I like this video much more...Taipan » 14 Aug 2023, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑ OK.........you win that point.
I withdraw my ......"*******" remark.
I apologize.
I stand corrected.
Latin ??
Let's just see if you talk firearms as well
as you know Latin,.....(smartass)...........![]()

Sumela » 14 Aug 2023, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I like this video much more...![]()
![]()
https://twitter.com/i/status/1691065183223869440
Forward to the 1:26 mark. Most of those crashes (not all) either took a nose dive or crashed into a mountain. There is still large debris. Not just small chunks, but large pieces that are obviously from a plane.
No *******. I am saying that the narrative that is told does not match up with the physical evidence. You insist on wanting to know that if the plane wasn't at the pentagon, then I am somehow obligated to know where the **** it went. I am not obligated. You are obligated to explain why it's not at the pentagon. Get it? This is your claim. Run away from your claim all you want, I will always bring you back to it.
Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ No *******. I am saying that the narrative that is told does not match up with the physical evidence. You insist on wanting to know that if the plane wasn't at the pentagon, then I am somehow obligated to know where the **** it went. I am not obligated. You are obligated to explain why it's not at the pentagon. Get it? This is your claim. Run away from your claim all you want, I will always bring you back to it.
Prediction
You will continue to copy/paste the same **** about witnesses, or whatever, without addressing my questions.
OK.Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ @Z09 see this? This is what it's called an honest and intelligent response. It's okay to admit that you don't know something. It really is. All you have to do is admit that you don't know the answers to my question. That's all. Lower your ego.
Yes, Taipan. I am saying it's an inside job. Way too many inconsistencies between the 9/11 commission report and physical evidence. It doesn't add up.
There is nothing there, that validates your claims.Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Forward to the 1:26 mark. Most of those crashes (not all) either took a nose dive or crashed into a mountain. There is still large debris. Not just small chunks, but large pieces that are obviously from a plane.
https://www.thequint.com/photos/in-phot ... f-aviation
You have repeatedly been shown photos of plane debris which was taken at the Pentagon.... You were also provided with sources as to whom took such photos and when they were taken....Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Everybody has shown me pics of plane debris. There is no evidence that debris is the plane at the pentagon. It doesn't show that. It could be from anywhere from any plane crash. There is one piece of a debris on the lawn, which btw looks like it was cleaned, washed, and waxed. However, that pic was taken probably a good hour, maybe more, after the incident. Where is the tail and pieces of the wings? A Boeing 757 will still have some debris in the lawn, somewhere.



This is a question I have seen you ask repeatedly....Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Where is the tail and pieces of the wings? A Boeing 757 will still have some debris in the lawn, somewhere.

These are photos of the Flight 93 United Airlines Boeing 757 crash site in Shanksville PA... Where's the Tail section>?Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑
Where it always would go. Wrecked into pieces somewhere. It's not hard to find 757 crashes and still see at least some of the tail and other pieces of the wreck around it. Google it. You will see pics everywhere.


Top down chain of command always seems to protect reasonable doubt rather than resolve self evident events. That need to know scenario of governance and rank gets privileges those sacrificing biological time cannot have morally, legally, ethically, following orders or face insubordination, treason, blasphemy from their own reality first.Vegas » 14 Aug 2023, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ You know what else doesn't seem to exist? Pics of an airplane hitting the pentagon from 80 cameras...one was fixed right above the crash. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
First line. ^^^ Didn't answer my questions. Thus, I didn't read the reast of your copy/pasted garbage.Z09 » 15 Aug 2023, 5:38 am » wrote: ↑ If you're trying to convince everyone of your crazy idea that it was a missile then perhaps we'd be more convinced if you could tie up some loose ends....
I was actually wondering about this as well. I don't see a plane there either. I see a burned hole. That is inconsistent with plane crashes. So, that's two missing planes now. I haven't looked into this one as much as the pentagon, but it certainly deserves it.Kobia2 » 14 Aug 2023, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ These are photos of the Flight 93 United Airlines Boeing 757 crash site in Shanksville PA... Where's the Tail section>?
People who saw a plane exploding inside the pentagon were able to see the pieces disintegrate while it was happening, in less than a second? Highly doubtful.Kobia2 » 14 Aug 2023, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑
Again, people who saw the Plane impact the building, described how parts of the Plane appeared to disintegrate when it hit, then seemed to disappear inside the building... This was immediately (less than 1 second) followed by a massive explosion & fireball..... The fire raged and the E-Ring of the Building collapsed about 30 minutes later.... So accounting for the 530 Mph splintering impact -- huge explosion -- intense fire -- then being crushed & buried under a mountain of building debris, you shouldn't expect to find an intact Tail section of a Boeing 757.
You keep saying this. It's getting an old Kobia. I have also repeatedly said, over and over, that those pieces were never shown to be at the pentagon. They could have been from anywhere. Please stop with that already.Kobia2 » 14 Aug 2023, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You have repeatedly been shown photos of plane debris which was taken at the Pentagon.... You were also provided with sources as to whom took such photos and when they were taken....
golfboy » 14 Aug 2023, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ There is nothing there, that validates your claims.
What was the airspeed of the plane, when it hit the ground?
Was it climbing when it hit the mountain? Did it impact the ground at a perpendicular attitude while accelerating?