Liberal Forum

Bruce » 13 Aug 2023, 11:40 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2023, 11:40 pm

The greatest example in modern history of an alleged false flag attack, was solved by German police as quickly as Dallas police caught Oswald. 

Yeah, Oswald was a patsy too..

The communist arsonist was caught red handed.  He freely confessed.  Three other innocent communists were found not guilty.

He freely confessed to the Gestapo.. lol.. don't you realize how insane that sounds?

After defeat  Germany wanted to blame the rise of evil on Nazi trickery when the rise of evil was supported by the people of Germany, from the bottom to the top.

So, does that mean there couldn't possibly be any nazi 'trickery'?

The Reichstag Fire was the work of one Dutch communist.

Sure, and 9/11 was the work of a bunch of evil terrorists with box cutters and amateur pilot skills that planned it all in a cave in Afghanistan..

 




 
 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 10:06 am

There's photos of debris all over the place...

 

No, there isn't. Stop **** lying. 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 5:08 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 5:08 am

You want evidence of a plane?

There's plenty...
We have a missing plane...

 

We have 100 witnesses saying they saw a plane flying low over head right before the crash..

They can say that but it isn't evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon..

We have footage and debris at the crime scene

lol.. no, you don't..

We have phone calls from the plane to family members

So?

But none of this is "credible" to you....

What I would like is a credible explanation as to why there aren't any pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon..

You can't produce anyone that said they saw a missile that day

I don't have to have to produce that, you have to produce something credible if you want people to believe a plane hit the Pentagon..

 


 

Jantje_Smit » 14 Aug 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 10:51 am

 

They can say that but it isn't evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon..

lol.. no, you don't..

So?

What I would like is a credible explanation as to why there aren't any pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon..

I don't have to have to produce that, you have to produce something credible if you want people to believe a plane hit the Pentagon..

That was a long time ago 

they didn’t have cameras like we do now

happy?
 

Mrkelly » 14 Aug 2023, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 11:01 am

That was a long time ago 

they didn’t have cameras like we do now

happy?

They had 80 of them and confiscated all but one. The one they didn't confiscate was a useless image that nobody can see. Out of 80 cameras, including one right above the crash, that wasn't damaged, none of them showed anything? Yeah, okay.   

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 11:10 am

They had 80 of them and confiscated all but one. The one they didn't confiscate was a useless image that nobody can see. Out of 80 cameras, including one right above the crash, that wasn't damaged, none of them showed anything? Yeah, okay. 

  I was trying to help Z09 with his case   

Mrkelly » 14 Aug 2023, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 11:18 am

  I was trying to help Z09 with his case 

She has no case. That's why she insists on deflecting and evading our questions. 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 11:58 am

The passengers never existed?
Remote controlled airplanes?
Area 51?
The plane was disassembled?

Deflected. Evaded my questions. 

@Mrkelly  case in point.   

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:00 pm

Deflected. Evaded my questions. 

@Mrkelly  case in point. 

Yur just not giving him/her
a chance to prove you wrong 
 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm

Your questions?

 

Yes. my questions. You have not answered even one. I don't know when you will learn that I am not reading your ****. I look at the first line, if it didn't answer my questions, then I move on. 

 

Mrkelly » 14 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:05 pm

Yur just not giving him/her
a chance to prove you wrong

I am giving her a chance to answer me. I already debunked her ****...that she keeps repeating. 

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:08 pm

I am giving her a chance to answer me. I already debunked her ****...that she keeps repeating.

butwhatabout?

Mrkelly » 14 Aug 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:08 pm

butwhatabout?

LOL. Yeah...what about the fact that there is no plane?  

Watch this: Z09 will copy/paste her **** about witnesses and testimonies, but still won't produce any pics of the plane hitting the pentagon...from any one of the 80 cameras. I guess none of them saw anything. I mean, obviously the FBI would never confiscate videos if it had no substance to it.   

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm

Remote controlled airplanes.....
Disassembled airplanes....

Christ...

@Mrkelly  prediction fulfilled.       

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:14 pm

Why don't you show Mr Kelly all the evidence of a missile?

Sure...after you show him the pic of a plane hitting the pentagon from one of the 80 cameras. Deal?

Yeah, I didn't think so. 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:14 pm

Why don't you show Mr Kelly all the evidence of a missile?

why don’t you explain, why one of the most secure buildings on the planet 

doesn’t have one clear video of the attack 

don’t you even wonder why that is?

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:19 pm

You know...
 

First line ^^^. Didn't answer my question. Therefore, I didn't read the rest of your ****. When will you learn ? 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:57 pm

Footage was taken by the FBI...

 

Why? You don't find that at all suspicious? Not even a little? 


Prediction
1. Evade my questions, and then you will repost your **** witnesses ****. 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 12:57 pm

Footage was taken by the FBI...
There's plenty of photos and debris...

Some has been released...

Tell us...
If it was a missile why no evidence...?
Where was it sent?
And why no witnesses?

I’ll take that as a no

you dont wonder why that is

At least it is some kind of an answer

Mrkelly » 14 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm

I’ll take that as a no

you dont wonder why that is

At least it is some kind of an answer

Now you see what @Jantje_Smit  and I have been dealing with. She refuses to answer questions. Pure cowardice.