Ok, I took the trouble of doing some googling.. at least you are trying to make an argument, unlike the zo9 clown..Kobia2 » 26 Jul 2023, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ They didn't need to be expert Pilots to achieve what they accomplished..... The 2 Hijacker Pilots that were able to divert their Flight's courses to reach Manhattan and fly their Planes into both the North & South Towers did so... The Planes had already taken off when they took control... All that was required of them was to replot the Plane's course, descend, and hit their target..
Yeah, it's different.. the target was one specific site of the Pentagon, at ground level.. a lot more difficult then hitting a big skyscraper hundreds of feet up.. that's why they used a cruise missile for that instead of a remotely controlled plane...It's no different than Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon.... The Plane was already airborne when hijacked.. It was just a matter of changing the Plane's course, descending and striking the 2nd largest office building on the planet at 6.5 MILLION square feet... The Pilots weren't required to take-off, make a skilled landing, or strike a small target.... It's also important to note they flew in the day time in clear weather...
lol.. you can discuss what you want but you keep avoiding the question, it's the **** Pentagon with a budget of countless $billions, don't tell me they can't afford high resolution security cameras covering every inch of it... low resolution, one frame a second.. lol.. please.. hundreds of cameras and that's the best they can come up with..We discussed the Cameras....
This site has probably the most information on the cameras in use at the Pentagon that day and can give a far more in depth explanation.. There were up to 80 Cameras on the Bldg that day, and this site breaks down where they were in relation to the impact zone..
Yes, that's the conspiracy... but go ahead and prove me wrong, see if you can find any pictures of bodies being removed from the Pentagon (the passengers that is)..The bodies were simply never there in the first place?... The body parts of those on Flight 77 were intermingled with those of the Pentagon workers also killed in the explosion.. They were brought to Dover Air Base together --- unless part of the conspiracy was the Men in Black brought the pieces of human remains from different locations and then tossed them together like a salad... LOL

The bigger picture is, it was done within the same species by separate ancestral lineages believing different ways of life exceeding the time living only happens while evolving here one at a time "Common Since" inception conceived one at a time in series parallel positions occupying space specifically here now.Sumela » 26 Jul 2023, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe not an inside job....
But possibly a War Complex job...
They made TRILLIONS due to this event.
Oh boy...and then you wonder why people think you're totally clueless..Z09 » 27 Jul 2023, 5:38 am » wrote: ↑ When you stated the plane was flown to Area 51 during a debate I thought you were serious.
Now you realize how dumb it sounded and says it was a joke.
lol.. no, I don't..The very first thing you have to settle is tell us what happened to the plane that 87 witnesses saw just a few minutes before the crash...??
See that's what makes you so irksome, the argument is 'there's no pictures of the plane crashing..while there obviously should be... 'You base your argument on "there's no pictures of the plane crashing..."

No, the cruise missile could have come from a submarine.. and no one would miss it, it would be during an exercise, they would be firing a missile like ordered but it just wouldn't go where it was supposed to go...Z09 » 27 Jul 2023, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ So now the cruise missile came from a submarine..?
WTF?
So only two people on the submarine would know about a cruise missile being shot off?
How about at the end of the voyage and there's a cruise missle missing?
Your fairy tale story is down right silly now...
You're not only irksome, you're a total bore too.. goes with the territory I guess..You're getting more and more silly everytime you respond.
Tell us...
What happened to the original plane?
It starts with that.

You quoted my post, you must have read it, it wasn't that long.. ok, english isn't my first language but I usually manage.. it's not me, it's you..Z09 » 27 Jul 2023, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ Nobody would miss a cruise missle.?
Do you know how dumb you sound?
Cruise missile has numbers on them ..
And some submarine is going to pull into port and there's one missing and no one would take notice?
You sound like a friggin idiot
It's really isn't me that sounds like a friggin idiot....and no one would miss it, it would be during an exercise, they would be firing a missile like ordered but it just wouldn't go where it was supposed to go...

