blanket party central...sootedupCyndi » 23 Jul 2023, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ They dont dare put the trannies in with the men showers. The guys would beat the crap outta them.
I can only imagine if Churchill sent a trannie driver for Ike...probably would have shot him...Bruce » 23 Jul 2023, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Who did Churchill send to drive around Ike?
Was Kay Summersby some waddling old maid or a secret tranny?
Go see Oppenheimer.
It might turn you into an American Patriot.
They can pull that "Elephant Man" **** and yell, "I am not an animal!"sootedupCyndi » 23 Jul 2023, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ They dont dare put the trannies in with the men showers. The guys would beat the crap outta them.
By the way, she was loyal almost to the grave.ROG62 » 23 Jul 2023, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ I can only imagine if Churchill sent a trannie driver for Ike...probably would have shot him...
Here's the deal. The military is all about, SHOULD BE ALL ABOUT, training to kill and brutalize your enemy. Really, that's a man's job. Even men need to be on alert not to get brutalized in the military. But, if a woman thinks she's up to the task, then let her in. In a real military, not one that worships ***, diversity and the sissification of recruits, I say a women joining the military is stupid. I say its begging for trouble. If she can't fend off a rape, or will fall apart if this happens to her, she's not cut out to be in the military. However, if she can't fend for herself, and if she can kill and brutalize enemies with the best of them, then let her in.ROG62 » 23 Jul 2023, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ I disagree...there's enough issues with sexual assault and rape without inviting more potential having them bunking together...
ROG62 » 23 Jul 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ exactly...like every depravity, these miserable **** think everyone s/b accepting of their ****...
After 24 years in the military, I can tell you. without reservation, that females reduce the combat readiness when mixed with male counterparts. It's all about sex and human emotions. I've seen controversy because of this time and time again...controversy where it's not only unwanted, but dangerous when national defense is involved. I have no issue with females in the military working on shore duty as nurses, physicians, pilots, etc..but not at sea or overseas in a unit where men and women are placed in a position where they cannot leave their unit. Then there is the fact that creating special provisions for females is unfair to males. The only fair way to do this is have unit that are comprised of either men or women, but not both.Skans » 23 Jul 2023, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ I gotta pick on your topic a little bit, ROG62. Here's the real problem - not the guy with a dick and balls showering with females in the military. It's females in the military that are the problem.
If women want to be treated equal and be in the military, then they can shower with men. They can meet all of the physical requirements that men are required to meet, shower and sleep in the same quarters as the men. If they don't like it, then they don't have to work for the military.
Weird men with homosexual tendencies and/or tranny-fetishes are a given in the military. It's a good drill sergeant's job to beat those wacky feelings into complete suppression.
"YOU LIKE WEARING GIRL'S PANTIES, PRIVATE?
ITS YOUR DAY TO PUT ON THIS G-STRING FROM VICTORIA'S SECRET
AND FIGHT ME LIKE A MAN
OR DIE"
getting?nefarious101 » 23 Jul 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ This whole *** rights **** is getting out of hand....progressives view *** as some kind of god-like super humans....even *** are starting to hate ***
Here's the other deal...basic training is where it all happens...after that, they go to their respective areas of strength...I doubt very few women end up in the infantry...more than likely "support services"...and those that do? my thinking is they aren't the ones who that anyone needs to be concerned about....Skans » 23 Jul 2023, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's the deal. The military is all about, SHOULD BE ALL ABOUT, training to kill and brutalize your enemy. Really, that's a man's job. Even men need to be on alert not to get brutalized in the military. But, if a woman thinks she's up to the task, then let her in. In a real military, not one that worships ***, diversity and the sissification of recruits, I say a women joining the military is stupid. I say its begging for trouble. If she can't fend off a rape, or will fall apart if this happens to her, she's not cut out to be in the military. However, if she can't fend for herself, and if she can kill and brutalize enemies with the best of them, then let her in.
I hear after they get their genitals mutilated they're non-deployable for up to 18 months?Warcok » 23 Jul 2023, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑ How many tranny *** monsters are in the military just for a free genital mutilation change?
Maybe, letting in trannies keeps MAGA maggots away?Warcok » 23 Jul 2023, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑ How many tranny *** monsters are in the military just for a free genital mutilation change?
That would be funny as hell to see. A military comprised of mentally ill, suicidal tranny ***
Bruce » 23 Jul 2023, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe, letting in trannies keeps MAGA maggots away?
https://www.army.mil/standto/archive/20 ... treatment.
Seriously.
If you are hung up on the lack of a dick on the dude in your foxhole, will you save him if the enemy comes?
Or if you’ve tormented him night and day, will he be careless with artillery coordinates ?
Perhaps. But, I do believe that women in the military is what has lead us to the point where it's just a Woke-folk campground.ROG62 » 23 Jul 2023, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's the other deal...basic training is where it all happens...after that, they go to their respective areas of strength...I doubt very few women end up in the infantry...more than likely "support services"...and those that do? my thinking is they aren't the ones who that anyone needs to be concerned about....
What if?Bruce » 23 Jul 2023, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ We have women in the military.
Why do they get separate barracks and separate showers?
Let them know, if they join it’s for going to war.
We might not go to war, but what if we do?
Yup, Murka is **** and **** hard and deep. Thanks for agreeingSkans » 23 Jul 2023, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps. But, I do believe that women in the military is what has lead us to the point where it's just a Woke-folk campground.