Liberal Forum

Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:17 pm

Aww did I hurt your wittle feelings snowflake. The only question you've ever asked is where's the plane. I said it was in the building and that Kobia showed picks of it in the building. Is that not an answer? Jantje asked why no cameras captured the plane crashing into the building. I said I don't know why. Is that not an answer?

  No coward. You can't handle a little opposition to your views. That's your issue. Where are the pics of the plane hitting the building from any one of the 80 cameras from the pentagon...especially the one right above the crash? Kobia's pics were pics of plane pieces. None of them showed to be from the pentagon. Try again. 

Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 11:52 am

How can 54 people leave for the airport that day and you claim they never existed?

Stop playing his game, and start evolving in your own time.

Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:20 pm

  No coward. You can't handle a little opposition to your views. That's your issue. Where are the pics of the plane hitting the building from any one of the 80 cameras from the pentagon...especially the one right above the crash? Kobia's pics were pics of plane pieces. None of them showed to be from the pentagon. Try again.
 

Do you have reading issues?

 Aww did I hurt your wittle feelings snowflake. The only question you've ever asked is where's the plane. I said it was in the building and that Kobia showed picks of it in the building. Is that not an answer? Jantje asked why no cameras captured the plane crashing into the building. I said I don't know why. Is that not an answer?

 

Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:29 pm

Do you have reading issues?

    So, you don't know why. Therefore, you admit that you are talking out of your ***. Okay , got it. 

Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:33 pm

Rock...
Vegas stated the 54 passengers never existed in the first place...

Can you ask him if they didn't exist how come their neighbors spoke so highly of them?

Are the neighbors in the plot too?

You don't answer my questions, thus I don't answer yours. Fair is fair. 

Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:29 pm

Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:20 pm

  No coward. You can't handle a little opposition to your views. That's your issue. Where are the pics of the plane hitting the building from any one of the 80 cameras from the pentagon...especially the one right above the crash? Kobia's pics were pics of plane pieces. None of them showed to be from the pentagon. Try again.
 

Do you have reading issues?

 Aww did I hurt your wittle feelings snowflake. The only question you've ever asked is where's the plane. I said it was in the building and that Kobia showed picks of it in the building. Is that not an answer? Jantje asked why no cameras captured the plane crashing into the building. I said I don't know why. Is that not an answer?

 

Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm

Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:29 pm

Do you have reading issues?

:rofl:   :rofl:  So, you don't know why. Therefore, you admit that you are talking out of your ***. Okay , got it. 

You both have navigating issues limited to evolving one at a time in series parallel space both ancestrally adapting to genetics eternally separating everyone apart as displaced now.

Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm

    So, you don't know why. Therefore, you admit that you are talking out of your ***. Okay , got it.

I said I don't know why cameras didn't capture it. How is that not an answer? I also don't know why the sky is blue. Does that mean it isn't? 

I do believe, however, a plane crashed into the Pentagon based on the evidence presented which far out weighs the zero evidence that a missile hit it.

Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:35 pm

You don't answer my questions, thus I don't answer yours. Fair is fair.

Okay. I'll ask for her since I answered your questions. Do you believe the 54 passengers never really existed?
 

Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm

Okay. I'll ask for her since I answered your questions. Do you believe the 54 passengers never really existed?

I am leaning more to the idea that yes, they existed. I know I said no earlier, but I was being rash. It would make a lot more sense if their plane was shot down over the ocean. A missile is far more believable than a 757 being flown by an amateur with barely any flight hours and could hit a ground target with such precision. The towers are easy targets. A building on the ground level? No way. 

Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 1:10 pm

You're leaning to the idea that the people existed?

You don't answer my questions, thus I don't answer yours. Fair is fair. 

Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 1:17 pm

I think finding some dead bodies might be a sign the people existed....

Just a thought

You don't answer my questions, thus I don't answer yours. Fair is fair. 

Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 12:59 pm

I am leaning more to the idea that yes, they existed. I know I said no earlier, but I was being rash. It would make a lot more sense if their plane was shot down over the ocean. A missile is far more believable than a 757 being flown by an amateur with barely any flight hours and could hit a ground target with such precision. The towers are easy targets. A building on the ground level? No way.

Okay. Now that’s an answer. It’s ****. But at least it’s an answer.
 

Rock » 16 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm

Okay. Now that’s an answer. It’s ****. But at least it’s an answer.

I always answer questions directly from people who answer my questions. I don't answer questions from those who run from mine. Why should I? 

Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 3:08 pm

As interesting it is to discuss one of the biggest crimes in history, as soon as he said the passengers weren't even real I realized I was debating someone that's way out there....

are YOU alright? 80 PAGES SO FAR? ???? 
 

sootedupCyndi » 16 Aug 2023, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 3:18 pm

are YOU alright? 80 PAGES SO FAR? ????

