WTC7 fell in full free fall...like a demolition. Not hit by a plane.Neo » 22 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑ OK Alex Jones, were the passengers that called home crisis actors? Were the pilots and air traffic control involved in the plot? Occums Razor, simplest answer is generally the correct answer.
In the history of true modern steel and glass buildings, until 9-11 none had suffered such intense fires.Sumela » 22 Jul 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Im not saying I know what happened.
BUT it looks exactly like a demolition of a building. Perfect free fall. From just fire?
It was a fire like 1000s of other fires....Bruce » 22 Jul 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ In the history of true modern steel and glass buildings, until 9-11 none had suffered such intense fires.
You can comprise steel using your kitchen stove burners. It really does not require all that much heat to get steel girders up over a thousand degrees or so, and after a period they’ll snap.
When one snaps, they all snap, and the building pan cakes straight down.
I get so tired of these **** people that pick a party to blame as if they know special information.Vegas » 22 Jul 2023, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Watch. He will blame the GOP. He always blames the GOP for everything...and I mean everything.
You saw WTC 7 fallSumela » 22 Jul 2023, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ It was a fire like 1000s of other fires....
wtc7 was not hit with a plane with jet fuel
sorry Sparky, you **** yer pants again
blah blah blah...CUCKBruce » 22 Jul 2023, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑ You saw WTC 7 fall
Five hours of raging fires compromised the steel.
Those fires started in WTC 7 because it was so close the the Twin Towers.
Until I understood that modern steel and glass buildings will pan cake straight down when any structural beam snaps, I agree that looked like a controlled demolition,
For proof, look at WTC 7. Rudy Guallni had to be evacuated. It was only heat, that took it down.
Catastrophic structure failure from a fire that burned for 8 hours. Buildings will fall into their own footprint unless there is resistance strong enough to resist gravity.Sumela » 22 Jul 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ WTC7 fell in full free fall...like a demolition. Not hit by a plane.
The Project For a New American Century wrote months before 911 (PFANAC a neocon ***)
""we need a new Pearl Harbor moment""
So, according to Ocuums Razor...seems at least plausible
Actually its highly unusual for that to happen.Neo » 22 Jul 2023, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Catastrophic structure failure from a fire that burned for 8 hours. Buildings will fall into their own footprint unless there is resistance strong enough to resist gravity.
So, your theory is that American Airlines Boeing 757 Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon?.... Is it your theory that this Plane magically vanished instead of crashing into the Pentagon --- or that the Plane, it's Passengers & Crew simply never existed?... In either case can you explain how all but 4 of the charred sets of remains and body parts inside the Pentagon from Flight 77 were identified as the Passengers & Crew through DNA by samples provided from the victims families?.... The bodies of the 4 Hijackers were determined by process of elimination since no DNA samples were collected from their Family members.. I would be interested to hear your "theory" on this --- as I imagine so might some of the family members of those on Flight 77..Vegas » 22 Jul 2023, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is my theory:
Planes have had autopilot technology for decades. Plug in the directional coordinates and a pilot literally doesn't even have to fly the plane. They just sit there and make sure all is good. Therefore, it is more plausible that there were no 19 rag headed hijackers. The planes were pre-programmed without the pilot's knowledge. The system was over-rid. Communication to the control tower was also cut off. The planes were locked on autopilot with the twin tower coordinates and wherever the third plane was supposed to go. Maybe the pilots heard what was happening and found a way to crash it. There was no fourth plane, that was a missile that hit the pentagon.
The twin towers falling was a demolition, as well as the other building that wasn't even hit.
For a building to topple it needs lateral force. Something like an earthquake or tsunami or a load bearing wall to remain standing.
'''''we need a new Pearl Harbor moment'''' sorry, its simply curiousNeo » 22 Jul 2023, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ For a building to topple it needs lateral force. Something like an earthquake or tsunami or a load bearing wall to remain standing.
Unless I’m mistaken it’s never happened except on 9-11.
Its simply odd that wtc7, not hit by a plane, fell in complete perfect free fall.....from just fire. Its curiousKobia2 » 22 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Can any of the 9/11 Inside Job 'Theorists" explain how a Building that had people & security personnel working in it 24/7 would not notice the Demo Crew and machinery required for the massive undertaking of preparing those Buildings for a controlled Implosion ---- which would have included a roaring symphony of Saws, Jackhammers, etc to remove walls to access and weaken the Building's Support Columns?...
awwww lil guy,Bruce » 22 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Unless I’m mistaken it’s never happened except on 9-11.
Here’s why.
Huge steel and glass towers are only put up in dense metro areas where there are incredible fire departments.
Are there fires in the towers?
Probably very common. Here comes the fire department and puts out the fire.
But only on 9-11, there’s two jet liners almost full of fuel hit two huge towers way high up, the fires implode both, then all the twin towers become huge bon fires which feed WTC 7 until it becomes an inferno, and it pan cakes.
The worst sneak attack since Pearl Harbor overwhelmed the fire fighters.
I don’t know that’s ever happened before or since 9-11
The inferno was at the bottom of WTC-7
now is that the third building? There was a third one right?