'''''we need a new Pearl Harbor moment'''' sorry, its simply curiousNeo » 22 Jul 2023, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ For a building to topple it needs lateral force. Something like an earthquake or tsunami or a load bearing wall to remain standing.
Unless I’m mistaken it’s never happened except on 9-11.
Its simply odd that wtc7, not hit by a plane, fell in complete perfect free fall.....from just fire. Its curiousKobia2 » 22 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Can any of the 9/11 Inside Job 'Theorists" explain how a Building that had people & security personnel working in it 24/7 would not notice the Demo Crew and machinery required for the massive undertaking of preparing those Buildings for a controlled Implosion ---- which would have included a roaring symphony of Saws, Jackhammers, etc to remove walls to access and weaken the Building's Support Columns?...
awwww lil guy,Bruce » 22 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Unless I’m mistaken it’s never happened except on 9-11.
Here’s why.
Huge steel and glass towers are only put up in dense metro areas where there are incredible fire departments.
Are there fires in the towers?
Probably very common. Here comes the fire department and puts out the fire.
But only on 9-11, there’s two jet liners almost full of fuel hit two huge towers way high up, the fires implode both, then all the twin towers become huge bon fires which feed WTC 7 until it becomes an inferno, and it pan cakes.
The worst sneak attack since Pearl Harbor overwhelmed the fire fighters.
I don’t know that’s ever happened before or since 9-11

The inferno was at the bottom of WTC-7
now is that the third building? There was a third one right?
I'm curious how not a soul saw any of the people or enormous amount of preparation involved in the controlled Demo of any of those buildings....Sumela » 22 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Its simply odd that wtc7, not hit by a plane, fell in complete perfect free fall.....from just fire. Its curious
Fair take, I agree.Kobia2 » 22 Jul 2023, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm curious how not a soul saw any of the people or enormous amount of preparation involved in the controlled Demo of any of those buildings....
I also remind the "Inside Job" Theorists that much of what got the their theories regarding WTC 7 was the Movie / Documentary called Loose Change.... This was a film made by 2 high school teens in the bedroom of one of their parent's house.
Yes, the 3rd building...not hit by a planesootedupCyndi » 22 Jul 2023, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑ now is that the third building? There was a third one right?
I've only heard there was. But never saw a pic of that on the tv. Which i thought suspicious.
The Twin Towers both collapsed within a few hours. They’d both been gob smacked by planes.sootedupCyndi » 22 Jul 2023, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑ now is that the third building? There was a third one right?
I've only heard there was. But never saw a pic of that on the tv. Which i thought suspicious.
What people should understand was the significance of the 1993 World Trade Center Attack.....Sumela » 22 Jul 2023, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny how 911 resulted in the
murder, maiming, dislocation of 10 million Arabs.
The mass migration to Europe, weakening them making them more slave like to WASH DC
The full control of Iraqs oil
The full control of Libyan oil.
Always ask.....qui bono....who benefits.
Seems a fair question to at least consider...."""WE NEED A NEW PEARL HARBOR MOMENT""
When I was on a news chat group. There used to be this fella. Day and night- all he said.
LOL.Kobia2 » 22 Jul 2023, 9:44 pm » wrote: ↑ What people should understand was the significance of the 1993 World Trade Center Attack.....
It was the same Target by the same Terror organization (Al Qaida ) ..... As you might recall, the plan was to detonate a large Truck Bomb in the basement parking garage of one Tower, and having the detonation cause that tower to collapse into the other, bring both down... Had the attack succeeded as intended, far more would have been killed than on 9/11.... The reason this 1993 attack is largely dismissed is because the result did not match the intent...
So what's the difference between 1993 and 2001?...... The 1993 attack happened under Bill Clinton, and the 2001 attack happened under Bush.... No one was crying inside job in 93 under Clinton -- and had Clinton been in Office on 9/11 2001 no one would be crying inside job either...
Always best to remain curious ...always ask questionssootedupCyndi » 22 Jul 2023, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑ When I was on a news chat group. There used to be this fella. Day and night- all he said.
I will give anyone who knows what happened to building 7...... A 100,000 dollars.
It has always bugged me that the media never showed that building. I never saw it anyway.
There also used to be this woman scientist interviewed on the over night radio. Top of her field. That thought it was a secret weapon of some sorts.
Can't really remember because it was years ago. But she was a fascinating interview. just throwing that out there.
Don't be an asshole Sumela....Sumela » 22 Jul 2023, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Fair take, I agree.
But..."""we need a new pearl harbor moment"""
Shazammm, they got. Are you not curious ever?
Or do just always go full ESTAB