Sure, this should be good...

Staged events again. Species eliminating itself from the inside out to save intellectual realities from discovering how actual evolving has always evolved in the moment here.Sumela » 25 Jul 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I posted "why" about 20 times.
"""we need a new Pearl Harbor moment'''' LOL, the **** put it in writing in 2000.
911 has made $$$$TRILLIONS for the War Complex. Whoever, however....we know who profited BIGLY.
Tssk, Tssk...Z09 » 26 Jul 2023, 5:00 am » wrote: ↑ You stated the plane could have been dumped in the ocean or taken to Area 51...
It's in the above post
You not only do irony, you also don't do sarcasm..
Now that you lost the bet I think you should get with the program and answer the question.. and please don't ask which one..Another who the **** cares, the deep state is good at making things disappear, maybe they dumped it in the ocean, maybe it went to area 51..

It's a cool tale to tell the children but I'm curious, how does that work, do they have streetlights in the Pentagon?Z09 » 26 Jul 2023, 5:12 am » wrote: ↑ Probst, Frank
Frank Probst . . . [a] Pentagon renovation worker and retired Army officer . . . was inspecting newly installed telecommunications wiring inside the five-story, 6.5-million-square-foot building.
On either side of him, three streetlights had been sheared in half by the airliner's wings at 12 to 15 feet above the ground. An engine had clipped the antenna off a Jeep Grand Cherokee stalled in traffic not far away.

Yes, that's what I said..Z09 » 26 Jul 2023, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑ You stated the plane could have been taken to Area 51?
Yes or no?????
Everyone also sees that's not what the bet was about...Everyone see's it...

Jantje is a disciple of reasonable doubt. All he does is prevent other people from looking at life from instinctive perception of evolving simultaneously here one of a kind.Z09 » 26 Jul 2023, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ There's 87 witnesses that told what they saw that day...
And you say they're all lying?
So...
You say a missile hit the building and the FBI agents were phony...
Tell us..
What happened to the American Airlines plane that dozens and dozens of people said flew over their cars and crashed into the Pentagon?
Your question was answered, I avoided nothing...... I have a few questions of my own if you'd like to take a stab at answering...Jantje_Smit » 26 Jul 2023, 2:10 am » wrote: ↑ I already told you that it's impossible for a boeing 727 to fly at 550 mph at ground level.. and security cameras at the Pentagon with 1 frame a second.. lol.. they couldn't even capture a speeding car then.. and why did it take 5 years and a freedom of information suit to release those videos.. but that doesn't negate this very simple question.. why do you keep avoiding it?
Nah, most of them are probably convinced they are telling the truth... they saw something hit the Pentagon, the headlines scream it was terrorists hijacking planes so that must have been what they saw, they embellished their story and told the media so they could get their 15 minutes of fame..Z09 » 26 Jul 2023, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ There's 87 witnesses that told what they saw that day...
And you say they're all lying?
Yes, the FBI agents that confiscated the tapes were there 5 minutes afterwards, they knew it was going to happen..So...
You say a missile hit the building and the FBI agents were phony...
lol.. I already told you..Tell us..
What happened to the American Airlines plane that dozens and dozens of people said flew over their cars and crashed into the Pentagon?
Another who the **** cares, the deep state is good at making things disappear, maybe they dumped it in the ocean, maybe it went to area 51..

Oh yes, you did, you clearly avoid answering this question...

But since you took the effort of typing all that I will take a swab...Kobia2 » 26 Jul 2023, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ ...... I have a few questions of my own if you'd like to take a stab at answering...
I'm not going to bother with that once since it doesn't matter if the plane (that didn't hit the Pentagon) went 300mph or 500mph, I call it **** that some terrorist from a cave in Afghanistan could pull it off after spending a few hours on a simulator though..1. You are probably basing the false notion that it was impossible for a 757 to fly at 550 mph at that low altitude on what the conspiracy theorists and naysayers refer to as "Ground Effect"..... And it's simply incorrect. There are numerous sources which dispel this and prove otherwise... Below is one source that does such, and I've posted some of the excerpts... It is technical and lengthy, but does explain both how the plane flew at such speed at that low altitude, and that it didn't require a high skill level for the Hijacker pilot to hit the Pentagon --- which is one of the largest office buildings in the world.
I'm sure.. hope.. you can do some thinking and perhaps learn that explanation doesn't make any sense.. the footage of planes hitting the towers didn't taint the jury pool but footage of a plane (missile) hitting the Pentagon might?2. I'm sure you can do some researching and perhaps learn why it took that Freedom of Information Act to get them to release the Videos --- the Government initially withheld the release of the Video footage because they claimed it might taint the jury pool in the sentencing trial of confessed 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui, you let me know the basis why it wasn't released to the public after the trial ---I'll keep an open mind .
Yes, that's my belief..3. You should be researching why the Pentagon was not using high speed cameras --- in case a commercial Airline traveling at low altitude & 550 mph were to strike that part of the building... Is it your belief they did have such cameras, and in fact captured a MIssile hitting the Pentagon, then made such cameras & footage disappear?...
It wouldn't negate it if the physical evidence was credible.. but it isn't, that's the point, if there was clear airplane wreckage lying around, luggage and dead bodies everywhere then no one would care about the missing pictures.. but that's lacking, which is suspicious and that only makes the missing pictures even more suspicious...4. Do you believe that because a clear enough still frame photo or motion video footage of Flight 77 impacting the Pentagon has not surfaced, that it negates every piece of physical evidence ( including Flight 77's Flight Recorder and the remains / body parts of the passengers & crew) and 87 eyewitness accounts from people who saw the Plane --- which most identified as a Commercial Airliner flying towards or hitting the Pentagon, with several witnesses stating they saw the planes wings clipping and knocking over street lights as it took aim... Is there a single credible witness who saw a Missile or anything else other than a Plane hit the Pentagon?