No, she isn't. She has attention whored this whole thread. Over 1600 comments and probably 85% of those are hers saying the same **** and running from my questions. 

Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 3:47 pm

Wanna bet?

This is on you .

   I am not going to count, but if you have that much time on your hands, go for it. I am just estimating . It sure seems like 85% is you. 

Z09 » 16 Aug 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 3:47 pm

I'm fine...
Perhaps you should ask Vegas...

ok? What ever you say- 83 pages non stop doesn't look normal to me- but hey- have fun.     

 

sootedupCyndi » 16 Aug 2023, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 3:59 pm

ok? What ever you say- 83 pages non stop doesn't look normal to me- but hey- have fun.   

I am actually good if Deezer locks it. We have all been at a stalemate since 70 pages ago.   

Kobia has been awesome. He has answered every one of my questions. Though, I believe his evidence is testimonial, incomplete, and solely based on the 9/11 commission report narrative, which was fed to all of us, I do believe he made great points. Especially, the lamp posts. 

Z09...well, what can I say?      Between hiding behind questions, refusing to answer mine, and copy/pasting the same redundant ****, I felt like I was talking to BlackVegtable again. 

Vegas » 16 Aug 2023, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 4:06 pm

I am actually good if Deezer locks it. We have all been at a stalemate since 70 pages ago.   

Kobia has been awesome. He has answered every one of my questions. Though, I believe his evidence is testimonial, incomplete, and solely based on the 9/11 commission report narrative, which was fed to all of us, I do believe he made great points. Especially, the lamp posts. 

Z09...well, what can I say?      Between hiding behind questions, refusing to answer mine, and copy/pasting the same redundant ****, I felt like I was talking to BlackVegtable again.

Kobia was pretty good.   
 

Jantje_Smit » 16 Aug 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2023, 9:57 am

Now, after watching those short clips.. picture the cameras on the top of the Pentagon.. and that passed less than 200 feet from them.. are you able to guess why there aren't any pictures?

Sorry, I couldn't resist that one

                I have no idea, if you do please explain..... I have no idea what direction they were pointed at, and what they were to surveile, do you?..  I have no idea if it was a motion sensor High-Speed camera system, designed to capture Jets traveling 550 MPH at the building or not do you? --- I've heard you state YOU believe they did, so present you proof... Below is the Link to my source regarding the 85 Cameras at the Pentagon (and the 1 taken from the Gas station across the highway, their positioning, and capabilities 

http://www.9-11tv.org/the-pentagon-plan ... ce-cameras

                From the Site:                    

• Most of the video cameras were not aimed in the direction of the Pentagon and/or at the part of the Pentagon in question – the impact zone.
• Most cameras and recorders were located a considerable distance from the impact event, and virtually all surveillance cameras had wide-angle (fisheye) lenses which render distant objects at very low resolution, and which cause some geometric distortion to the image.
• Many cameras had obstructed views of the Pentagon impact area.
• In 2001, virtually all surveillance cameras rendered low spacial resolution images of at best 480i, and more often less.  480i is what is now called SD – Standard Definition.
• In 2001, most surveillance cameras recorded video at low frame rates (low temporal resolution), often in the range of 1 to 8 frames per second.  By comparison, US TV is most often recorded at 30 frames/second.
• The high speed of the plane, which was accelerating to over 550 mph, resulted in image blurring in the video recording, and offered a low chance of catching more than a single frame of the plane, given the low-recorded frame rate (low temporal resolution) of 1 frame/second).

                                  
                What I do know is if such clear, high resolution pictures or video footage of American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon existed and had been released to the public, it would have been denied or dismissed by the Inside-Jobbers / Conspiracy Theorists just like every other single piece of evidence has been... Here's what we most likely would be hearing from your side of the fence on this thread:

A. Still Photos of an American Airlines Boeing 757 had been superimposed over a Missile as it struck the Pentagon.
B. Video Footage had been manipulated to edit out the Missile, and insert that of a 757 which was had been filmed flying over some other location, to make it appear it had been a Plane hitting the Pentagon, and not a Missile. .
C. The Cameras which took these PIctures & Video were never at the Pentagon --- and if they were, it was only because they had been planted there  after the attack.
D. The Security Camera Hard Drives were swapped out by Black-Ops personnel minutes after the attack, and replaced with ones containing the Fake footage of Flight 77 hitting the the Pentagon instead of the Missile on 9/11.
E. The photographic & Security Camera footage does not show a real  Airplane.. It is in fact a Toy replica, and under extreme magnification you can see "Mattel" stamped above the AA Logo on the Tail.