Liberal Forum

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:36 pm

1. Testimonies are not evidence. No plane debri at the pentagon. **** your witnesses. 
2. No, there wasn't. Stop lying. 
3. There is nothing to ignore. 

Try again.

I've already corrected you about this issue. 
Stop saying there was no plane debris, when I've shown you PICTURES of that debris. 
 

golfboy » 14 Aug 2023, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:43 pm

I've already corrected you about this issue. 
Stop saying there was no plane debris, when I've shown you PICTURES of that debris.

Everybody has shown me pics of plane debris. There is no evidence that debris is the plane at the pentagon. It doesn't show that. It could be from anywhere from any plane crash. There is one piece of a debris on the lawn, which btw looks like it was cleaned, washed, and waxed. However, that pic was taken probably a good hour, maybe more, after the incident. Where is the tail and pieces of the wings? A Boeing 757 will still have some debris in the lawn, somewhere. 

Sumela » 14 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:23 pm

For me its always been... qui bono...who benefited.

The same folks that WROTE....''we need a new pearl harbor moment'' about one year earlier

You *******.
"Quid-Pro-Quo".
Latin.
"Something for something".
Hannibal Lecter.
Silence of the Lambs.

Does this mean that me & Hannibal are smarter than you ??
Most assuredly.
"The best defense.....is a strong offence".                              


https://youtu.be/b7OAcficz6c

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm

Everybody has shown me pics of plane debris. There is no evidence that debris is the plane at the pentagon. It doesn't show that. It could be from anywhere from any plane crash. There is one piece of a debris on the lawn, which btw looks like it was cleaned, washed, and waxed. However, that pic was taken probably a good hour, maybe more, after the incident. Where is the tail and pieces of the wings? A Boeing 757 will still have some debris in the lawn, somewhere.

lol.   I told you my brother was assigned there, to pick up those parts. 

The tail and wing pieces are aluminum, that hit a cement building at 300 mph.
Where do you think that aluminum went?
 

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm

You claim the plane was disassembled and the passengers never even existed

It's bizarre

I also claimed that I don't give a **** about what happened to it. Maybe aliens from outer space swallowed it up. I don't give a ****. I claimed that I am more concerned why it's not at the pentagon. You should be concerned about that also. 

 

Taipan » 14 Aug 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:47 pm

You *******.
"Quid-Pro-Quo".
Latin.
"Something for something".
Hannibal Lecter.
Silence of the Lambs.

Does this mean that me & Hannibal are smarter than you ??
Most assuredly.
"The best defense.....is a strong offence".                              


 

You drunk Hagee ***. Yer wasted on heretic cum.

Qui Bono..."who benefits"
 

golfboy » 14 Aug 2023, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:48 pm

lol.   I told you my brother was assigned there, to pick up those parts. 

 

Another testimony. No offense, but I don't know you from a hole in the ground. You could be full of ****. 

The tail and wing pieces are aluminum, that hit a cement building at 300 mph.
Where do you think that aluminum went?

Where it always would go. Wrecked into pieces somewhere. It's not hard to find 757 crashes and still see at least some of the tail and other pieces of the wreck around it. Google it. You will see pics everywhere. 

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:52 pm

Another testimony. No offense, but I don't know you from a hole in the ground. You could be full of ****. 

Where it always would go. Wrecked into pieces somewhere. It's not hard to find 757 crashes and still see at least some of the tail and other pieces of the wreck around it. Google it. You will see pics everywhere.

Show me a wreck of an aircraft hitting a building going 300 MPH. 
The crashes you are talking about, hit land or water, which aren't hardened surfaces.
 

golfboy » 14 Aug 2023, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:54 pm

Show me a wreck of an aircraft hitting a building going 300 MPH. 
The crashes you are talking about, hit land or water, which aren't hardened surfaces.

Hitting the ground at 400 mph, from 30k feet,  isn't a hardened surface?

Sumela » 14 Aug 2023, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:50 pm

You drunk Hagee ***. Yer wasted on heretic cum.

Qui Bono..."who benefits"

OK.........you win that point.
I withdraw my ......"*******" remark.
I apologize.
I stand corrected.

Latin ??

Let's just see if you talk firearms as well
as you know Latin,.....(smartass)...........                            
@Squatchman  
@Skans  
https://youtu.be/iBkjdutVmFA




  

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:57 pm

Hitting the ground at 400 mph, from 30k feet,  isn't a hardened surface?

Show me. 
 

Taipan » 14 Aug 2023, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 8:02 pm

OK.........you win that point.
I withdraw my ......"*******" remark.
I apologize.
I stand corrected.

Latin ??

Let's just see if you talk firearms as well
as you know Latin,.....(smartass)...........                            


  

I like this video much more...    

https://twitter.com/i/status/1691065183223869440
 

Sumela » 14 Aug 2023, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 8:10 pm

I like this video much more...    

https://twitter.com/i/status/1691065183223869440

LOL.........
My Tribe can whoop.............your tribe.
Wanna bet ? ?         
How much ??                             
https://youtu.be/dwjbUC9Btg8





 

golfboy » 14 Aug 2023, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 8:02 pm

Show me.

Forward to the 1:26 mark. Most of those crashes (not all) either took a nose dive or crashed into a mountain. There is still large debris. Not just small chunks, but large pieces that are obviously from a plane. 

https://www.thequint.com/photos/in-phot ... f-aviation

Z09 » 14 Aug 2023, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 8:08 pm

You're trying to convince us by claiming "you don't care"..