Really, I suppose I could ask for some pictures of dead bodies (from passengers) being removed from the Pentagon but let's not go there..Z09 » 26 Jul 2023, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ You're just being ignorant...
There were dead bodies and they were brought to Dover Base..
I never bothered to count them but I guess maybe a few dozen.. of course there were more people involved but most of them were just following orders, maybe they knew something suspicious was going on but they knew better than to ask questions..Have you ever counted how many people would have to be in your little consipracy?
This is getting annoying, I know you can't help it but you really are in desperate need of a mirror...And of course when asked the # 1 question ..."What happened to the plane if it didn't crash into the Pentagon".....your mind just goes blank...

1. First you said it was impossible that a Commercial Boeing 757 could fly that low at such speed --- Wherever you learned that from they were wrong...Jantje_Smit » 26 Jul 2023, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ But since you took the effort of typing all that I will take a swab...
I'm not going to bother with that once since it doesn't matter if the plane (that didn't the Pentagon) went 300mph or 500mph, I call it **** that some terrorist from a cave in Afghanistan could pull it off after spending a few hours on a simulator though..
I'm sure.. hope.. you can do some thinking and perhaps learn that explanation doesn't make any sense.. the footage of planes hitting the towers didn't taint the jury pool but footage of a plane (missile) hitting the Pentagon might?
Yes, that's my belief..
It wouldn't negate it if the physical evidence was credible.. but it isn't, that's the point, if there was clear airplane wreckage lying around, luggage and dead bodies everywhere then no one would care about the missing pictures.. but that's lacking, which is suspicious and that only makes the missing pictures even more suspicious...
There was no aircraft debris.Z09 » 26 Jul 2023, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ Furthermore, extensive documentation has been published, confirming that it was indeed Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon:
Flight data3
Radar data4
Air Traffic Control communication5
Witnesses6
Aircraft debris7
Where is the plane?Kobia2 » 26 Jul 2023, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ 1. First you said it was impossible that a Commercial Boeing 757 could fly that low at such speed --- Wherever you learned that from they were wrong...
The narrative is also that he spent most of his flight time in a simulator. Hitting the pentagon would be a much more difficult target than the towers since it's not a tower high in the air. He had some damn good precision for a amateur who mostly spent time on a simulator.2. Now you assert the Hijackers were cave-dwellers incapable of executing the attack.... All 4 Terrorists who piloted the Planes were college educated... The remaining 15 were for the physical task of overpowering the Planes Crew .. The Pilot who took over control of Flight 77 Hani Hanjour was actually the only one of the 4 Pilots who already had his Pilot's License prior to being recruited by Al Qaeda to be trained for the 9/11 Mission... He received his Pilot's License in Arizona 1999...
Video or no video. Who cares? Where is the plane?3. I have and it makes perfect sense --- The Video footage is obviously limited and blurry and the sources I provided explained why.. Do you know for a fact the cameras in that photo you posted are not the ones that took the footage which was released? The footage was collaborated by every single witness who saw the Plane descending and hit the Pentagon --- not a single witness in 20 years has come forward to say they saw a Missile or anything else... Keep in mind, most of the eyewitnesses were civilians using a roadway parallel to the Pentagon complex --- they were not DOD Employees in some government conspiracy. ..
No you didn't. You posted pics of a plane debri. There was nothing in your pics that suggest it was from the pentagon. The closest one was that piece on the lawn with the crew putting out the fire. That pic also could not have been within minutes because it was mostly smoke by then. The fire wasn't there.4. I already posted pictures of Aircraft debris from both inside & outside the crash site --- including part of the Plane's landing gear that was inside, and pieces such as one of the Plane's wheel hubs that was just outside the Bldg... As for the dead bodies, again, the charred corpses & body parts of the Passengers, Crew (and the Hijackers through process of elimination) were taken from inside the Pentagon -- brought to the temporary morgue set up in the North Parking Lot --- then flown to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware for forensic examination & identification... Do you believe someone planted the corpses & limbs from Flight 77 in the Pentagon crash site , or that they were simply never there in the first place?