It would have been flying dangerously low for miles....Jantje_Smit » 16 Aug 2023, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Those people didn't see a plane, they said they saw a plane, not exactly the same thing..
Too bad none of those people took a picture
![]()
Now, after watching those short clips.. picture the cameras on the top of the Pentagon.. and that passed less than 200 feet from them.. are you able to guess why there aren't any pictures?Kobia2 » 15 Aug 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ For those who'd like to see what a High Speed / Low Altitude pass by a Boeing 757 looks like, here we go......
Now, after watching these short clips --- picture you are in slow moving traffic in your car --- in a control tower --- or looking out an office or hotel window , and this passes less than 200 feet from you..... Are you able to guess that it's an Airplane?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZXLwmn3CTk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfcLcbkF-hc
Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ So tell us...
How could all these people claim they saw a plane and not a single one saw a missile?
If Kobia was kicking our asses he would have a credible explanation why there are no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon... one frame a second.. lol..Rock » 15 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑ It's pretty funny that you're picking on Z09 when it's Kobia who's kicking your *** all over the forum. I notice you have very little response for all of his evidence.
But it wasn't flying low at the same place twice. traveling over 300 mph that dangerously low for miles was last 5 to 10 minutes in the air. That is 5 miles per minute at 300 mph. 6 mpm at 360 mph, 7 mpm at 420, 8 miles per minute at 480.Sumela » 16 Aug 2023, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ It would have been flying dangerously low for miles....
in the DC/Arlington area. And not one photo???
Its completely laughable
Passenger planes slow to 175 miles before landing.Nostradamus'omh » 16 Aug 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ But it wasn't flying low at the same place twice. traveling over 300 mph that dangerously low for miles was last 5 to 10 minutes in the air. That is 5 miles per minute at 300 mph. 6 mpm at 360 mph, 7 mpm at 420, 8 miles per minute at 480.
Your mind has no sense of proportion to space time distance of kinetic actions and reactions going on spontaneously simultaneously. Series parallel time displacement. Everything of substance is evolving at the same time while specifically existing as one thing or another.
All your mind does is compare how people choose to believe now isn't eternity and it always has been. Every intellectual franchise of humanity did or does it forward with the ancestors currently living historically or current events.
The plane was flown by persons not intended on landing safely. You are avoiding the actual scenario using proper procedures at an airport or emergency landing. Those piloting made the plane a guided missile.Sumela » 16 Aug 2023, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ Passenger planes slow to 175 miles before landing.
100s of cameras in the area.....lol. Not one pic.
Now shut yer *** up retard
I have no answer to as why there's no pic of the plane hitting the Pentagon. I also have no doubt that a plane did hit it. There's tons more evidence that that happened than that a missile hit it. There's zero evidence that that happened. Only conspiracy theories spewed by the same people who think the earth is flat, man never walked on the moon, or that birds aren't real.Jantje_Smit » 16 Aug 2023, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ If Kobia was kicking our asses he would have a credible explanation why there are no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon... one frame a second.. lol..
I notice you don't have an answer for that either..
Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ I have no answer to as why there's no pic of the plane hitting the Pentagon. I also have no doubt that a plane did hit it. There's tons more evidence that that happened than that a missile hit it. There's zero evidence that that happened. Only conspiracy theories spewed by the same people who think the earth is flat, man never walked on the moon, or that birds aren't real.
Fabricated evidence is not evidence.Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ I have no answer to as why there's no pic of the plane hitting the Pentagon. I also have no doubt that a plane did hit it. There's tons more evidence that that happened than that a missile hit it. There's zero evidence that that happened. Only conspiracy theories spewed by the same people who think the earth is flat, man never walked on the moon, or that birds aren't real.
Mrkelly » 16 Aug 2023, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑I didn't know that this was a thing
satire at its best
https://youtu.be/zNtr0RahRqM
Correct. Its a mystery.
You finally make a statement that we understand and it turns out to be idiotic.
Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ You claim the people on the plane never existed in the first place...
That's just bizarre
Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ You finally make a statement that we understand and it turns out to be idiotic.![]()
Prove it's fabricated.
Sumela » 16 Aug 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ The same left/right folks here that rarely question the govt on anything
....also dont support Assange or Snowden. They hate truth tellers. They prefer MSM pablum.
NORMIES (left/right) have lots in common.
Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ How can 54 people leave for the airport that day and you claim they never existed?
Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ **** off, Rock. You won't answer my questions any more than Z09. That in itself speaks volumes about your own certainty of things.
That also makes you a moron.