razoo » 22 Jul 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ They were receiving flight instructions and paying cash money for their instruction ........... odd thing about this instruction is they were not interested in landing only take off .......
Where was the GW Bush surveillance team? No where to be found. Clinton had these terrorists under surveillance then GW came along and provided no more funding. Inside job? You bet inside the Bush admin,
Big brother knew of these nut jobs yet lost funding and they were living within walking distance of NSA headquarters yet still got away with this terrorist activity................. Inside job = the GOP
Splain.Nostradamus'omh » 27 Jul 2023, 5:09 am » wrote: ↑ The bigger picture is, it was done within the same species by separate ancestral lineages believing different ways of life exceeding the time living only happens while evolving here one at a time "Common Since" inception conceived one at a time in series parallel positions occupying space specifically here now.
Accountability without reasonable doubt.
Every reality bitches about every other reality being absolutely corrupted so as a whole species all sides saying the same thing, the whole species has been corrupted historically.
Read between the lines of communicating past into current events regardless which tongue, alphabet, people chose to believe live exceeds mutually evolving forward here one ancestor at a time combined as everyone here in plain sight.
That damned simple.
It doesn't have to be a submarine, maybe a military base or it was dropped from a bomber but as I said, it doesn't matter where it came from.. and of course some people saw it.. a silvery streak hitting the Pentagon, just like one of your witnesses said..Z09 » 27 Jul 2023, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ So on the morning of 911 a cruise missile from a submarine was shot at the Pentagon and nobody saw it...?
But at the same time 87 witnesses saw an American Airlines jet flying low and crashing into the building and you dismiss it?
But at the same time a cruise missile was shot from a submarine
So, why aren't you whining about missing missiles anymore?You're an idiot
Z09 » 27 Jul 2023, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑ Can you explain what happened to the plane?
And then explain why 87 people are on record saying they saw an American Airlines plane ?
I get the feeling you're a friggin idiot...
Jantje_Smit » 24 Jul 2023, 2:37 am » wrote: ↑ Another who the **** cares, the deep state is good at making things disappear, maybe they dumped it in the ocean, maybe it went to area 51..
ok, that's a lie, I'm certain of it...And then explain why 87 people are on record saying they saw an American Airlines plane ?
Jantje_Smit » 26 Jul 2023, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ Nah, most of them are probably convinced they are telling the truth... they saw something hit the Pentagon, the headlines scream it was terrorists hijacking planes so that must have been what they saw, they embellished their story and told the media so they could get their 15 minutes of fame..
Some of them clearly just made it up though, that's one of them..

I got the idea that *** is an annoying troll..
Eh, which 50 FBI agents would that be?He already stated the 50 FBI agents were all phonies

There is a huge difference between the MIC taking full advantage of Americans outrage over the attacks to make hundreds of billions of dollars and a false flag. The first is undeniably true. The second is flat earther gender ideology fantasy land.Sumela » 27 Jul 2023, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ 911 ensured that the War Complex
will forever occupy the middle east
as Mafia Muscle for Oil Cos.
The CIA has infiltrated and controlled dozens of terrorists groups ever sinceNeo » 27 Jul 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ There is a huge difference between the MIC taking full advantage of Americans outrage over the attacks to make hundreds of billions of dollars and a false flag. The first is undeniably true. The second is flat earther gender ideology fantasy land.
Jesus and his twelve disciples with Mary Magadeline leading the way, were out doing good deeds one day.Z09 » 27 Jul 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ So 87 people who made statements about the American Airlines plane are all lying??
Rock » 26 Jul 2023, 10:18 pm » wrote: ↑ That question was answered in the many links that Kobia presented. Obviously you ignored them.
1. The source you provided was from Sept 13th 2001 ---2 days after the attack... That's awfully quick to make such a conclusion don't you agree?... Many were making all sorts of claims in the early days, which turned out to be erroneous -- some unintentionally, and others were not so.... I provided sources from experienced trained pilots who stated it did not require a high skill level to crash those passenger jets.. I did some searching and there are Pilots on both sides of this, but overwhelmingly most concur it was not impossible for Terrorist Hani Hanjour to accomplish such a maneuver... Witnesses also said along with seeing the Plane clip & knock down street lights -- the wings also tipped up & down a few times as it approached the Pentagon.Jantje_Smit » 27 Jul 2023, 3:38 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, I took the trouble of doing some googling.. at least you are trying to make an argument, unlike the zo9 clown..
Experts say any pilot with basic training could keep a 757 or 767 on a level course. However maneuvering a plane to change its flight path or navigate the craft in changing weather conditions would require months of additional training and experience.
Unlike a small private plane where pilots generally fly visually, a commercial plane like those hijacked Tuesday require a vast command of navigation techniques as well as in-depth knowledge of their myriad systems, from hydraulics to the autopilot.
Hijackers flew skillfully to targets, experts say
Yeah, it's different.. the target was one specific site of the Pentagon, at ground level.. a lot more difficult then hitting a big skyscraper hundreds of feet up.. that's why they used a cruise missile for that instead of a remotely controlled plane...
Another fun question, why would suicide hijackers with amateur pilot skills go through the effort of making a ground level attack which a trained pilot would have trouble pulling off when they could simply dive straight onto to it from above?
lol.. you can discuss what you want but you keep avoiding the question, it's the **** Pentagon with a budget of countless $billions, don't tell me they can't afford high resolution security cameras covering every inch of it... low resolution, one frame a second.. lol.. please.. hundreds of cameras and that's the best they can come up with..
Yes, that's the conspiracy... but go ahead and prove me wrong, see if you can find any pictures of bodies being removed from the Pentagon (the passengers that is)..
if, should, would, could, might, may, seems like, same as, but, and, or isn't the same details as every other results done and continuing here now spontaneously individually here with specificity of simultaneously evolving now.Jantje_Smit » 27 Jul 2023, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑ Oh boy...and then you wonder why people think you're totally clueless..
lol.. no, I don't..
See that's what makes you so irksome, the argument is 'there's no pictures of the plane crashing..while there obviously should be... '
You just ignore the second part and hope people won't notice..