Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's the way I see it...
A plane was hijacked and flown into the Pentagon and the same day other planes were hijacked.
The "Deep State" didn't fire a cruise missile.
There's no evidence there was a missile and no witnesses said they saw a missile.
However, hundreds of witnesses said they saw an airplane.
These people are from all different walks of life and didn't know each other.
We're suppose to believe that all these people actually lied about what they witnessed?
And at the same time every one kept quiet for decades?
And we're suppose to believe the passengers, crew and relatives never existed?
And the plane was disassembled?
It's totally laughable..
100% not believable...
In order to accept this bull **** you'd have to have literally hundreds of people involved before, during and after....
And all these people took part in a mass murder?
And none of them told their sweetheart?
This plane was spotted by ATC in Indianpolis and it turned around...
Phone calls from the plane...
Hundreds of people saying the plane flew right over them before the crash..
Can you give us a list of people that said they saw a cruise missile?
Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I likely will..
Because the truth is my strongest point..
You say the plane was disassembled?
By whom?
Where?
Why?
But you saying "the plane was disassembled" should be enough?
No..
It opens up and new set of questions..
Passengers and crews that never existed?
WTF?
Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑
There's a hundred eye witnesses that say they saw an American Airlines plane flying close to the ground on 911 just moments before and explosion at the Pentagon...
And members of Congress toured the crash the next days and saw plane parts....
And passengers and crew members on that plane has never been seen again...
To put any credibility in your wacky theory I'd like to hear from witnesses that claim they saw a cruise missile.
And we're 50 pages into this..
Nobody has claimed they saw a cruise missile....
Not even a disgrunted Air Traffic Controller employee....
Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ You say the plane was disassembled and the passengers and crew never existed...
Can I laugh with you?
There's photos of damage and plane parts....
And photos and photos and photos
You just don't believe them or the hundreds of witnesses...
No evidence and no evidence.
Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ There's no evidence there was a plane crash?
Yes there is...
There's plenty
And the hundred witnesses saw it go down...
And they all lied or what?
No evidence and no evidence.
Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Sean Boger was one of the few people at the Pentagon who saw the plane coming in so low it took down a street light.
"I just looked up and, you know, a plane was flying directly at us," he said.
He said it was just 10 to 15 seconds before the plane hit the building.
"I just couldn't believe something that big could be flying that low and flying directly at us," he reiterated.
Boger was in the control tower for the Pentagon's helipad when he saw the plane, which was flying at 530 mph, loaded with 7,000 gallons of jet fuel and carrying 59 people.
You are kind of boring for a rightie? scroll by? poster-????Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's try this...
Show me evidence of a cruise missile...
Witnesses...
ATC alerting there's something in the air...
Norad...
Maybe someone claiming they were on a submarine or military base and a missile was fired off...
You must have something other than "that photo looks odd" and "the hole is too small"
Well drop your replies? If you don't believe it- but yet -Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ This has been going on for 50 pages...
I think a plane hit the Pentagon...
A couple others here think it was a missile..
For the recrod...
They have many more responses than I do
I found this plane wreckage, my bad. I never saw this one. It is the tail. I didn't know about this.Z09 » 04 Aug 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ So all these people lied about seeing a plane when they really saw a missile?

Al JazeeraVegas » 22 Jul 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I have started many threads about this...well, here is another one.
Pentagon: Where is the **** plane?
Building 7: What the **** caused that collapse? It wasn't hit. And building fires don't cause a straight down collapse...they just burn.
Twin Towers: Engineers have repeatedly said that the impacts of the plane and jet fuel could not take down those towers, especially straight down like that.
Amateur pilots: How the hell can 19 rag heads, with barely any flight experience, fly those gigantic planes with such precision?
razoo » 04 Aug 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Al Jazeera
https://www.aljazeera.com › opinions › 9-11-should-h...
Sep 11, 2021 — Smoke pours from the twin towers of the World Trade Center after they were hit by two hijacked airliners in an attack on September 11, 2001 ...
it flew from the Indian Ocean?Vegas » 04 Aug 2023, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I found this plane wreckage, my bad. I never saw this one. It is the tail. I didn't know about this.
That wreckage is from a different airliner crash... at least according to Google and CNN.Vegas » 04 Aug 2023, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I found this plane wreckage, my bad. I never saw this one. It is the tail. I didn't know about this.
9/11 should have led to a criminal investigation, not a war......... the Iraq war took the spotlight off the GW Bush admin screw up.......razoo » 04 Aug 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Al Jazeera
https://www.aljazeera.com › opinions › 9-11-should-h...
Sep 11, 2021 — Smoke pours from the twin towers of the World Trade Center after they were hit by two hijacked airliners in an attack on September 11, 2001 ...9/11 should have led to a criminal investigation, not a war
which ultimately produced the second GW Bush/Cheney screw uprazoo » 04 Aug 2023, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ 9/11 should have led to a criminal investigation, not a war......... the Iraq war took the spotlight off the GW Bush admin screw up.......
Nobody misses anything they intentionally ignore. They will miss things that never happened naturally after ideas believed possible after birth.Jantje_Smit » 04 Aug 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ That's a new one, where did that come from, did I miss something... besides a plane that it is..
:rofl:
have you done a reverse look up? that's fun to do.RedheadedStranger » 04 Aug 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ That wreckage is from a different airliner crash... at least according to Google and CNN.
https://www.cnn.com/2015/08/29/europe/m ... index.html