Liberal Forum

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 12:34 pm

That's NOT 3 feet Harvard

From your link lil feller 

”In the real footage, after McIntyre mentions the “huge, gaping hole,” he continues: “I can see parts of the airplane that crashed into the building — very small pieces of the plane — on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw was about three-feet long”
 

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 2:47 pm

Hey Harvard.....
what happened to the plane ???

What plane?
 

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 3:01 pm

The plane that YOU claim never crashed into the Pentagon...

It must be somewhere??

How would I know where it went?

I was talking about where it wasn't 
 

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm

Just thought maybe you'd know ...

why would I know?

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 5:50 pm

You say that missile was fired at the Pentagon.......And there was never a plane crash..

Since you're this **** gullible I just suspected you might have an idea where the original plane went and how dead bodies with DNA were recovered from the crash site and identified...
...Unless of course if all the doctors lied too...

where did I say that a missile was fired at the pentagon?

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 5:56 pm

Ok...
So what hit the Pentagon?

You jumped in when another said it was a missile...
You posted there were no plane parts...

So..
You tell us

Was I there?
 

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 6:08 pm

What a waste!

You say a plane didn't hit the Pentagon but have nothing else to add?

Nope ... old news
 

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 6:21 pm

So a plane didn't crash into the Pentagon....???

But you have nothing else to add?

He's only got a 12 word vocabulary, check out his post history.

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 6:21 pm

So a plane didn't crash into the Pentagon....???

But you have nothing else to add?

If this old news is new to you

I really feel sorry for you 

I'm not interested in having a conversation two decades old

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 7:00 pm

Then why did you jump in???

boredom 

Mrkelly » 23 Jul 2023, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 7:00 pm

boredom

 
 

Z09 » 23 Jul 2023, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2023, 11:05 am

Remote controlled 727?

I already posted the evidence, watch that, from 36:00..

The planes were hijacked and there's footage of terrorists getting on the plane...

lol.. there is footage of what you are told are terrorists getting on the plane.. another fun fact, some of those 19 hijackers turned out to be alive and well later..

And now you think a cruise missile hit the Pentagon...
And somehow that was undetected?
And that was covered up?

Nah, I already thought that 20 years ago..

And if know plane hit the Pentagon where did the plane go?

Another who the **** cares, the deep state is good at making things disappear, maybe they dumped it in the ocean, maybe it went to area 51..

"Gee..I don't know"  doesn't help your argument...

Just asking stoopid questions doesn't help your argument.. not that you have one.. how about you answering a simple question for a change.. where are the **** pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon?????


 
https://youtu.be/n_fp5kaVYhk

Z09 » 24 Jul 2023, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2023, 5:20 am

So now you're saying that there wasn't a plane that crashed into the Pentagon and the plan was diverted to Area 51?

Do YOU have footage?

Are you familiar with the concept of irony?

And the terrorists on those planes that day are still alive?
Got a link?

Thanks!

I had plenty of links but I lost them a few computers ago, maybe I could google that one again but I'm not going to bother until you answer some questions in return... the most important one... where are the **** pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon?????


 
 
 
 
 

Z09 » 24 Jul 2023, 5:30 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2023, 5:30 am

Another point...
They removed dead bodies from the crash site and identified them as passengers on the plane.

Who is "they"?

And yes, the next question would be if there are any pictures of the 'removing'

 

 
 

Z09 » 24 Jul 2023, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2023, 6:16 am

And you say it was a missile?
Where's the video?
Where was it shot from? 

Damn.. lol... I guess that answers the question..

I know you don't realize it but the only thing you do is prove me right..


 
https://youtu.be/0SL2PzzOiF8
 

Z09 » 24 Jul 2023, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2023, 6:16 am

Your complaint is there's not a clear video of the plane hitting the building....
But the evidence is overwhelming that...

Planes were hijacked
Planes were flown into buildings
Bodies were recovered that matched passenger lists...
And these people have never been heard from again

And you say it was a missile?
Where's the video?
Where was it shot from?
Where did the plane go and what happened to the crew and passengers?
Why did everyone lie about bodies and plane wreckage?

And how did they keep all these people quiet over the last 20 years?

