So... you admit that NO commissioned officer pledges loyalty to the Commander in Chief, even though you said we ALL did?RebelGator » 25 Jul 2023, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Clue: I knew you made the post.....you didn't need to sign it.
I’m sure we agree he wasn’t a hack for the GOP when he called for W to be tried for war crimes for torture. That would make him….consistent.maineman » 25 Jul 2023, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑ cool opinion. My opinion of Jonathan Turley is that he is a hack for the GOP. So we will just have to agree to have differing opinions.
And why would Tom, Dick and Harry buy one..Bruce » 25 Jul 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ If you’d read more, you’d find Hunter is selling $200,000 to $500,000 paintings in the wide open, through exclusive SoHo art galleries, since 2021.
Any Tom, Dick, or Harry with the money can buy one.
Did the critics say what will happen to the price of Hunters 'art' once the senile big guy is out of the white house?The paintings are surprisingly good, say critics. Not as good as the price, but not bad.

The paintings of Adolf Hitler are still selling on the art market. The trend has been ever higher for 80 years.Jantje_Smit » 26 Jul 2023, 3:25 am » wrote: ↑ And why would Tom, Dick and Harry buy one..
Did the critics say what will happen to the price of Hunters 'art' once the senile big guy is out of the white house?
![]()

I can't really afford to respond to your disabled AI drivel either but since I'm bored and have nothing better to do.. oh, I guess I can afford it.. lol..that 'piece of art' is valuable only for one reason.. the signature.. nobody would buy that crap if Hitler had been accepted at the art school and had started a painting career instead of a psychotic dictator one...Bruce » 26 Jul 2023, 3:43 am » wrote: ↑ The paintings of Adolf Hitler are still selling on the art market. The trend has been ever higher for 80 years.
You and I cannot afford this.
Hitler was talented painting architecture, all art critics agree. His other works are all mediocre and sell for less.
lol.. you really are disabled..Hunter Bidens today, are the cheapest they’ll ever be.
well rounded hyperbole promising everyone intellectual life is larger than the reproductions living it tomorrow.maineman » 25 Jul 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't need to tell myself anything. It is how I have lived my life. Vocalization is superfluous.
Buckwheat, when you seek to undermine the authority of a superior officer, a charge of Sedition can be made more appropriately than one, for say...... trespassing.maineman » 25 Jul 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ So... you admit that NO commissioned officer pledges loyalty to the Commander in Chief, even though you said we ALL did?
Be a big boy and just admit you didn't know what the **** you were talking about rather than tap dancing and shucking and jiving to avoid admitting you were willfully stupid.
C'mon... you can't be THAT big of a ******.
Military is a dictatorship architecture, not an ancestral progression of lifetimes living as eternally separated in plain sight. wake up. Chain of command working on the need to know from top down management, which is really inside out control of the moment here.RebelGator » 26 Jul 2023, 5:00 am » wrote: ↑ Buckwheat, when you seek to undermine the authority of a superior officer, a charge of Sedition can be made more appropriately than one, for say...... trespassing. :die:
Own it, clown.
The purchaser of Hunter Biden’s art reportedly visited President Joe Biden’s White House 13 times after the president’s son first showcased his paintings at his art dealer’s gallery in New York City.Bruce » 25 Jul 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ If you’d read more, you’d find Hunter is selling $200,000 to $500,000 paintings in the wide open, through exclusive SoHo art galleries, since 2021.
Any Tom, Dick, or Harry with the money can buy one.
They are not commissions. They are sold from stock.
Supposedly the gallery owners have a blind buyer clause where they can’t tell Hunter or Joe who bought them.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/arts ... house.html
The paintings are surprisingly good, say critics. Not as good as the price, but not bad.
Trump sells $4,990,000 worth of Trump Digital Trading cards when he runs short.
There’s a sucker born every minute.
Gee, I thought the pledge was to defend the Constitution, then the commander in chief. That leaves room for an individual brain to know the difference instinctively to whether or not the President is intellectually compromised.maineman » 25 Jul 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ So... you admit that NO commissioned officer pledges loyalty to the Commander in Chief, even though you said we ALL did?
Be a big boy and just admit you didn't know what the **** you were talking about rather than tap dancing and shucking and jiving to avoid admitting you were willfully stupid.
C'mon... you can't be THAT big of a ******.
You seem to think you know a lot about the UCMJ... for a klutz who thought that officers take an oath to the CinC.RebelGator » 26 Jul 2023, 5:00 am » wrote: ↑ Buckwheat, when you seek to undermine the authority of a superior officer, a charge of Sedition can be made more appropriately than one, for say...... trespassing.![]()
Own it, clown.
even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in a while.neueregel » 25 Jul 2023, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I’m sure we agree he wasn’t a hack for the GOP when he called for W to be tried for war crimes for torture. That would make him….consistent.
When one is a legal scholar, they are able to rely more on expertise than luck.maineman » 26 Jul 2023, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in a while.
even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Intellectually right isn't physically accurate. Kinetics move, potentials haven't happened exactly as predicted it could happen, should have happened, would continue happening naturally.maineman » 26 Jul 2023, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in a while.
even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
an example: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia were both legal scholars, I am sure you would agree.neueregel » 26 Jul 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ When one is a legal scholar, they are able to rely more on expertise than luck.
No he is not!!! he is a corrupt, crackhead that rides his corrupt, demented, perverted Dad's coat tails. He did not pay his taxes, he LIED on a firearms apllication about his drug addiction (which is a felony) and has had at least 10 relapses since his supposed drug rehab.BuckNaked » 26 Jul 2023, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Hunter is a smart he’s raking in the cash plugs was right bout him
Hitler’s art has been in circulation on the art markets since he gave up the life of a professional painter.Jantje_Smit » 26 Jul 2023, 4:11 am » wrote: ↑ I can't really afford to respond to your disabled AI drivel either but since I'm bored and have nothing better to do.. oh, I guess I can afford it.. lol..that 'piece of art' is valuable only for one reason.. the signature.. nobody would buy that crap if Hitler had been accepted at the art school and had started a painting career instead of a psychotic dictator one...
lol.. you really are disabled..