Liberal Forum

Bruce » 26 Jul 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2023, 3:16 pm

If I make a mistake it’s a mistake.

Hunter Biden, son of the sitting President, today had a federal judge reject a plea because the defendant, Hunter Biden, was getting a raw deal from the government.

That is truth.

I admit I didn’t see that one coming.

But when the government said to the judge they could still prosecute Hunter for crimes the government was aware of, it was all she wrote.

 Ultimately, Hunter Biden pleaded not guilty because Noreika could not accept the plea deal as it was constructed. She repeatedly expressed her concerns about the constitutionality of the diversion deal related to the felony gun charge, specifying that the main issue with the agreement was that if Hunter Biden breached the deal, the judge would need to make a finding of fact on the matter before the government could bring charges. 

 Judge Noreika said she saw that as being "outside of my lane," noting that if the diversion agreement might be unconstitutional, then the entire plea deal would be unconstitutional, meaning that Hunter Biden would not be getting the immunity he thought. 

Beekeeper » 26 Jul 2023, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2023, 5:22 pm

No, ****, the DOJ was using this "investigation" to stop from giving information to CONGRESS and got CAUGHT ON IT!!

PERIOD!!!

It has FAR LESS to do with "protecting Hunter" than it did to PREVENT THE GOVERNMENT from using any "future investigation" to use as a reason to NOT PROVIDE CONGRESS WITH INFORMATION THEY REQUEST IN THEIR INVESTIGATION OF YOUR BOY JOE'S TREASONOUS ACTS BY SELLING INFLUENCE!!

THIS judge was having NONE OF THAT **** and her being the center of it all. She basically told the DOJ to either **** OR GET OFF THE POT and bring their investigation with CHARGES SHE KNOWS NEED TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD AND HUNTER CHARGED AS WOULD ANY OTHER CITIZEN FOR THE SAME CRIME!!!

Warcok » 26 Jul 2023, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2023, 5:10 pm

 Lying on the gun application alone is punishable by 10 years

Warcok » 26 Jul 2023, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2023, 5:45 pm

I was about to say this but in a less intelligent and coherent way

Bruce » 26 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm

Partly.

The gun deal, carried a stiff sentence  if Hunter relapses.

The only evidence the government had was Hunter’s book where he said he was a drug addict, during the time he bought a legal handgun,

Given the current law on the 2nd Amendment, could that possibly stand up on appeal?  Only in fairyland.  Thomas would write the opinion kicking that **** out.

But the nail was the judge demanded the government not charge Hunter for any crimes the government was aware of.  

Bring on the oligarchs.

The one that claims Hunter took millions in hush money.

sootedupCyndi » 26 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm

I am really starting to feeling sorry for white house nappy hair... press secretary? any bets on how much longer she can hang on. lol