You're dead wrong..... The weather that day for the Northeast down to the Mid-Atlantic which included the DC area was described by Air Authorities as "Severe Clear"..... O'Brien said the Plane was within a couple of miles of his C-130 when it crossed his path... He described it as either a 757 or 767....Majik » 30 Jul 2023, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ No, what he saw because of the poor visibility of that day was something resembling an Aircraft that was painted in the same colors as what hit the Pentagon..



Well, what about that very real plane that hit the South Tower?Vegas » 30 Jul 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Have you seen the waste that our government is capable of? Take one look at the plane graveyards from past military manufacturing. Most of them never even flew, yet they were thrown away. It's not hard.
They never existed.
As if fabricating paperwork of any kind is really that hard for our government. They do it with passports all the time.
Again. Not hard. As far as the grieving kinfolks, there weren't any.
There weren't any.
So?
Z09 » 30 Jul 2023, 7:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Something happened to these people that day...
Because they were dropped off at the airport...
Bruce » 30 Jul 2023, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, what about that very real plane that hit the South Tower?
Do you believe that plane was real?
Z09 » 30 Jul 2023, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ The passengers families..
Are you saying the families are lying too?
There. Those were hijacked by rag heads, right?
USA Todayrazoo » 30 Jul 2023, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ FIND ANOTHER useless theory to discuss such *** Supply Side Economics which quickly became Reaganomics which quickly became Wreckanomics which quickly began getting laughed off the economic
stage........ The Laffer Curve
Time Magazine
Aug 9, 2012 — The consensus? Laffer seems to have forgotten, or ignored, some pretty basic concepts in economics. In other words, Laffer is getting laughed off the economic stage.
https://business.time.com/2012/08/09/ar ... is-a-foul/9/11 hijackers were 'hiding in plain sight' before the 2001 ...
Actually,Vegas » 30 Jul 2023, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Per the official report from our beloved government ^^^. Our government is always truthful and would never lie.
None of this accounts for why there was no plane at the pentagon. I already went over the pics you provided.
CLINTON was watching these ****........razoo » 30 Jul 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Food for thought ......
First no one was sure who did it.....then suddenly names appeared = someone knew
Then the rumor was the hijackers were only interested to learning take off NOT landing. Cold hard cash was funding this
Yes the mess on capitol hill got cleaned up rapidly ==== to not reveal how vulnerable the USA national security to terrorism????????? Who knows = things were kept quiet. CENSORSHIP LIVES????
The original 9/11 deniers were all far left Bush haters.Z09 » 30 Jul 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ We were attacked numerous times under Clinton ..
Did you know that?
YU are grasping for straws ......... this discussion is and has been about 9/11/01. How many other administrationsZ09 » 30 Jul 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ We were attacked numerous times under Clinton ..
Did you know that?
Z09 » 30 Jul 2023, 7:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Just wondering...
If there were no passengers and no flight...
....Why would they disassemble a plane?
None of this matters to people who think they know better.Kobia2 » 27 Jul 2023, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑ This is getting silly now..... There is every indication these photos were taken Sept 12th and Sept 13th from both inside & outside the crash site at the Pentagon.... Look at the source again..
https://rense.com/general32/phot.htm
The Pictures are cataloged & sourced as to who took them, and where they were posted... Many were taken and posted by a named photographer --- Jocelyn Augustino, a freelance photographer working closely with FEMA Disaster Responses since 1995... Over the years her photographs have been published in numerous major News & Media Outlets.
https://www.fema.gov/blog/showing-our-s ... 0reservist.
More were taken by VATF-1 Workers (Virginia Task Force 1) --- a Domestic & International Disaster Response Resource trained in the with expertise in the rescue of victims from collapsed structures, following a natural or man-made catastrophic event...
https://www.vatf1.org/
Others were taken by photographers from nearby Military Base (Army) Fort. Belvoir
https://www.military.com/base-guide/fort-belvoir
Despite the destructive fire that raged inside the impact area on 9/11, pieces of debris were visible on 9/13 and 9/14, and were photographed by recovery workers. These photos clearly show pieces of landing gears, a large turbofan engine, and fuselage. The evidence inside the building is consistent with the evidence of plane wreckage outside -- indicating that a commercial airliner flew into the Pentagon on September 11th
On shore and off shore infiltrators.razoo » 30 Jul 2023, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ YU are grasping for straws ......... this discussion is and has been about 9/11/01. How many other administrations
have had to deal with ........... on shore and off shore infiltrators?
BTW can you document your position?
What does"East Coast Haze" mean to you ?Kobia2 » 30 Jul 2023, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You're dead wrong..... The weather that day for the Northeast down to the Mid-Atlantic which included the DC area was described by Air Authorities as "Severe Clear"..... O'Brien said the Plane was within a couple of miles of his C-130 when it crossed his path... He described it as either a 757 or 767....
This is the same argument you used to try and discredit the Taxi driver Lloyd England -- claiming he and all the witnesses who saw American Airlines Boeing Flight 77 clip and knock down the lamp posts before impacting the Pentagon were mistake and didn't see that it was a Missile instead of an Airplane... You were wrong on that point as well.... Many if not most of the witnesses at the Pentagon who saw the Plane were civilians on the roadway running parallel to the site--- with no connection to to the government or military, as to be coerced or sworn to silence --- and from that day up to now not a single one has claimed it was a Missile and not an Aircraft.
![]()
No, he has a sincere belief in 9/11 conspiracy theoriesRock » 30 Jul 2023, 9:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Vegas is trolling you, and Kobia, and everyone else on this thread.
Your articlegolfboy » 30 Jul 2023, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑ On shore and off shore infiltrators.
And now Joe has opened the borders, and just let them all in.
Have you heard about all the Chinese military aged men crossing our border right now?
No, I'll bet you haven't heard a word on any of your liberal "news" outlets.
Thousands of Chinese illegally entering US at southern border