 

No *******. I am saying that the narrative that is told does not match up with the physical evidence. You insist on wanting to know that if the plane wasn't at the pentagon, then I am somehow obligated to know where the **** it went. I am not obligated. You are obligated to explain why it's not at the pentagon. Get it? This is your claim. Run away from your claim all you want, I will always bring you back to it. 


Prediction

You will continue to copy/paste the same **** about witnesses, or whatever, without addressing my questions.

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 8:33 pm

No *******. I am saying that the narrative that is told does not match up with the physical evidence. You insist on wanting to know that if the plane wasn't at the pentagon, then I am somehow obligated to know where the **** it went. I am not obligated. You are obligated to explain why it's not at the pentagon. Get it? This is your claim. Run away from your claim all you want, I will always bring you back to it. 

Prediction

You will continue to copy/paste the same **** about witnesses, or whatever, without addressing my questions.

Maybe that plane exploded.
Have you ever hit a 1gal. of water with a.30-30 hollow -point.?
I have.
The bullet does not shoot through & make a hole.
No.
It dumps all of its energy.  Kinetic energy......is hard to grasp.
The jug explodes.
Same thing with that jet.
Explosion.                         

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:39 pm

@Z09  see this? This is what it's called an honest and intelligent response. It's okay to admit that you don't know something. It really is. All you have to do is admit that you don't know the answers to my question. That's all. Lower your ego. 

Yes, Taipan. I am saying it's an inside job. Way too many inconsistencies between the 9/11 commission report and physical evidence. It doesn't add up.

OK.
I am listening.
I am not there yet.

Inside job ??
OK...........try this.
JFK assassination.  
Lyndon Johnson & the CIA assassins.                 

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 8:30 pm

Forward to the 1:26 mark. Most of those crashes (not all) either took a nose dive or crashed into a mountain. There is still large debris. Not just small chunks, but large pieces that are obviously from a plane. 

https://www.thequint.com/photos/in-phot ... f-aviation

 

There is nothing there, that validates your claims. 
What was the airspeed of the plane, when it hit the ground?
Was it climbing when it hit the mountain?   Did it impact the ground at a perpendicular attitude while accelerating?
 

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm

Everybody has shown me pics of plane debris. There is no evidence that debris is the plane at the pentagon. It doesn't show that. It could be from anywhere from any plane crash. There is one piece of a debris on the lawn, which btw looks like it was cleaned, washed, and waxed. However, that pic was taken probably a good hour, maybe more, after the incident. Where is the tail and pieces of the wings? A Boeing 757 will still have some debris in the lawn, somewhere.

          You have repeatedly been shown photos of plane debris which was taken at the Pentagon.... You were also provided with sources as to whom took such photos and when they were taken....

         Just using the photos of CNN Journalist Jamie Mcintyre alone who was in the Pentagon Bldg. when Flight 77 struck is enough to prove that assertion 100% wrong... He left his office in the Bldg.went to where the plane impacted, and began taking pictures.... Again, this is his account & photos taken minutes after the Plane hit the Pentagon.. 

          Vegas... Please take the time to look at these photos again, click the link to Mcintyre's testimony as he explains exactly what he is photographing, and more in depth description of the Plane wreckage... He was clearly there, and being one of the first on the scene, there was no time for the FBI or anyone to scatter plane debris all over the scene. 

https://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/20 ... alist.html

          A Google search will also turn up a full version of my report in which you can see the full context of my report, and how it was deliberately distorted by mischief-makers whose motives are frankly unfathomable to me.
Whenever  I confront one of these conspiracy promoters, the result is the same: they simply conclude I must be lying, or that the government has “gotten to me” to change my story.
But I was there. I saw the thousands of pieces of the plane scattered over the heliport outside the Pentagon. I photographed pieces of the wreckage, photos you can see here.
As a journalist I understand why some people are willing to believe the worst about the government. Because sometimes the government does lie, and cover up.
    
             

            On the heliport thousands of tiny shards of airplane wreckage cover the ground, 9/11/01 — Photo by jamie McIntyre ©2001
 
          A piece of wreckage that appears to be a cockpit window — 9/11/01 — Photo by Jamie McIntyre ©2001
 
The picture I was arrested for taking. A Pentagon Police officer claimed I violated the ban on photography. — 9/11/10 — Photo by Jamie McIntyre ©2001

 
 
 

Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm

Where is the tail and pieces of the wings? A Boeing 757 will still have some debris in the lawn, somewhere.

           This is a question I have seen you ask repeatedly.... 
 You seem convinced the Tail section of the plane should have remained intact after impact, and should explain what exactly you are basing this on.... 

           Again, people who saw the Plane impact the building, described how parts of the Plane appeared to disintegrate when it hit, then seemed to disappear inside the building... This was immediately (less than 1 second) followed by a massive explosion & fireball..... The fire raged and the E-Ring of the Building collapsed about 30 minutes later.... So accounting for the 530 Mph splintering impact -- huge explosion -- intense fire -- then being crushed & buried under a mountain of building debris, you shouldn't expect to find an intact Tail section of a Boeing 757. 

            
         
 
                 Remember, when this pic first emerged from the crash / impact site of Flight 93 in PA, there were was almost nothing recognizable above ground that would suggest a Commercial United Airlines Boeing 757 had crashed there..