Liberal Forum

Taipan » 14 Aug 2023, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:17 pm

I will.
Put your question clear.               

1. There were 80 cameras at the pentagon. Where are the pics/vids of the plane hitting the pentagon? We see only one blurry one that's completely useless. 
2. Where is the plane in the wreckage? The tail and pieces of the wing would be visible. 
3. The official report says that the plane hit the ground right before it hot the wall. Where are the markings on the lawn where they said it landed? 
4. Why did the FBI confiscate all the vids from all 80 cameras? Z09 keeps quoting 100 witnesses. The most reliable witnesses are the cameras, not humans. Why were they all confiscated? 
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2023, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:17 pm

They were standing right in front of it and reporting on its collapse.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Q0_12glK0

For me its always been... qui bono...who benefited.

The same folks that WROTE....''we need a new pearl harbor moment'' about one year earlier

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:21 pm

My garbage?


 

First line ^^^. Didn't answer my questions. Therefore, I didn't read your garbage.


You are still writing knowing that I am not reading it.           

Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2023, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:17 pm

They were standing right in front of it and reporting on its collapse.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Q0_12glK0

Wow. I never saw that. 

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm

1. There were 80 cameras at the pentagon. Where are the pics/vids of the plane hitting the pentagon? We see only one blurry one that's completely useless. 
2. Where is the plane in the wreckage? The tail and pieces of the wing would be visible. 
3. The official report says that the plane hit the ground right before it hot the wall. Where are the markings on the lawn where they said it landed? 
4. Why did the FBI confiscate all the vids from all 80 cameras? Z09 keeps quoting 100 witnesses. The most reliable witnesses are the cameras, not humans. Why were they all confiscated?

OK.......
You have fair point.
I cannot answer your questions.
I do not have that much info.

Are you saying this was an inside job ?
That is a hard sell.

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:30 pm

100 people saw a airplane 15 seconds before the crash...
And there's plane parts and debris...
Hard to ignore?

Since you claim the passengers never existed how do you explain the video of them at Dulles?

1. Testimonies are not evidence. No plane debri at the pentagon. **** your witnesses. 
2. No, there wasn't. Stop lying. 
3. There is nothing to ignore. 

Try again. 
 
 

Taipan » 14 Aug 2023, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:29 pm

OK.......
You have fair point.
I cannot answer your questions.
I do not have that much info.

Are you saying this was an inside job ?
That is a hard sell.

@Z09  see this? This is what it's called an honest and intelligent response. It's okay to admit that you don't know something. It really is. All you have to do is admit that you don't know the answers to my question. That's all. Lower your ego. 

Yes, Taipan. I am saying it's an inside job. Way too many inconsistencies between the 9/11 commission report and physical evidence. It doesn't add up. 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:38 pm

There was no debris at the Pentagon?
There's footage...
Videos
And Congress viewed the crash site..

All lies?

1. Correct. 
2. No, there isn't. The FBI confiscated all the footage. Remember?
3. No videos. Remember? 
4. Oh yeah...congress. Now they are really trustworthy. They would never lie about anything.   

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:39 pm

How about the footage of the passengers at the airport?

You say they never existed..

Maybe the plane was shot down over the sea. Honestly, I am not interested in where the plane or people are. I am interested in where the plane and passengers were reported to be, but they aren't. The plane isn't there. Period. 
 

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:36 pm

1. Testimonies are not evidence. No plane debri at the pentagon. **** your witnesses. 
2. No, there wasn't. Stop lying. 
3. There is nothing to ignore. 

Try again.

I've already corrected you about this issue. 
Stop saying there was no plane debris, when I've shown you PICTURES of that debris. 
 

golfboy » 14 Aug 2023, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:43 pm

I've already corrected you about this issue. 
Stop saying there was no plane debris, when I've shown you PICTURES of that debris.

Everybody has shown me pics of plane debris. There is no evidence that debris is the plane at the pentagon. It doesn't show that. It could be from anywhere from any plane crash. There is one piece of a debris on the lawn, which btw looks like it was cleaned, washed, and waxed. However, that pic was taken probably a good hour, maybe more, after the incident. Where is the tail and pieces of the wings? A Boeing 757 will still have some debris in the lawn, somewhere. 

Sumela » 14 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm

For me its always been... qui bono...who benefited.

The same folks that WROTE....''we need a new pearl harbor moment'' about one year earlier

You *******.
"Quid-Pro-Quo".
Latin.
"Something for something".
Hannibal Lecter.
Silence of the Lambs.

Does this mean that me & Hannibal are smarter than you ??
Most assuredly.
"The best defense.....is a strong offence".                              


https://youtu.be/b7OAcficz6c

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm

Everybody has shown me pics of plane debris. There is no evidence that debris is the plane at the pentagon. It doesn't show that. It could be from anywhere from any plane crash. There is one piece of a debris on the lawn, which btw looks like it was cleaned, washed, and waxed. However, that pic was taken probably a good hour, maybe more, after the incident. Where is the tail and pieces of the wings? A Boeing 757 will still have some debris in the lawn, somewhere.

lol.   I told you my brother was assigned there, to pick up those parts. 

The tail and wing pieces are aluminum, that hit a cement building at 300 mph.
Where do you think that aluminum went?
 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm

You claim the plane was disassembled and the passengers never even existed

It's bizarre

I also claimed that I don't give a **** about what happened to it. Maybe aliens from outer space swallowed it up. I don't give a ****. I claimed that I am more concerned why it's not at the pentagon. You should be concerned about that also. 

 

Taipan » 14 Aug 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:47 pm

You *******.
"Quid-Pro-Quo".
Latin.
"Something for something".
Hannibal Lecter.
Silence of the Lambs.

Does this mean that me & Hannibal are smarter than you ??
Most assuredly.
"The best defense.....is a strong offence".                              


 

You drunk Hagee ***. Yer wasted on heretic cum.

Qui Bono..."who benefits"
 

golfboy » 14 Aug 2023, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:48 pm

lol.   I told you my brother was assigned there, to pick up those parts. 

 

Another testimony. No offense, but I don't know you from a hole in the ground. You could be full of ****. 

The tail and wing pieces are aluminum, that hit a cement building at 300 mph.
Where do you think that aluminum went?

Where it always would go. Wrecked into pieces somewhere. It's not hard to find 757 crashes and still see at least some of the tail and other pieces of the wreck around it. Google it. You will see pics everywhere. 

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:52 pm

Another testimony. No offense, but I don't know you from a hole in the ground. You could be full of ****. 

Where it always would go. Wrecked into pieces somewhere. It's not hard to find 757 crashes and still see at least some of the tail and other pieces of the wreck around it. Google it. You will see pics everywhere.

Show me a wreck of an aircraft hitting a building going 300 MPH. 
The crashes you are talking about, hit land or water, which aren't hardened surfaces.
 

golfboy » 14 Aug 2023, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:54 pm

Show me a wreck of an aircraft hitting a building going 300 MPH. 
The crashes you are talking about, hit land or water, which aren't hardened surfaces.

Hitting the ground at 400 mph, from 30k feet,  isn't a hardened surface?

Sumela » 14 Aug 2023, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:50 pm

You drunk Hagee ***. Yer wasted on heretic cum.

Qui Bono..."who benefits"

OK.........you win that point.
I withdraw my ......"*******" remark.
I apologize.
I stand corrected.

Latin ??

Let's just see if you talk firearms as well
as you know Latin,.....(smartass)...........                            
@Squatchman  
@Skans  
https://youtu.be/iBkjdutVmFA




  

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:57 pm

Hitting the ground at 400 mph, from 30k feet,  isn't a hardened surface?

Show me.