I have a lot of good points, unlike the 9/11 conpiracy deniers, they refuse to follow the science.. lol.. you can point out embarrassing facts to them that undermine their entire narrative but they will simply ignore it and pretend it never happened.. like those streetlights.. I'n not expecting an answer but it's fun to see them try to weasel their way out of it and make them look like friggin idiots...Vegas » 28 Jul 2023, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Good point. I never thought about that. Not to mention that just outside the hole, not in this pic, the grass is not scorched.

You will have to take that up with disabled Bruce, I concluded nothing, he is the one that claims the hijackers couldn't find the white house so they hit the Pentagon instead..Kobia2 » 28 Jul 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Not sure how you concluded the Hijackers of Flight 93 got lost, or couldn't find the Capitol... The Plane took off from Newark New Jersey with its destination being San Francisco..... The Hijackers changed the Plane's course and were in fact en route towards the Capitol, most likely to hit the White House....
But you do.. even with the picture right in front of you..
That would be those same witnesses that said they saw it knock over streetlights.. were they all lying?What happened to the plane that almost 100 people say they saw moments before the crash?
lol.. I told you many times but it just doesn't register, I wasn't involved in the planning, the deep state didn't tell me where the plane went, I can make a guess but it also doesn't matter, I simply don't give a ****.. but I will give it a go when you tell me why those streetlights are still standing..Simple question..
Why do you avoid it?

What others, those streetlights are right in front of the hole in the Pentagon, how did the plane miss them?Z09 » 29 Jul 2023, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Just because you see some standing streetlights in the photos it doesn't mean there's others that weren't knocked over...
I knew I wouldn't have to make an effort..Well then
Where' the plane?
See @Taipan , I wasn't kidding..Jantje_Smit » 29 Jul 2023, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑.. but I will give it a go when you tell me why those streetlights are still standing..

You watching which way the wind is blowing?Vegas » 28 Jul 2023, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Good point. I never thought about that. Not to mention that just outside the hole, not in this pic, the grass is not scorched.
Mind telling us the source this Pic came from?..... The angle is very deceptive.Jantje_Smit » 29 Jul 2023, 5:55 am » wrote: ↑ You will have to take that up with disabled Bruce, I concluded nothing, he is the one that claims the hijackers couldn't find the white house so they hit the Pentagon instead..
But about those streetlights.. I know you won't answer the question but it's fun to remind you.. in a civil way..
![]()

Say the plane is flying 300 mph minimum. How many feet per second is that moving? 88' per second each 60 mph. over 400' per second. Those 85 witnesses had less than a second to watch that plane go over.Kobia2 » 29 Jul 2023, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ Mind telling us the source this Pic came from?..... The angle is very deceptive.
Here's an aerial photos of the Pentagon The cluster of street lights in your photo are actually far to the right in reality... The Plane hit the Building in a straight dead-on path --- not on a sharp angle where it would have struck those Lights which are clearly far of that path... LOL
I don't know where that picture comes from, I just googled for pictures of 9/11 Pentagon crash and that one was between them.. but you can clearly see the hole in the middle of the picture so how can it be to the far right in your picture?Kobia2 » 29 Jul 2023, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ Mind telling us the source this Pic came from?..... The angle is very deceptive.
Here's an aerial photos of the Pentagon The cluster of street lights in your photo are actually far to the right in reality... The Plane hit the Building in a straight dead-on path --- not on a sharp angle where it would have struck those Lights which are clearly far of that path... LOL


What is on the other side of the highway as only the right side is shown. Not the left. The plane was coming in low and straight. Maybe bottom of the plane less than 25' off the ground.Jantje_Smit » 29 Jul 2023, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know where that picture comes from, I just googled for pictures of 9/11 Pentagon crash and that one was between them.. but you can clearly see the hole in the middle of the picture so how can it be to the far right in your picture?
But never mind, all the street lights in your not deceptive picture are all still standing too.. I'm not good with paint but I made some orange, same question, how come the plane managed to miss everyone of them?
I don't know what's on the other side of the highway, more streetlights probably.. and I suspect those are still standing too...Nostradamus'omh » 29 Jul 2023, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ What is on the other side of the highway as only the right side is shown. Not the left. The plane was coming in low and straight. Maybe bottom of the plane less than 25' off the ground.
Jantje_Smit » 29 Jul 2023, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ What others, those streetlights are right in front of the hole in the Pentagon, how did the plane miss them?
It's not a problem for a cruise missile though..
I knew I wouldn't have to make an effort..
See @Taipan , I wasn't kidding..
![]()
Jantje_Smit » 29 Jul 2023, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know what's on the other side of the highway, more streetlights probably.. and I suspect those are still standing too...
But the plane wasn't coming in low and straight, the cruise missile was.. I hope you don't go along with the corrupted reality of the official propaganda..
Stay on message, clown.Jantje_Smit » 29 Jul 2023, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know what's on the other side of the highway, more streetlights probably.. and I suspect those are still standing too...
But the plane wasn't coming in low and straight, the cruise missile was.. I hope you don't go along with the corrupted reality of the official propaganda..
:blink:
I told you more than once that it would have been during an exercise so of course plenty of people would notice.. and no one would miss a missile..Z09 » 29 Jul 2023, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ And you can send a cruise missile from a military base and no one would notice????
I am serious, you are a friggin idiot..You can't be serious
Jantje_Smit » 29 Jul 2023, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know what's on the other side of the highway, more streetlights probably.. and I suspect those are still standing too...
But the plane wasn't coming in low and straight, the cruise missile was.. I hope you don't go along with the corrupted reality of the official propaganda..
Jantje_Smit » 29 Jul 2023, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ What others, those streetlights are right in front of the hole in the Pentagon, how did the plane miss them?
It's not a problem for a cruise missile though..
I knew I wouldn't have to make an effort..
See @Taipan , I wasn't kidding..
![]()
Obviously... you are both totally clueless, I'm sure she will make you very happy... ask her about area51..
Did you tell the squatch *** that you dumped him, I would love to see him cry?Z....is my 2nd..........
You are no Paul Newman nor a cool hand luke. Now, that George Kennedy role is more your speed.Taipan » 29 Jul 2023, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ Little one,
I run too fast.
I will blind you........with light.
Light.
Z.......I need a good lawyer. :)
https://youtu.be/cxKUupk0kbY
Don't worry, it's pretty clear that I am right and the conspiracy deniers look like fools.. I just want to make sure you are on my team..