Not to mention the plane did not turn off its transponder.  Thousands of faa controllers watched the plane make it's way to the pentagon. A cruise missile at some point in the flight replaced the 747 and the 747 turned its transponder off? Plane was landed elsewhere in secret, all aboard murdered? Not plausible. 
 

Pilots for 9/11 Truth - United airline pilot forums

Aviators Pilots for 9/11 Truth is a non-profit organization created in 2006 by a small group of pilots whose goal is to conduct an independent investigation of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in New York City. The organization believes that the official version of events presented by the US government and media contains contradictions and does not correspond to reality. Aviators of Pilots for 9/11 Truth claim to have evidence that the planes involved in the disaster could have been remotely controlled, not just by the terrorist pilots. The organization conducts its own research and analysis, including studying flight recorder data, and seeks to draw public and government attention to its theses.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day based on solid data and facts -- since 9/11/2001 is the catalyst for many of the events shaping our world today -- and the United States Government does not seem to be very forthcoming with answers or facts.

We do not accept the 9/11 Commission Report -- a Commission admittedly "set up to fail" according to the Chairman himself, nor "hypothesis" as a satisfactory explanation for the continued gross violation(s) of the United States Constitution being committed by Government agencies, and the sacrifice every American has made and continue to make -- some more than others.

We stand with the numerous other growing organizations of Firefighters, Medical Professionals, Lawyers, Scholars, Military Officers, Veterans, Religious and Political Leaders, along side Survivors, family members of the victims -- family members of soldiers who have made the ultimate sacrifice -- including the many Ground Zero workers who are now ill or have passed away, when we ask for a true, new independent investigation into the events of 9/11.

https://pilotsfor911truth.org/
 

Neo » 24 Jul 2023, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2023, 7:05 am

Not to mention the plane did not turn off its transponder.  Thousands of faa controllers watched the plane make it's way to the pentagon. A cruise missile at some point in the flight replaced the 747 and the 747 turned its transponder off? Plane was landed elsewhere in secret, all aboard murdered? Not plausible.
 

They didn't watch the plane make it's way to the Pentagon, they watched a transponder signal on their screen make it's way to the Pentagon.. you don't think it's plausible to fake that but you think it's plausible that there are no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon, not to mention the wreckage, it's probably the most surveillanced building in the world ffs, hundreds of cameras everywhere.. doesn't that make you wonder even a tiny bit?

 
 

Z09 » 24 Jul 2023, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2023, 7:36 am

Then suppose you answer all the other questions...

Where did the plane go?
Where did this missile come from?

You can't fly a small plane around DC without being stopped and suddenly a cruise missile comes from where?

And  how can all these people be lying?

I already answered your questions, then why can't I suppose that you should answer a resonable question from me first?

You claim a plane hit the Pentagon, how hard can it be to prove that... oh, another one of those funny things I forgot about.. now why would the FBI need to confiscate that footage.. maybe because there was something on it that they wouldn't want people to see... like a clear picture of a cruise missile..

 

The FBI's speedy retrieval of the tapes is corroborated by several witnesses, among them Jose Velasquez, a gas-station supervisor whose security cameras allegedly recorded the moment of impact when Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. "Within minutes, the FBI was there and took the film," Velasquez told the "Richmond Times Dispatch." In addition, according to Gertz and Scarborough's "Inside the Ring," a hotel near the Pentagon may have captured footage on its security camera. This footage was seized by the FBI, who said the tapes didn't record the attack.

https://classroom.synonym.com/were-9-11 ... businesses
 
 

Jantje_Smit » 24 Jul 2023, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jul 2023, 7:34 am

They didn't watch the plane make it's way to the Pentagon, they watched a transponder signal on their screen make it's way to the Pentagon.. you don't think it's plausible to fake that but you think it's plausible that there are no pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon, not to mention the wreckage, it's probably the most surveillanced building in the world ffs, hundreds of cameras everywhere.. doesn't that make you wonder even a tiny bit?

Correct, they watched the transponder signal take off from the airport, fly towards its destination, change course, and hit the pentagon. Thousands witnessed this in real time. Tens of thousands of aviation experts watched it on computer forensic replay. 

Yes a cruise missile with a transponder could do the same. At what point was the plane seamlessly swapped with a missile?