane, not exactly the same thing..
Too bad none of those people took a picture
![]()
Now, after watching those short clips.. picture the cameras on the top of the Pentagon.. and that passed less than 200 feet from them.. are you able to guess why there aren't any pictures?Kobia2 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ For those who'd like to see what a High Speed / Low Altitude pass by a Boeing 757 looks like, here we go......
Now, after watching these short clips --- picture you are in slow moving traffic in your car --- in a control tower --- or looking out an office or hotel window , and this passes less than 200 feet from you..... Are you able to guess that it's an Airplane?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZXLwmn3CTk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfcLcbkF-hc
Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ So tell us...
How could all these people claim they saw a plane and not a single one saw a missile?
If Kobia was kicking our asses he would have a credible explanation why there are no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon... one frame a second.. lol..Rock » 15 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑ It's pretty funny that you're picking on Z09 when it's Kobia who's kicking your *** all over the forum. I notice you have very little response for all of his evidence.


But it wasn't flying low at the same place twice. traveling over 300 mph that dangerously low for miles was last 5 to 10 minutes in the air. That is 5 miles per minute at 300 mph. 6 mpm at 360 mph, 7 mpm at 420, 8 miles per minute at 480.Sumela » 16 Aug 2023, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ It would have been flying dangerously low for miles....
in the DC/Arlington area. And not one photo???
Its completely laughable
Passenger planes slow to 175 miles before landing.Nostradamus'omh » 16 Aug 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ But it wasn't flying low at the same place twice. traveling over 300 mph that dangerously low for miles was last 5 to 10 minutes in the air. That is 5 miles per minute at 300 mph. 6 mpm at 360 mph, 7 mpm at 420, 8 miles per minute at 480.
Your mind has no sense of proportion to space time distance of kinetic actions and reactions going on spontaneously simultaneously. Series parallel time displacement. Everything of substance is evolving at the same time while specifically existing as one thing or another.
All your mind does is compare how people choose to believe now isn't eternity and it always has been. Every intellectual franchise of humanity did or does it forward with the ancestors currently living historically or current events.
The plane was flown by persons not intended on landing safely. You are avoiding the actual scenario using proper procedures at an airport or emergency landing. Those piloting made the plane a guided missile.Sumela » 16 Aug 2023, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ Passenger planes slow to 175 miles before landing.
100s of cameras in the area.....lol. Not one pic.
Now shut yer *** up retard
I have no answer to as why there's no pic of the plane hitting the Pentagon. I also have no doubt that a plane did hit it. There's tons more evidence that that happened than that a missile hit it. There's zero evidence that that happened. Only conspiracy theories spewed by the same people who think the earth is flat, man never walked on the moon, or that birds aren't real.Jantje_Smit » 16 Aug 2023, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ If Kobia was kicking our asses he would have a credible explanation why there are no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon... one frame a second.. lol..
I notice you don't have an answer for that either..
Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ I have no answer to as why there's no pic of the plane hitting the Pentagon. I also have no doubt that a plane did hit it. There's tons more evidence that that happened than that a missile hit it. There's zero evidence that that happened. Only conspiracy theories spewed by the same people who think the earth is flat, man never walked on the moon, or that birds aren't real.
Fabricated evidence is not evidence.Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ I have no answer to as why there's no pic of the plane hitting the Pentagon. I also have no doubt that a plane did hit it. There's tons more evidence that that happened than that a missile hit it. There's zero evidence that that happened. Only conspiracy theories spewed by the same people who think the earth is flat, man never walked on the moon, or that birds aren't real.