golfboy » 18 Aug 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, of course. I guess the pictures of the debris AT the Pentagon, was all photoshopped.
And none of the pictures you showed, were shown to be at the locations claimed.
See how that works?
Z09 » 19 Aug 2023, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Cruise missiles from 1000 miles away?
Could have came from anywhere??
How about some examples??
I just gave you some examples..Z09 » 19 Aug 2023, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Cruise missiles from 1000 miles away?
Could have came from anywhere??
How about some examples??
..it could be 10 miles, a 100 miles, 200 miles..
Z09 » 19 Aug 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ Passengers that you claim never even existed..
Yeah..
That's real plausible
Still running from my questions ^^^
Let's go through this again ......Jantje_Smit » 19 Aug 2023, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, we can agree on that, of course I could have picked a picture that showed a much more damaged engine... but still, compare those pics you posted with this one...
Don't tell me you can't see the difference..
I did come up with a very plausible & credible explanation / possibility regarding the lack of additional & better image photos of Flight 77 impacting the Pentagon that day.... I also stated I had several such sources which pretty much offered the same explanation as to why those Security Cameras might not have been positioned, nor had the capabilities to capture the photos you think they ought to have... It doesn't support your belief that Americans Fired a Missile at the Pentagon, and murdered other Americans that day so you "don't give a ****" lol... You've offered nothing to support your assertions other than your own notion the state of the art expensive Security Camera System, which I too am certain they had should have provided such images... You have no idea what those Cameras were designed to film or photograph... I'm sure they were the best, and most expensive available --- to meet their intended specific security requirements.. Like you said, and I agree -- no expense would have been spared... So if there had been a perceived need (and it turned out there should have been) to capture incoming projectiles at high rates of speed, they would have installed such a system in addition to the Wall Mounted Security Cameras in place.. Something like a predecessor of the NAVY's Air & Missile Defense Radar (AMDR)Jantje_Smit » 19 Aug 2023, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not demanding clear pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon, I'm simply pointing out that there obviously should be pictures and you can't come up with a credible explanation why there aren't any to be found.. and don't act like zo9 and twist my words, of course they weren't the same cameras as on spy planes/ satellites, I only said that if they had those, the surveillance cameras on the Pentagon would be state of the art, not some cheap version with one frame a second.. I don't give a **** what you 'fact' checking site says, that's simply common sense... they have black budgets of $billions, do you really think the guys with the stars on their shoulders would have anything less than the best for their own protection...
And you can clearly see the cameras in the enlarged sections, if there weren't any cameras there I'm pretty sure you could find a source that said it's a lie.. lol..it's the Pentagon, no way they would leave any blind spots, every side of the building is watched 24/7, and no way they could have missed something as big as a boeing 757...
![]()
If that is your "official thread owner's request", I will do so.Vegas » 19 Aug 2023, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ Well...I think this thread should be locked. I mean, @Jantje_Smit and I won, the rest lost.
How so? Because Kobia, though he answers questions and made good points, pretty much just regurgitated the same narrative that we were already fed. He didn't really offer any new insight to anything. The conversation can be summed up as follows:
1. Kobia: Pics of plane debris.
Rebuttal: None of the pics were shown to be at the pentagon, they were just pieces of a crash that could have been from any plane crash somewhere.
2. Kobia: Experts, forensic professionals, and the FBI identified the remains of all the passengers.
Rebuttal: Sadly scientists lie and sell out. Proof? 97% of scientist sold out on the climate change hoax, and of course, let's not forget all the medical doctors and researchers about the Covid hoax. Therefore, yes. It is very possible to get scientists to sell out. And the FBI? Yeah, they would never lie about anything, they have always been proven to be honest.![]()
Z09:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What can be said about that narcissistic bimbo? She refused to answer every single question. Literally, every single question we asked.
Jantje and I: 80 cameras at the pentagon. All confiscated except one with a useless image that nobody can make out. Even 1 camera is a thousand times a better witnesses than 1000 human witnesses. Let alone 80 of them. Why were they confiscated? No answer.
Let's not forget the obvious one...there was no **** plane there.
Since we are the clear winners, and neither Kobia nor Z09, and anyone else, can adequately address the above two points, I make a motion for @Deezer Shoove or @Cannonpointer to lock this thread. It's obvious there will be no new perspectives. Just the same narrative over and over.
Alrighty, then. Jantje and Vegas win - thread locked.Vegas » 19 Aug 2023, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ Well...I think this thread should be locked. I mean, @Jantje_Smit and I won, the rest lost.
How so? Because Kobia, though he answers questions and made good points, pretty much just regurgitated the same narrative that we were already fed. He didn't really offer any new insight to anything. The conversation can be summed up as follows:
1. Kobia: Pics of plane debris.
Rebuttal: None of the pics were shown to be at the pentagon, they were just pieces of a crash that could have been from any plane crash somewhere.
2. Kobia: Experts, forensic professionals, and the FBI identified the remains of all the passengers.
Rebuttal: Sadly scientists lie and sell out. Proof? 97% of scientist sold out on the climate change hoax, and of course, let's not forget all the medical doctors and researchers about the Covid hoax. Therefore, yes. It is very possible to get scientists to sell out. And the FBI? Yeah, they would never lie about anything, they have always been proven to be honest.![]()
Z09:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What can be said about that narcissistic bimbo? She refused to answer every single question. Literally, every single question we asked.
Jantje and I: 80 cameras at the pentagon. All confiscated except one with a useless image that nobody can make out. Even 1 camera is a thousand times a better witnesses than 1000 human witnesses. Let alone 80 of them. Why were they confiscated? No answer.
Let's not forget the obvious one...there was no **** plane there.
Since we are the clear winners, and neither Kobia nor Z09, and anyone else, can adequately address the above two points, I make a motion for @Deezer Shoove or @Cannonpointer to lock this thread. It's obvious there will be no new perspectives. Just the same narrative over and over.